Shamgar The Son Of Anath

Neal Pollard

The brief account Shamgar in Judges 3:31 is interesting and unique. Othniel had a famous family tie (Caleb). Ehud had a unique anatomical feature (he is pointed out as “left-handed”). Shamgar is known for his weapon of war (“an oxgoad”). Much more is said about the opposing rulers, the oppression, and the operation of the deliverance of the other four of Israel’s first five judges (Shamgar will be followed by Deborah and Gideon). None of the judges, including Tola, Jair, Ibzan, Elon, or Abdon, have so little said about them or their length of judging of the nation. This is what is said about him:

“After him (Ehud) was Shamgar the son of Anath, who killed 600 of the Philistines with an oxgoad, and he also saved Israel” (3:31). Add to that a line which Deborah includes in her song of victory: “In the days of Shamgar, son of Anath, in the days of Jael, the highways were abandoned, and travelers kept to the byways” (5:6). What can we learn and apply from this extremely brief record?

  • He was resourceful–He killed the Philistines with an oxgoad. Like men after him, Samson with the jawbone of a donkey (15:15-17), Adino with an unnamed weapon (2 Sam. 23:8), Eleazer with a sword (2 Sam. 23:10), and Abishai, with a spear (2 Sam. 23:18), Shamgar took what he had and used it for God. Solomon later writes, “Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might…” (Ecc. 9:10). God once asked Moses, “What is that in your hand?” (Ex. 4:2). Take inventory of your resources–money, talents, temperament, personality, intelligence, etc. Are you using them for Him?
  • He was valiant–He killed 600 Philistines with an oxgoad. What incredible odds! He went toe to toe, hand to hand, with 600 different people and was victorious over them all. He walked away from that confrontation alive! Can you imagine? Reminding ourselves that God delivered Israel through the judges, God was behind this victory. But He did so through this man. It reminds us of a truth taught by Paul, “…If God is for us, who can be against us?” (Rom. 8:31). When we face spiritual foes, God’s enemies, we don’t use weapons of the flesh (2 Cor. 10:4). Yet, God guarantees the outcome. Through John, He says, “You are from God, little children, and have overcome them; because greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world” (1 Jn. 4:4). With God’s help and power, you can win victories in battles you have no business engaging in!
  • He was useful–Judges 3:31 says he saved Israel. Judges 5:6 says he did his work in adverse times, when the highways were abandoned and travelers kept to the byways. While he gets but a footnote in history, what a legacy! There was a problem and he worked with God to provide a solution. The idea of a judge is of a savior. God saved the people through Shamgar. He had the freedom of choice, and he chose to save the people. Galatians 6:10 urges us all, “So then, awhile we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith.” You are valuable to God, but you must use what you have while you can to do all you can for Him! Just like Shamgar did!

When Pity Becomes Partiality:

The Difference Between True Mercy and False Compassion

Brent Pollard

Of the two kinds of compassion, only one heals.

That statement may seem harsh. We treat empathy as an absolute good; questioning it feels wrong. Surely, to feel another’s pain and consider his burdens is right. Yes, since if we lack compassion, we miss the heart of Christ. Our Lord, seeing the crowds, “felt compassion for them, because they were distressed and dispirited like sheep without a shepherd” (Matthew 9.36). But to heal, compassion must be joined with truth.

Scripture does not let us rest in sentimentality; instead, it warns us: even pity can be corrupted. Unless compassion is anchored in truth, it can fail to bring healing. It may even harm those it aims to help. Thus, true compassion requires moral clarity.

The Surprising Command of Exodus 23.3

If we wrote the Law, we might warn against favoring the powerful. God does warn about that, but He also says: “Nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his dispute” (Exodus 23.3). The scales tip both ways. Leviticus puts it even more clearly: “You shall do no injustice in judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor nor defer to the great, but you are to judge your neighbor fairly” (Leviticus 19.15).

There is a steel beneath the velvet of biblical mercy. Justice does not consult feelings for either party. Instead, justice seeks what is true, what is right, who has been wronged, and what must be done. These considerations stem from love that refuses to be sentimental.

The Modern Confusion

Consider a story from the news. A young woman did not cooperate in prosecuting her attacker because she believed his ethnicity and background already disadvantaged him. By today’s standards, this instinct looked like mercy. Yet the man was later accused of another attack, one that left a teacher dead.

The second victim now has a story. So does his family. So does the community that lost a teacher. Compassion that loses sight of the innocent has not become more loving. It has become morally disordered.

Modern empathy bends toward the offender. It explores his wounds and childhood, seeking causes for violence. These questions have value. But understanding does not absolve. Explanation does not exonerate. A painful past may explain wounds, but it does not permit wounding others.

The Abomination God Cannot Tolerate

Proverbs gives the verdict with thunder: “He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, both of them alike are an abomination to the LORD” (Proverbs 17.15). The symmetry matters. Excusing the guilty is, to God, the moral twin of accusing the innocent. Both invert the universe. Both call evil good and good evil (Isaiah 5.20). Both grieve God’s heart.

What we excuse, we multiply. “Because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed quickly, therefore the hearts of the sons of men among them are given fully to do evil” (Ecclesiastes 8.11). When consequences vanish, the heart interprets silence as license. Any honest parent knows: a child never corrected grows entitled, not grateful. Discipline is not love’s enemy. It is love bearing responsibility for tomorrow.

The Mercy That Is Not Sentimental

Look at Jesus. No one loved sinners as He did. He ate with tax collectors. He touched lepers. He received the broken, whom respectable people threw away. Yet His mercy never treated sin as harmless. To the woman caught in adultery, He said, “I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more” (John 8.11).

There is the mercy: “I do not condemn you.”

There is the truth: “Sin no more.”

We dare not unstitch what Christ wove together.

Zacchaeus is the same picture from another angle. Grace entered his house and stayed, overlooking his past. In response, Zacchaeus stood and said, “If I have defrauded anyone of anything, I will give back four times as much” (Luke 19.8). True mercy does not erase responsibility. It awakens it.

False Mercy in Daily Life

We practice false mercy often. We let loved ones keep lying, raging, neglecting, or harming because they have suffered. We call our silence patience, but it is fear. We call avoidance compassion, but it is cowardice. We tell ourselves love means never confronting or naming what is wrong.

But suffering gives no man moral immunity. The wounded can become wounders. Pretending otherwise does no kindness to him or those he may harm.

This is true in the church, too. That is not cruelty. That is wisdom, walking in the fear of the Lord.

The God Who Holds Mercy and Justice Together

We worship a God who declares Himself “compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in lovingkindness” (Exodus 34.6). In the next breath, He says He “will by no means leave the guilty unpunished” (Exodus 34.7). Mercy and justice are not strangers in heaven. They meet at Calvary, where God proved Himself “just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (Romans 3.26).

To behold that cross is to learn how mercy looks on earth. There, sin was named with terrible honesty and forgiven with infinite love: at the same moment, by the same act, in the same Savior. We will never craft a mercy that surpasses this.

A Mercy Worth Practicing

The question is not about being compassionate; we must be. The real test is whether our compassion remains disciplined by righteousness: caring for the offender without neglecting the victim, forgiving without dismissing consequences, and being tenderhearted without succumbing to naïveté.

A Christian heart should be soft, but never spineless. Merciful, but never morally confused. Willing to weep over the sinner, and yet willing to stand between him and the people he would harm.

Mercy does not call evil good. Mercy does not abandon the innocent. Mercy does not flatter the sinner into destruction.

True mercy tells the truth, protects the vulnerable, calls the sinner to repentance, and leaves room for grace to do what sentimentality never can.

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

What About Demon Possession?

Carl Pollard

The Bible clearly teaches that Satan is real, active, and dangerous. While there’s debate about whether demon possession still occurs today in the same way it did during the ministry of Jesus and the apostles, Scripture leaves no doubt that the devil still seeks to influence people toward sin, destruction, and rebellion against God.

During the earthly ministry of Jesus, demon possession was a visible reality. The Gospels record numerous accounts of individuals being possessed by demons, often causing destructive behavior, supernatural knowledge, physical harm, or loss of control (Mark 5:1–20; Luke 8:26–35). Jesus cast out demons as a demonstration of His divine authority and as evidence that the kingdom of God had come (Matthew 12:28).

These miracles also confirmed the truth of the gospel message. Hebrews 2:3–4 explains that God bore witness to the message through “signs and wonders and various miracles.” Demon possession and miraculous casting out of demons played a role in confirming Christ’s authority and the authority of His apostles.

At the same time, the Bible teaches that Satan’s influence extends beyond literal possession. Ephesians 2:1–3 describes sinful humanity as walking “according to the prince of the power of the air.” Satan influences the world through temptation, deception, fear, pride, anger, and sinful desires. Jesus called Satan “a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44). Peter warned Christians to remain alert because “your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:8).

This means that when people give themselves over to hatred, violence, wickedness, or rebellion, they’re often allowing themselves to be influenced by Satan’s work in the world. James 3:14–16 says jealousy, selfish ambition, and disorder are “earthly, unspiritual, demonic.” In that sense, evil behavior can absolutely reflect satanic influence.

However, Scripture also teaches personal responsibility. Satan tempts, but he doesn’t force people to sin. James 1:14 says each person is “lured and enticed by his own desire.” The devil works through temptation and deception, but individuals still choose whether to follow the flesh or obey God.

Christians should avoid two extremes. One extreme is denying Satan’s activity altogether. The other is blaming every sinful action or emotional struggle on demons. The Bible calls believers to be sober-minded, spiritually alert, and grounded in truth.

The good news is that Christ has ultimate authority over Satan. Colossians 2:15 says Jesus “disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame.” Christians don’t have to live in fear. Through God’s Word, prayer, faithfulness, and submission to God, we can resist the devil. James 4:7 says, “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.”

Satan is real. Spiritual warfare is real. But so is the victory of Christ! 

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

It’s A Miracle!

Gary Pollard

It is tempting to believe that an incredible recovery, acquisition of a needed job or asset, or escape from a major life issue is an example of the miraculous. In the religious world, a miracle is something a few believe can be invoked with prayer, a special religious service, or even a social media post (“pray that ______ will be healed by a miracle from God”).

Despite living in an age where notions of the supernatural are considered unscientific or are chalked up to circumstances we simply don’t understand yet, there is still much confusion surrounding the miraculous.

Miracles served a specific purpose both in the Old and New Testaments: they were designed to glorify God. Parting the Red Sea, striking a rock to get water, a talking donkey, an endless supply of oil and flour, the sun standing still, and all of the other miracles were – by design – impossible to perform without divine help. The Hebrew word for miracle meant “a sign or wonder” (Hebrew & Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament). Its purpose was to prove to the recipient that God was in control, was all powerful, was perfect, righteous, to be feared, and to be obeyed. Miracles were also used to prove that someone’s message was actually from God or that God was with them.

In the New Testament, miracles served to prove that Jesus was the Son of God and that the Apostles’ message was certainly from God. Water was turned into wine, the dead were raised, sicknesses were healed, people who were uneducated could suddenly speak multiple languages, predict the future, read someone’s mind, etc. The Greek word for miracle meant “a deed that exhibits the ability to function powerfully” (BDAG 263). These deeds were impossible to perform without God’s help, and they served a specific purpose: to prove that a message came from God, or to prove that a purpose originated with God.

While it certainly is a nice sentiment that an otherwise unlikely recovery or escape is an example of the miraculous, it’s important to remember that miracles served a specific purpose no longer relevant to our time. We no longer need miracles to prove our message comes from God because we have His complete and perfect word in scripture (I Corinthians 13).

Not having miracles in our world may be a downer to some, but we have this to look forward to: a place without sin for those who die faithful (II Peter 3.13). A place without death for those who die in Christ (Revelation 20.14). A place without sorrow for those who sleep in God after a lifelong battle in this sinful world (Revelation 21.4).

Miracles existed because this world is fallen (Romans 8). Their purpose was to demonstrate God’s power over Satan and sin in a world characterized by all that cannot coexist with goodness. Those who are living life in view of the next find hope and comfort in the miracle of Scripture, the miracle that will bring us home if we follow it.

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Beware Of Bindweed!

Neal Pollard

Despite drought conditions, we have something growing heartily in our yard. Over the years, I’ve tried to kill it at the roots and find where it is growing. But, it seems more vigilant than I am. Therefore, it is more prolific than ever. It’s a frustrating problem!

I’m referring to Hedge Bindweed, also known as Rutland beauty, wild morning glory, Bugle vine, and Granny-pop-out-of-bed. According to the Washington State University extension, its seed can remain viable in the ground for 50 years! It can spread up to 15 feet and develop deep, strong roots and it can regrow its shoot system in just three weeks (https://smallgrains.wsu.edu/weed-resources/common-weed-list/field-bindweed/). Needless to say, you have got to stay on top of eradication if you ever hope to be successful.

Have you ever observed how there are things in your life that operate that way? Have you ever had a persistent sin struggle, thoughts, attitudes, temptations that you had to continually fight? Perhaps you thought you had conquered it, then in a battle or test you find that it is still there. 

This reminds me of a warning issued by the writer of Hebrews, when he said, “See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled” (12:15). Just like Ezekiel describes Jerusalem as a useless vine (17:1-10), there are sin problems that can sprout and spread and send out branches. 

Here’s how it works. We succumb to pride, lust, jealousy, anger, worry, fear, bitterness, or a similar noxious spiritual weed and it takes root in our heart. We feed it, reinforce it, and cultivate it. Or, perhaps, we neglect to remove it and cut it out. Either way, it takes over and even changes who we are. This is not a minor trifle or nuisance. Look in the Bible at individuals like Esau, Joseph’s brothers, King Saul, the scribes and Pharisees who opposed both Jesus and Paul, and you will see how treacherous and deadly these attributes become when they bind to our hearts! 

It is most like the thorns in Jesus’ parable of the soils (Mark 4:7), with struggles like worries, deceitfulness, and unrighteous desires choking out the word (Mark 4:18-19). If unchecked, these things can be likened to “bindweed.” They attach themselves to our hearts and minds and they prevent us from being spiritually fruitful. Have you ever seen how jealousy changes a person? Or what pride does in one’s life? How lust dominates and turns one to depravity? More to the point, is there something like this growing in your heart?

The solution is to root it out! Don’t stop with a single effort. It may be a daily battle for the foreseeable future, but keep at it! The moment you relax and think it’s gone, it will begin growing again. Genuinely repent and ask God to help. He has promised to help renew our minds (Romans 12:2). That spiritual invader does not have to win. God wants to help us eradicate it. His Word and His power provide the means! Get the right tools and get to work on killing whatever unhelpful, unholy thing may be spreading in your heart! 

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

The Anti-Apocalypse: How We Learn to Love Our Own Ruin

Brent Pollard

A Cancer Ward, a Streaming Service, and a Strange Suspicion

A previous biographical sketch on this site once noted, along with my work in the Lord’s vineyard, my fondness for anime. Perhaps the two should be mentioned together, as one helped carry me through a period that challenged the other. I came back to anime in 2010, in the middle of cancer treatment, when chemotherapy left me with long, slow afternoons that needed something to fill them. Sixteen years out from chemotherapy, anime has remained a faithful companion.

I mention this because the human mind is a connecting organ. So it was that, sitting alone with three quiet little anime, I began to suspect I was looking at an emblem of something the church has long known.

Three Cute Apocalypses

The first program followed two young women crossing a ruined Japan on an electric-converted Yamaha Serow. Mount Fuji smolders on the horizon, the sea has crept up over the cities, Tokyo lies underwater, and a clean little notch has been taken out of the moon. Across this wreckage, two adorable protagonists travel happily, retracing the journey an older sister once made on her motorcycle years before the unidentified apocalypse.

The second is Girls’ Last Tour: two girls crossing a dying planet. Cities exist in stacked layers. Resources are scarce; humanity is dwindling after a long war. The title gives away that there will be no happy ending. The protagonists’ sense of wonder is the only thing keeping the bleakness from swallowing the screen.

The third belongs to “School Live!” Cute girls, “School Living Club” activities, school uniforms, slice-of-life rhythms. Then the first episode ends, and the curtain pulls back, and the viewer learns the real reason these girls live at school: zombie apocalypse.

These three programs are not the problem. They are the picture. What they portray is something the deceiver has been doing to human souls since Eden.

The Tempter’s Real Target

Imagine, as in the Screwtape Letters, a senior devil instructing his apprentice in the fine art of ruining a human soul. If such a tempter were to leave behind a strategic manual, its first principle would not be dramatic sin. Dramatic sin wakes the Patient up. The senior devil prefers the unspectacular road: gradual, gentle, and with no warning markers.

What this means is that the tempter’s real target is not your behavior. It is your perception. He does not need you to commit specific acts; he needs you to lose the categorical sense that your condition is a calamity. Strip a soul of its capacity to recognize ruin as ruin, and you no longer need to drag it anywhere. It will arrange the wreckage into furniture and call the result home.

Paul names what is at stake: “the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ” (2 Corinthians 4.4). The issue is not what the world contains. It is what the soul can still see.

Renaming the Ruin

The deceiver’s first instrument is language. He works on words because once a thing has been renamed, it is more than half-tolerated. Cowardice becomes “tact.” Lust becomes “love.” Pride becomes “self-respect.” Sin becomes “struggle,” then “identity,” then “authenticity.” Confession becomes “vulnerability.” Repentance becomes “growth.” He does not need to convince you that virtue is wrong. He needs only to file virtue under a new name until you no longer recognize it.

This is the mechanism Isaiah indicts: “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil” (Isaiah 5.20). And the relabeling rarely stops at vocabulary. It works its way down into the moral hierarchy itself. Slowly, what is trivial gets ranked as urgent, and what is eternal gets ranked as optional. Worship becomes inconvenient; entertainment, sacred. Sin gets dignified as “self-care”; sanctification gets dismissed as “repression.”

Peace, Peace—When There Is No Peace

Renaming is the front door of the deceiver’s craft. The back door is quieter and safer. It is the cultivation of false peace.

God has built into the soul a system of moral alarms—guilt, unease, the prick of conscience, the holy disquiet that drives a sinner to repentance. The tempter knows it. So his task is to disable the alarms one at a time without the Patient noticing. The Patient must feel “fine.” Not convicted, not hungry for righteousness, just settled. By the time the fire is well underway, no warning will sound.

Jeremiah saw this in his own day: “Peace, peace,” they say, “but there is no peace” (Jeremiah 6.14). That is the tempter’s perfected anesthesia. It is not the absence of trouble. It is the absence of the alarm that trouble would normally produce.

The writer of Hebrews calls the cumulative effect hardening: “encourage one another day after day… so that none of you will be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin” (Hebrews 3.13). Hardening is what gradualism produces and what false peace seals.

At Home in the Wreckage

Here is the move toward which all the deceiver’s other moves converge. The Patient is not merely to be made passive in the face of his ruin. He is to be made comfortable in it. He is to set up housekeeping in the wreckage, hang curtains, learn the routines, and at last feel possessive of his own corruption.

That is the picture the cute apocalypses I referenced offers in miniature. The wreckage stays exactly as wrecked as it ever was. What changes is the inhabitant who has learned, through gentle banter and pastel design and slice-of-life rhythm, to find the wreckage cozy.

But the deceiver’s program is not confined to a screen. He invites the addict to call his addiction “the way I unwind.” He invites the angry man to call his rage “passion.” He invites the husband who has stopped praying with his wife to call the silence “our season.” He invites the church that has stopped weeping over sin to call the dryness “maturity.” Each of these is a wreck with curtains hung in it.

The deceiver does not need to drag a soul to perdition against its will. He needs only to keep redecorating the surroundings until the soul no longer perceives the surroundings as ruin.

Apocalypse and Renewal

There is a word for what the tempter is preventing: apocalypse. In its biblical sense, it means unveiling. Biblical apocalypse is the genre in which moral perception is restored—the veil lifts, reality shows itself, the soul sees what it has been standing in.

The deceiver’s mode is the structural opposite: anti-apocalypse, the patient’s thickening of the veil. The wreckage stays real; only the alarm is removed. The room is still on fire; the man no longer smells smoke.

If perception is the battlefield, then the gospel’s counter-strategy is a battle for perception: “do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12.2). The renewing of the mind is the Lord’s apocalypse in miniature. It is the steady rolling back of the deceiver’s veil, until the soul once again sees ruin as ruin—and the cross of Christ as the only place where ruin is ever truly undone.

Awake, Sleeper

So the question this article finally puts to each of us is not what cute media is doing to our sense of evil. That is at most a downstream caution. The deeper question is the question every soul has to face, sooner or later, in the searching light of Scripture:

Where am I no longer alarmed, where alarm was once native? What sins do I now name with softer language than the Bible uses? What atmospheres have I grown so accustomed to that I have stopped asking whether they belong to a redeemed life? What have I learned to call peace that may, on examination, be the deceiver’s anesthetic? What corner of my life have I been quietly furnishing for years, never noticing that the walls were already on fire?

The summons is the same one Paul lifted from an old hymn of the church: “Awake, sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you” (Ephesians 5.14). Those words were not addressed to the world. They were addressed to the church.

May God, in His mercy, lift the veil. May He restore to us the sense of catastrophe where catastrophe is real, the sense of glory where glory is present, and the holy alarm by which a soul still knows when something has gone terribly wrong. And may He keep teaching us, day after day, to see the only One in whose face the light of glory shines—the Lord Jesus Christ, in whom the wreckage of this world is at last truly made new.

Work At It With All Your Heart

Neal Pollard

That command was given to the Christian slave in the first-century world. It is a convicting call for an approach to life that would have been as unusual then as it is today.

Paul writes, “Bondservants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh, not with eyeservice, as men-pleasers, but in sincerity of heart, fearing God. And whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord and not to men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance; for you serve the Lord Christ. But he who does wrong will be repaid for what he has done, and there is no partiality” (Colossians 3:22-25, NKJ).

Paul returns to the overriding thought he preceded this section with, saying, “And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him” (17). Every group he addresses–wives (18), husbands (19), children (20), parents (21), slaves (22-25), and masters (4:1)–is given a command that would have gone against inclination, preference, emotion, and desire. Yet, since this is divinely-given instruction, we must submit to God’s authority and do it.

Do you notice the how of the command for the slave to obey his master? Do it thoroughly–“in all things.” Do it sincerely. Do it fearfully (obeying them, but fearing God). Do it heartily. Do it purposefully–“as to the Lord and not to men.” Do it prospectively, in view of the heavenly reward. Do it fearfully, acting with an eye toward God’s eternal justice.

In the middle of this instruction, Paul instructs them to do it “heartily.” The NIV has “all your heart.” The word is psuche, found over 100 times in the New Testament. Depending on context and translation, it may be rendered “life,” “mind,” “heart,” or, most usually, “soul.” In the greatest command (Matthew 22:37), it is “soul.” It is the inner self. What is Paul saying to do?

From the essence of your being, work with all your might and with everything you have. Beyond just your emotions or feelings, empty yourself out in accomplishing your tasks. Engage your strength and strain, wringing yourself out to get the work done.

So often, it has been observed that the parallel to the slave addressed in Colossians 3:23 is the employee of today’s world. Contrast what Paul calls for with the lazy, lackadaisical, lethargic way so many approach their work. Whether the one who feels entitled to a paycheck but not engaged in purpose or prefers to get by with as little effort as possible, such a work ethic won’t work with the ultimate Supervisor. He tells us HE is the One we ultimately work for. How does that realization change our approach to the daily grind?

What’s on your to do list today? Whatever it is, “Work at it with all of your heart!”

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Who Was Elihu in the Book of Job? The Forgotten Voice Before the Whirlwind

Brent Pollard

Imagine the scene: three friends have argued themselves hoarse. Job has wrung every drop of grief from his heart. The conversation settles into that uneasy silence when men have said too much and helped too little. Then, without preamble, a young man steps forward to speak. His name is Elihu. Until Job 32, no one in the book has even breathed his name.

An Unexpected Fourth Voice in Job

Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar are introduced when they arrange to visit Job (Job 2.11). They arrive, mourn, and argue together. Elihu, by contrast, appears with no warning. He seems to have been present, listening and growing more agitated with each speech. The text never signals his presence; he is simply there.

Why Some Scholars Doubt Elihu’s Place

Within academia, Elihu’s abrupt appearance has prompted many to dismiss him as an interpolation—a later editorial addition to the text. Their reasoning is straightforward: since he wasn’t mentioned at the beginning and the narrative flows without him, they argue he does not belong.

Yet, tidy is not the same as true. Before handing Elihu over to scholars ready to cut him from the Bible, consider three crucial arguments for his place in the narrative.

Elihu’s Genealogy: A Family Tied to Abraham

The author of Job states who Elihu is: “Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the family of Ram” (Job 32.2). This is presented as verifiable information, not fiction.

The name Buz is not random. When Abraham received word about his brother Nahor’s family, he learned that Nahor had eight sons by his wife, Milcah. The second of those sons was Buz (Genesis 22.21). Elihu the Buzite is thus a descendant of Abraham’s nephew. He is, in the broadest sense, a member of the patriarchal family.

A storyteller inventing a character would not connect him to a well-known family line. The genealogy suggests factual detail rather than fiction.

The Land of Uz and Why Elihu Lived Nearby

Nahor’s firstborn son was named Uz (Genesis 22.21). Job lived in the land of Uz (Job 1.1). The connection is not accidental. As firstborn, Uz would have inherited his father’s holdings. Nahor held enough standing that an entire city bore his name (Genesis 24.10). It’s no surprise if his eldest son had similar honor.

This explains what might seem puzzling. Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar had to travel to reach Job. They came from elsewhere. Elihu, as a Buzite, likely lived in the area where the events unfolded and may have been distantly related to Job. He was a local. That is why he is introduced without explanation—he was already there.

Inspiration Settles the Question

Suppose Elihu’s chapters were added later. Even so, we cannot dismiss his words. The men who wrote the Old Testament were not speaking on their own; they were guided by the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1.20-21). Whatever they wrote, they did so under God’s guidance (2 Timothy 3.16).

The Bible is not a collection of human opinions. It is the inspired, inerrant word of God. No editor inserted Elihu into the canon by mistake. If Elihu’s six chapters are in the Bible, it is by divine intention.

The Bridge to the Whirlwind

What is Elihu doing there at all? Read the book without him, and you will feel the absence of a voice that bridges the arguments of Job’s friends and God’s response. Read the book with him, and you see how Elihu uniquely prepares both Job and the reader for the encounter with God. He stands as a distinctive mediator, introducing themes and tensions that the others miss.

Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar exhausted themselves accusing Job of secret sin. Their theology was a calculator: suffering equals punishment, righteousness equals reward, no exceptions allowed. They were wrong, and God Himself rebukes them at the book’s close (Job 42.7).

Elihu is different. Unlike the others, his role is to respond not with accusations about Job’s character or secret sins, but by addressing the words Job has spoken in anguish. Those words have grown sharp and have begun to question the goodness and justice of God. Elihu’s complaint is not about Job’s life. It is about Job’s mouth.

And in that complaint, Elihu is not entirely wrong. Job had begun to speak presumptuously. He began demanding an audience with God, as if he could match Him in a courtroom. Elihu sees this clearly and says it plainly. A man may be righteous and still grow arrogant in the face of suffering. A man may suffer unjustly and still answer his God unwisely.

What Elihu’s Words Reveal About God

Notice what Elihu does next. After correcting Job’s tongue, he turns to talk about God. He mentions God’s majesty, wisdom, and control over cloud, lightning, and rain (Job 36.26–37.13). He describes the storm on the horizon: “Around God is awesome majesty” (Job 37.22). As Elihu finishes, the storm breaks. “Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said…” (Job 38.1).

What a transition. Elihu’s role is not to steal God’s thunder but to announce it. He is the herald who speaks before the King appears. While the friends pointed Job inward, asking him to examine sins he never committed, Elihu points upward, lifting Job’s eyes from the ash heap to the heavens as the heavens open.

A Forgotten Voice Worth Hearing

We are quick to skip Elihu. Six chapters from a man who appears suddenly and is never mentioned again—it is tempting to skip ahead to the theophany. But if we do, we miss a crucial bridge in Scripture. Elihu reminds us that even faithful sufferers can speak rashly. God’s silences are not indifferent. The storm we fear may bring the Lord near. When you come to Job 32, do not rush past the young Buzite. Listen. The whirlwind is closer than you think.


Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Wasting Away

Carl Pollard

“So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day…as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen.” 2 Cor. 4:16-18

That opening line says a lot, “we do not lose heart.” Paul isn’t writing from an easy place. Earlier in the chapter he talks about being afflicted, perplexed, persecuted, struck down. He has suffered constantly for Christ. 

Then he says something honest: “our outer self is wasting away.” That’s real life. Bodies wear down. Energy fades. Life gets heavy. Ministry gets exhausting. We don’t have to pretend everything’s fine. 

But he doesn’t stop there: “our inner self is being renewed day by day.” While one part of you is declining, another part can be growing stronger. But this renewal isn’t automatic, it’s tied to where your focus is and who you’re trusting. You can be physically worn out and spiritually stable at the same time.

Paul calls his suffering “light momentary affliction.” That sounds almost out of place until you remember what he went through, beatings, prison, constant pressure. So why call it “light”? Because he’s comparing it to “an eternal weight of glory.” When eternity is in view, even heavy things take on a different scale.

Then he explains the key, “as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen.” That’s a shift in perspective. Most people live anchored to what they can see, their circumstances, problems, and outcomes. Paul says you’ve got to train your focus somewhere else.

The seen things are temporary. That job stress, that health issue, that tension at home, it’s real, but it’s not lasting. The unseen things, God’s promises, His presence, eternity, those are what endure! 

That’s what keeps us from losing heart. Not pretending life’s easy, but remembering it’s not ultimate.

And so, we don’t quit just because it’s heavy. You don’t measure everything by what’s right in front of you. You keep going because you know there’s more than what you can see. The question is simply what we are fixing our eyes on. Because whatever we focus on will shape whether we give up or keep going.


Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Jeremiah Goes To Church

Neal Pollard

In Jeremiah 7, God sends Jeremiah to preach at the front door of the Lord’s house (2). This would have been quite a spectacle as people were entering and leaving the worship services. The crux of his message, which he repeats, was, “Amend your ways and your deeds” (3,5). Jeremiah defines what that looks like.  Notice what the prophet discovered when he encountered these folks who had gone to worship.

They believed that one day of worship offset six days of unrighteousness (4,7-10). Jeremiah lists out the things they would do during the week, then have the audacity to stand before God in the temple and say, “We are delivered!” (10). The modern equivalent might be, “We’re saved, so we can do whatever we want.” Going through the motions of worship is not a substitute for righteous living. God rejects such worship and worshippers. 

They took advantage of the less fortunate (5-6). Jeremiah equates injustice (5) with oppressing three classes of outcasts–the stranger, the orphan, and the widow. All of these were alone and without others to help them. Jeremiah’s brethren saw these as people to take advantage of rather than help. This drew God’s indignation! He has always had a special place of concern for the helpless, poor, and needy. He strongly disapproves of those who refuse to be compassionate toward the less fortunate.

They ignored the lessons of the past (11-15). When Israel first conquered Canaan, the tabernacle rested at Shiloh. The people became complacent and did not think it possible for their enemies to steal the ark of the covenant, but in response to their wickedness God allowed their enemies to defeat them and the ark to be taken. Now, God is saying the same thing will happen to this temple for the same reasons. They thought they were concealing their sinful lives by sheltering at the temple, but because they did not listen to God’s messengers (13) He was going to cast them out. Sometimes, we can look at people of the past and see the fruit of their actions but fail to connect the dots to our own lives. 

Their families were united in idolatry (18-22). Fathers, mothers, and children each did their part to provoke God to anger by replacing Him with other gods. They did what God did not authorize and what He did not want. Their homes were aligned to forsake God. He did not have the place of honor and faithfulness He should have had. 

They went backward and not forward (23-28). Sin is inevitable. We all fall short of God’s glory. But the overall trajectory and direction of our lives should be progression, not regression. But, God says they “went backward and not forward” (24). How did this happen? They did not listen, but stiffened their necks (26). They did worse than their fathers (26). They did not accept correction (28). As the result, truth perished (28).

They sacrificed their children (29-34). This was the last straw. They literally sacrificed their children. He said that He neither commanded such nor did it enter His mind (31). The world has so infected their thinking that they followed it in giving their children to its gods. Is it possible to sacrifice our children today? No, we wouldn’t think of doing so by putting them in the fire (31), but we should examine if our priorities, example, and pursuits are sacrificing them or sanctifying them. 

Jeremiah had a tough assignment. To talk to his spiritual family like this and share such a message was undoubtedly wearying (see 20:9). But judgment was coming and change was necessary. The point of his sermon that day at the temple was that the God they came before in worship was the God who saw them when they left. He took as close notice over that as He did the moments of corporate gathering. What a great reminder for me! I need to be who I profess I am when assembled with the saints. The act of worship ought to be part of the transformation of my heart and my character. Worship is no substitute for righteousness. 


Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Esther: The Divine Play of Providence

Brent Pollard

The Spirit of God, who breathed out Scripture, did not confine Himself to one literary mode. He gave us the measured march of Kings and Chronicles, the soaring verse of Psalms, the pointed brevity of Proverbs, the prophetic thunder of Isaiah, and apostolic letters from a Roman prison. So perhaps we should not be surprised—though we so often are—when we open Esther. There, we find something that reads like a stage play.

Consider Esther 7.7–8. The king storms from the banquet hall into the palace garden. Rage bleeds out of him with every step. Meanwhile, Haman, sensing the ground give way beneath his feet, throws himself upon the couch where Esther is reclining to beg for his life. At that precise moment—not a second earlier, not a second later—the king returns. No narrator interrupts to explain the irony; instead, the characters’ movement tells the whole story. This is not formal stagecraft, but it functions as such. The invisible Hand that arranges such timing is no less present for being unnamed.

A Drama Without a Divine Speaking Role

Here is why Esther is such a curious book among Scripture: God’s name never appears. No “Thus says the Lord.” No smoking altar. No prayer naming the Almighty. And yet, no other book shows providence more plainly.

Think of it this way. When a small child walks through a field at noon, he sees his shadow and pays it little mind. But let him step into a cathedral at dusk, where light filters through colored glass and falls in long slanting columns across the stone floor. Suddenly, he understands that there is a sun. Esther is the cathedral at dusk. God’s name is not shouted from the walls. It is seen in shafts of light falling across every coincidence, every sleepless night, every delayed decree, every gallows built a little too tall for the wrong man.

This is providence working, as it so often does in our own lives, through the timing of ordinary events. Proverbs 16.33 tells us plainly, “The lot is cast into the lap, But its every decision is from the LORD” (NASB95). Again, Proverbs 21.1 says, “The king’s heart is like channels of water in the hand of the LORD; He turns it wherever He wishes.” The book of Esther is the working out of those two proverbs across ten chapters of court intrigue.

Purim: The Feast the Book Was Written to Explain

We must remember that Esther’s ultimate purpose is to account for the origin of Purim, the annual celebration commemorating the providential deliverance of the Jewish people during the Persian Empire. Esther 9.20–32 records how the book’s events became an annual observance. By the intertestamental period, a “Mordecai Day” is mentioned in the non-canonical 2 Maccabees 15.36. Some translations place the reference in the following verse. Purim was therefore an established observance long before Jesus walked the dusty roads of Galilee.

Purim was never one of the three pilgrimage feasts required under the Law (Deuteronomy 16.16). It was a voluntary celebration—what Paul might have called a day one man esteems above another (Romans 14.5–6a). The New Testament itself acknowledges that Jewish feasts existed beyond the three required by Moses. John 5.1 speaks generically of “a feast of the Jews” (NASB95) without naming which one. John 10.22 places Jesus in Jerusalem during the Feast of the Dedication (Hanukkah), which is likewise not a Mosaic requirement. Purim fits within this broader Jewish religious calendar of observances commemorating great acts of divine deliverance.

The public reading of Esther on Purim is attested in the Mishnah around A.D. 200. The verbal cursing of Haman—and here cursing means the expression of ill-will, not profanity—is attested in early rabbinic sources from roughly the third and fourth centuries. An interesting custom crept into the practice during the Middle Ages: audience participation. Every time the reader arrived at Haman’s name, the congregation would boo, hiss, stomp their feet, or employ noisemakers to blot out his name as it was spoken. This practice is well documented in medieval Europe—from France, Provence, Germany, and Italy—beginning in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. It continues in public Megillah readings today. All of which only serves to demonstrate that Esther is not your typical book of the Bible.

The Three Marks of the Drama

If one approaches Esther with a trained literary eye, three features stand out, marking it as something like inspired theater. The events are no less historical for being dramatically presented; this is not fiction dressed up as fact. The Spirit who moved the writer permitted him to employ his considerable storytelling gifts. The result is unmistakable.

Dramatic Irony and Reversal. The plot hinges on reversals a playwright would admire. Most famously, Haman is hanged on the very gallows he built for Mordecai (Esther 7.9–10). It is the oldest dramatic device—and the oldest law of the moral universe. The Psalmist captured it before Haman ever drew a blueprint: “He has dug a pit…and has fallen into the hole which he made. His mischief will return…upon his own head” (Psalm 7.15–16, NASB95). The man who builds a gallows for the righteous measures his own neck.

Symmetry and Scene Design. The text follows a chiastic or concentric structure, in which events in the first half of the book are mirrored and undone in the second half. Banquets answer banquets. Decrees answer decrees. Honors intended for Haman fall instead upon Mordecai. This is not an accidental arrangement. The same chiastic structure appears in the inspired poetry of the Psalms. Psalm 1, for instance, pivots on a central contrast between the way of the righteous and the way of the wicked. What Hebrew poetry accomplishes in a few lines, Esther accomplishes across ten chapters.

Caricatured Characters. The cast of Esther behaves like figures drawn from classical theater. Ahasuerus is the buffoon king, easily swayed by whichever counselor happens to be nearest his ear. Haman is the villain. His pride is painted in strokes so broad that we almost laugh at him before we shudder at him. Esther and Mordecai are the heroic underdogs—Jewish exiles whose courage and wisdom topple an empire’s most powerful man. These are not flat portraits but intentionally strong ones. A story meant to be performed year after year needs characters that an audience can recognize at a glance.

A Liturgical Architect, Not Merely a Historian

Traditional Jewish sources suggest that the original author—likely Mordecai himself—had his work finalized under the direction of figures such as Ezra and Nehemiah. If that is so, then the unique literary shape of the book is not incidental but purposeful. The author was not merely a historian. He was a liturgical architect. He composed a narrative that could be “acted out” by every generation. In this way, the origin of Purim would never be forgotten, and the Jewish people would never fail to remember the God whose name the writer seems almost too reverent to put to ink.

And here we reach perhaps the strangest and most wonderful feature of the book. Esther does not name God, but trains us to see Him. It urges us to seek the Divine Hand in places where the Divine Name is unwritten. It prompts us to notice the king’s sleepless night, the delayed sentence of a queen, the long memory of a royal chronicle, and the villain’s fall at precisely the wrong moment. These are heaven’s brushstrokes on the canvas of human history.

The Book We Are Living In

We live, most of us, in books whose pages resemble Esther more than Exodus. No burning bush blazes in our backyard. No pillar of cloud guides us to work. No voice thunders from Sinai over our Mondays. God’s name is not written across the sky above our cubicles or over the nursery where we rock a sleepless child. Decisions go against us. Promotions reward the undeserving. Haman of our age seems, for a season, to prosper. Faith—if we are honest—is often the harder task of trusting an unseen Hand to arrange a plot we cannot follow. Yet the God who arranged the king’s return to a banquet hall in Susa orders each moment of our lives with the same quiet care. The God who toppled Haman has not lost the ability to overturn the proud. Esther is not just an ancient drama preserved by chance. It is a script the Spirit wrote to teach us to read our lives. When the curtain finally falls, and every hidden thing is revealed (Luke 8.17), we will not be surprised to find that the unnamed God of Esther was the Author all along.

Worry 

Carl Pollard

Worry has a way of feeling productive when it’s actually doing nothing but draining you. You lay in bed and replay conversations. You think through every possible outcome. You try to get ahead of problems that haven’t even happened yet. And somewhere in your mind, it feels like you’re doing something helpful. But Jesus says something very different.

In Matthew 6:27, Jesus asks, “Which of you by worrying can add one cubit to his stature?” In other words, what has worry ever actually fixed? Nothing!  Worry feels like we are somehow in control, but it’s really just fear wearing a disguise.

And if we’re honest, worry isn’t just about circumstances. It’s about trust. That’s why Jesus goes straight to the heart of it in Mattew 6:30, “O you of little faith.” That stings a little, but it’s meant to. Because every anxious thought is a subtle moment where we’re choosing to carry something God never asked us to carry.

The God who feeds birds and clothes the lilies is the same God who knows your situation in detail. He’s not guessing. He’s not reacting. He’s already there. So when we worry, we’re not just dealing with stress. We’re stepping into a role that doesn’t belong to us.

Philippians 4:6 says, “Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God.” That’s not a suggestion for the calm days. That’s a command for the chaotic ones. Notice what replaces worry, prayer! Not overthinking everything, prayer.

And not just prayer, but thankful prayer. Even before the answer comes (like Hannah, smiling and joyful before God even answered her). That means when your mind starts running, that’s your cue. Not to keep thinking harder, but to start talking to God more.

Worry shrinks your world down to what you can see. Faith lifts your eyes to what God sees. You don’t have to figure everything out immediately. You don’t have to solve tomorrow before it gets here. Jesus already said, “Sufficient for the day is its own trouble” (Matthew 6:34).

So handle today. Trust God with tomorrow. And when worry starts knocking, don’t invite it in. Take it to God immediately. Because peace isn’t found in having all the answers, it’s found in knowing the One who does! 

Learning A Lesson From A Lantern

Gary Pollard

I’m a big fan of old fashioned lighting, especially old kerosene lanterns because they’re simple. I went to light one of my lanterns and the flame wouldn’t stay alive for more than a few seconds. I thought, “Maybe the vent is covered in carbon and there isn’t enough oxygen for the flame.” So, I took it apart, cleaned it out, and put it back together. I was sure it was the vent.

To my chagrin, the flame died within seconds even after the lantern was cleaned. Next I trimmed the wick because it seemed too dark; perhaps having a fresh wick would allow the flame to stay alive. It wasn’t a stopped vent, so it had to be the wick. Sure enough, the flame died even with a fresh wick. At this point I was stumped. 

The next day it occurred to me while putting gas in my car: the lantern was just out of kerosene! It was obvious to the extreme. I knew Chelsea would never let that one go. When I got home I put the kerosene into the lantern which, of course, was the solution to a simple problem that I overcomplicated.

This is a mundane example of a profound truth: we make mistakes as humans. Worse yet, some people put words in God’s mouth that He never used. “My God is a God of love – He wouldn’t condemn me just for this one little sin.” “God doesn’t care if we live the way we want.” Some use phrases like this with great confidence while overlooking an obvious truth: God has told us what He does and does not care about in His word.

If we aren’t in the word listening to God and allowing Him to change us, our solutions will end in failure. There was only one solution to keep that flame going in my lantern. There is only one right way to follow God, and He’s told us how to do that! Life will be so much easier for those who look to God for answers before relying on their own wisdom.

 

A King Like The Nations

Dale Pollard

A King Like the Nations — The Warning 1 Samuel 8:20

In the First Book of Samuel, the people of Israel approached Samuel with a mighty bold demand— they wanted a king. Their exact words were, “Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles” (1 Samuel 8:20).

Up to that point, Israel was led directly under God through the judges and prophets. But the people craved something a little more familiar. You know the classics— political power, military leadership, and a visible human ruler. God warned them through Samuel that earthly kings would tax them, take their boys to war, and rule over them in ways they’d regret. Still, they insisted.

Israel’s monarchy began with Saul, followed by the famous (mostly awesome) reign of David and then the wisdom of Solomon. After this, things really fall apart. Literally. The kingdom didn’t remain united. After Solomon, the nation split into two rival kingdoms—the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah. Sadly, what follows are even more of the “classics.” Corruption, idolatry, and political struggles would all eventually lead to their downfall.

The rise, division, and fall of Israel’s kings leaves us with this humbling truth— human rulers are flawed and temporary. No king, no government, and no political system can fully deliver the justice and peace that people ultimately long for.

The story of Israel’s kings points to the big need of a perfectly righteous and eternal king. We aren’t going to get that from anybody in the (oval-shaped) office— but heaven? Name a higher seat of power than the one Jesus sits on. We’ve got our perfect King and we can’t forget that. 


Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Watching A Model Giver

Neal Pollard

There he sat on the pew, then on the floor, then back on the pew again. One of our grandsons and his parents were seated next to us in worship yesterday. After the Lord’s Supper, I watched him. He had some change in the coin pocket of his pants, and I could tell they were meant for the collection plate. He taught me some good lessons about giving in those few moments.

Anticipation. Jude was fingering that money, checking and rechecking to make sure he had his hands on it. I watched him watching for the man who would be handing the tray down the row. His expressive eyes spoke volumes. “Will it ever get here?” “Am I going to miss out on giving?”

Emotion. There was feeling which accompanied this act. You could truly read the joy on his face. When the tray got to him and he suddenly struggled to get everything out of the coin pocket, I witnessed a different emotion. He was visibly disappointed that he didn’t give all of what he intended. Adulation turned to agitation. You could tell this was not a heartless exercise for him.

Conviction. With the aid of his father, he made things right. Within a minute, Dale was carrying Jude back to catch up with the men who had served on the table. However, the collection had already been put into the safe. When Dale explained why they were there, it was explained to them that it was no problem to open it back up so the “young man” could give. In his heart, Jude knew he needed to do this to make right his intentions. He had not accomplished his mission until he gave what he intended.

I was reminded of the children who praised Jesus as He entered Jerusalem in Matthew 21. Jesus quotes Psalm 8 to defend their worship of Him: “Out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies you have prepared praise for yourself” (21:16; Ps. 8:2). Jude reminded me of some important aspects of giving which the Bible outlines. Giving should be planned and deliberate (1 Cor. 16:1-2; 2 Cor. 9:2). It should involve our best emotions (2 Cor. 9:7). We should not be content to do less than the best we can (2 Cor. 8:3-5; 9:6).

Jude was such a good example to me regarding my own giving. Putting a check into the plate takes a mere moment, but it should be preceded by and participated in with the same exemplary characteristics displayed by that eager toddler. How he must have made God smile. That’s what I want my giving to do!

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

Thinking the Best Instead of Assuming the Worst

Carl Pollard

Have you ever waved at someone you know and they didn’t wave back? What conclusion did you jump to? Probably something like, they’re upset with me. We do that all the time. We see a look, hear a tone, notice a decision, and instantly attach meaning to it. We don’t just observe what someone does, we assign motives. Then we start treating those motives like facts.

That’s dangerous, because most relationship damage doesn’t come from what people actually do. It comes from what we decide they meant.

Jesus said in John 7:24, “Don’t judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” He didn’t remove judgment altogether. He corrected it. There’s a right way to evaluate and a wrong way. Assuming motives we don’t know falls into the wrong category.

In 1 Samuel 16, Samuel saw Eliab and immediately thought, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is before Him.” Eliab looked the part. He seemed strong, impressive, kingly. But God said, “Man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” Samuel almost chose the wrong man because he based his conclusion on what he could see. We do the same thing! We speak confidently about hearts God hasn’t revealed. When we claim to know motives, we step into territory that belongs to God alone.

It gets worse. Once we assume the worst, we start building a case in our minds. In Mark 2, when Jesus forgave a man’s sins, the scribes immediately concluded He was blaspheming. They didn’t ask questions. They didn’t investigate. They decided. That still happens today. One action becomes a pattern. One moment becomes a label. We create a version of someone in our minds that isn’t even real.

And a lot of times, we’re not reading people accurately at all. We’re reading them through our own wounds, insecurities, and past experiences. Joseph’s brothers did this in Genesis 50. Even after Joseph had forgiven them, they assumed he’d finally take revenge. Their guilt shaped their interpretation.

That kind of thinking hurts the church. Colossians 3:13 says we’re to bear with one another and forgive one another. Love gives space. Love shows patience. Love doesn’t default to suspicion. First Corinthians 13:7 says love “believes all things” and “hopes all things.” That doesn’t mean love is naive. It means love won’t rush to the worst conclusion.

Before you decide what someone meant, pause. Ask, Do I know this, or am I assuming? God knows the worst about us and still offers grace. We ought to show that same grace to others.

“Staying Faithful Through The Storm”

Eli Watson

A few years ago, a ship was caught in a violent storm at sea.  Waves crashed over the sides, the wind howled, and the crew fought just to stay afloat.  Passengers were panicking—some crying, others praying—convinced they weren’t going to make it.  But in the middle of all that chaos… there was one little boy.  He wasn’t panicking. He wasn’t crying.  He just sat there—completely calm. Someone finally asked him,   “Why aren’t you afraid? Don’t you see what’s happening?”  The boy looked at them and said,  “My dad is the captain… and he’s not worried.”  

The truth is, every one of us will face storms—moments when life feels out of control, when fear creeps in, and when we don’t understand what God is doing.  The real question isn’t if storms will come.  The question is: Will we have faith when they do?

Peter faced this exact moment when his faith was tested (Matthew 14:22–33). In the middle of raging water, Jesus called him out, and Peter stepped onto the water.   But when he shifted his focus to the storm, he began to sink.  Faith doesn’t mean having no fear—  it means stepping out despite fear.  

Most people don’t abandon their faith all at once.  It usually happens slowly—  when discouragement builds, prayers seem unanswered, and doing the right thing feels unnoticed.  So what keeps a Christian faithful when life gets cloudy?  The storm reveals where your focus is.

Paul gives us a powerful example of endurance.  In Acts 27, he was shipwrecked, surrounded by people who had lost hope.  But Paul stayed grounded in faith.  

Galatians 6:9 reminds us:  “Do not grow weary in doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.”  Even the faithful get tired.  Doing the right thing can feel unnoticed or unrewarded—but God sees it.  “In due season” means in His timing—not ours.  

And God has never failed to come through.  The problem usually isn’t that we don’t know what’s right—  it’s that we grow impatient or tired of doing it.

Hebrews 12:1–2 gives us two key ideas:  “Run with endurance” —  The Christian life isn’t a sprint; it’s a marathon.  Trying to rely on your own strength leads to burnout.  

“Looking to Jesus” —  

Endurance comes from focusing on Christ, not circumstances.  When we rely on ourselves, we run out of strength.  But God never runs out.  Mark 4:35–41 shows another storm.  Jesus was in the boat, asleep, while the disciples panicked.  They woke Him in fear, and He responded:  “Why are you so afraid? How is it that you have no faith?”  

The storm didn’t mean God wasn’t with them—  it meant they were focused on the what instead of the who.  Because when the who is God, the what doesn’t matter.  Storms don’t mean God is absent.  True faith is trusting Him—even when He seems silent.

When storms feel overwhelming, ask yourself three questions:

1. Am I praying like I used to?  

   Am I using the connection I have with the Father, or trying to handle everything alone?

2. Am I serving fully?  

   Am I allowing God to use the gifts He’s given me—or taking them for granted?

3. Am I pursuing holiness with urgency?  

   Am I living like my faith truly matters?

Because most of the time, faith doesn’t fail in a dramatic moment—  

it fades through quiet neglect.

But we can continue with hope.   1 Corinthians 15:58 reminds us that our labor is not in vain.  God sees quiet faithfulness.  He sees your unseen sacrifices.  He sees when you keep going, even when you’re tired.  And He gives strength to those who keep their eyes on Him.  The Christian life isn’t about never getting tired—  it’s about refusing to quit.

(We’re grateful to Eli for a great, heartfelt lesson on staying faithful even in our storms.)

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

What Is Vision?

Neal Pollard

It is the ability to see what a thing could be. A carpenter, looking at a tree, sees with a trained eye much more than others can see. With his expert shaping, appropriate tools, and seasoned patience, he can make out of that tree what was once only in his mind. The Lord needs people, from the leadership down, who look at the community, each other, their income, and their abilities and see what could be done. It takes no effort, emotion, or education to say, “It can’t be done!” That’s what is expected. Vision sees what could be.

It is the ability to not obsess over what a thing has been. Due respect is owed to the labors of the past, and due recognition is owed both its successes and failures. The past, however glorious, will have ample samples of both. Yet, the people, plans, and programs of today and tomorrow should not be shackled and chained exclusively to was has been. Vision is not always settling for being “has beens.” “Will be” is what Paul seemed more focused on pursuing (cf. Phil. 3:10-12). Biblical vision recognizes that doctrine cannot change, but methods, technology, tools, and people invariably do. Vision asks how people living in the present time can best reach people living in the present time and prepare them for an endless eternity.

It is the ability to trust in what God can make it be. No plan would succeed without God’s hand in it. I love the prayers where brethren plead, “Help us in the things that are right and defeat us in the things that are wrong.” Among the Bible’s heroes are those who factor God into the plans and say, “We are well able” (Caleb, Num. 13:30). “I can do all things” (Paul, Phil. 4:13), “There is nothing too hard…” (Jeremiah, Jer. 32:17), and “No good thing does He withhold” (the sons of Korah, Psa. 84:11). Our vision can be bold when “our” is God and us! Since God made the sky, the limit exceeds even that! Our giving, our ambitions, our goals, and our sights should be set to reflect our belief in that fact.

Where will we be this time next year? In five or ten years? Vision plays a role in that. Vision attempts to see the unseen, forget the past, and trust the One who holds past, present, and future in His all-powerful hand. With those truths factored in, let us dream big dreams!

Books by the Pollards

A Tiny Spark Snail Mail Club (Kathy Pollard)

The Mighty Hunter: How Nimrod Became the World’s First Archetype

Brent Pollard

When Cartoons Eclipsed Scripture

There is a particular kind of cultural tragedy that unfolds not with a bang but with a punchline. The name Nimrod—once thunderous with the weight of an ancient empire—has been reduced, in the mouths of millions, to a schoolyard insult. Daffy Duck first deployed the name against Elmer Fudd in 1948, and Bugs Bunny later wielded it against Yosemite Sam in 1951, dripping with the kind of sarcasm only a cartoon rabbit can muster. The joke, of course, depended on the audience knowing that Nimrod was a legendary hunter. But as biblical literacy faded, so did the reference. Today, Merriam-Webster’s primary definition of the word is “idiot” or “jerk.” The irony is almost too painful to bear: a figure God saw fit to name in Holy Scripture has been redefined by a cartoon duck.

This should unsettle us. It is not merely a curiosity of language; it is a symptom of a culture that has lost its moorings in the Word of God. When a generation can no longer recognize the names written by the finger of divine inspiration, something far deeper than vocabulary has been forgotten.

A Mighty Man in the Sight of God

Scripture is sparing but deliberate in what it tells us about Nimrod. He was the grandson of Ham through Cush (Genesis 10.8; 1 Chronicles 1.10), and Genesis 10:9 declares that he was “a mighty hunter before the LORD” (NASB95). That single phrase, “before the LORD,” carries an ambiguity that has occupied commentators for millennia. The Hebrew liphnê YHWH can suggest either divine approval—a man operating in full view of God’s favor—or divine confrontation —a man who sets himself up against the Lord. Augustine of Hippo noted that the Septuagint rendering left room for the darker reading. The Aramaic Targum Jonathan went further, rendering Nimrod as “a mighty rebel before the Lord.”

The first-century historian Flavius Josephus connected Nimrod directly to the Tower of Babel, portraying him as the instigator of that colossal act of defiance against God (Antiquities of the Jews 1.4.2). Whether one accepts every detail of Josephus’s account, the trajectory is clear: Nimrod was no mere huntsman tramping through the brush. He was a founder of cities—Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh in the land of Shinar, and later Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen in Assyria (Genesis 10.10–12). He was a man of civilizational consequence, a builder and ruler whose shadow fell across the ancient world.

We must pause here and feel the weight of what is being said. The cities Nimrod built—Babylon and Nineveh—would become the very instruments of God’s judgment against His people centuries later. Babylon carried Judah into exile (2 Kings 25.1–11; 2 Chronicles 36.15–20). Nineveh was the seat of the Assyrian empire that devoured the northern kingdom of Israel (2 Kings 17.5–6). The seeds of captivity were sown in the brickwork of Nimrod’s ambition. God, in His providence, told us exactly who laid those foundations. Nothing in Scripture is accidental.

The First Archetype

Nimrod stands at the headwaters of something enormous. He is, perhaps, the first man in postdiluvian history whose life became a template—an archetype—that later cultures would reshape in their own image. The mighty hunter, the tyrant-king, the rebel who dared to defy heaven: these are not merely Nimrod’s characteristics. They are the raw materials from which countless myths were fashioned.

Consider what happened at Babel. Genesis 11.1–9 records that God confused the languages of mankind and scattered them across the face of the earth. If Josephus was correct that Nimrod instigated Babel’s construction, then the peoples who dispersed from that plain carried with them the memory of the man whose ambition had precipitated their scattering. As they settled in new lands and developed new tongues, that memory would not have vanished. It would have been retold, reshaped, and recast according to the genius of each emerging culture. The hunter became a demigod; the rebel became a tragic hero; the king became a figure among the stars.

We must be careful here, for we walk a line that requires both intellectual honesty and theological conviction. Moses wrote the Pentateuch later than the earliest Mesopotamian scribes committed their traditions to clay tablets. The pagans had the first opportunity to record stories of figures like Nimrod, and they did so with considerable embellishment—most notably in the epic of Gilgamesh, a legendary king of Uruk whose adventures bear unmistakable echoes of biblical narrative, including a great flood (cf. Genesis 6–9). But we must never confuse chronological priority with theological authority. The Hebrew Scriptures are not derivative of Babylonian mythology. They are the divinely inspired, theologically accurate account. What we can acknowledge, without any compromise of faith, is that the nations surrounding Israel were working from the same raw historical events—events they distorted, while Moses, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, recorded faithfully.

Written in the Stars

Perhaps the most striking echo of Nimrod is found not in a library but in the night sky. The constellation Orion has been recognized across cultures as the image of a mighty hunter. In Greek mythology, Orion was a son of Poseidon, a man of extraordinary prowess who boasted he would slay every animal on earth. The earth goddess Gaia responded by sending the giant scorpion Scorpius to kill him. After his death, Zeus placed Orion among the stars at the request of Artemis, the huntress. But Zeus also immortalized Scorpius on the opposite side of the sky, so that Orion is forever fleeing from the creature that destroyed him. His constellation depicts a hunter brandishing a club and shield against Taurus the Bull, accompanied by his hunting dogs, Canis Major and Canis Minor, who pursue the hare Lepus.

The parallels with Nimrod are striking, even if they resist dogmatic conclusions. Both were mighty hunters. Orion was the son of a sea god; Nimrod was the descendant of a man who survived the great Flood (Genesis 6.9–10; 9.18–19). Orion was destroyed by his hubris—the Greek concept of overweening pride that invites divine retribution. Nimrod, according to later tradition, was a man swollen with pride who was humbled by God through the dispersion at Babel (Genesis 11.8–9). The pattern is the same: a mighty man rises, defies the order of heaven, and is brought low.

And the Sumerians saw Orion as Gilgamesh. The Inuit call the constellation Ullaktut—three hunters chasing a bear. In Malay tradition, the constellation is Buruj Belantik, “The Hunter Constellation.” The Navajo saw a young warrior-hunter who provided for his people. The Chinese named the constellation Shen and associated it with a great hunter. Across oceans and millennia, separated by the very confusion of tongues that God imposed at Babel, cultures looked at the same stars and saw the same figure: a mighty hunter. That is, at the very least, a remarkable coincidence.

Providence in Every Syllable

Why does any of this matter? Because the Holy Spirit does not waste words. Every name, every genealogy, every city listed in the sacred text is there for a reason, even when that reason does not announce itself on the first reading. Paul reminded Timothy that “all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3.16, NASB95). The brief account of Nimrod in Genesis 10 is no exception.

At minimum, God was drawing a direct line from the ambitions of one man to the empires that would later discipline His people. Babylon did not spring from nowhere. Nineveh did not appear by accident. Their foundations were laid by a grandson of Ham, a mighty hunter whose name became a proverb and whose legacy became a myth repeated in a hundred tongues. The prophets who later thundered against Babylon (Isaiah 13–14; Jeremiah 50–51) and Nineveh (Nahum 1–3) were, in a sense, addressing the spiritual descendants of Nimrod’s rebellion.

But there is a deeper lesson still. Nimrod’s story is the story of every man who builds without God. His cities were impressive; his hunting prowess was legendary; his name echoed through the centuries in ways that few names ever have. Yet what did it profit him? The tower he built—or inspired—was abandoned. The languages he united were shattered. The people he led were scattered to the four winds. Jesus asked the question that Nimrod’s life answers before it was ever spoken: “For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?” (Matthew 16.26, NASB95; cf. Mark 8.36; Luke 9.25).

The world remembers Nimrod in fragments—a constellation here, a myth there, a cartoon insult in between. But God remembered him whole. He placed Nimrod’s name in the only book that will never pass away (Matthew 24.35; 1 Peter 1.24–25). And He did so not to celebrate Nimrod’s achievements but to remind us that every empire built on human pride will crumble, while the kingdom of God endures forever (Daniel 2.44; 7.14). The mighty hunter has been hunted down by time. But the Word of the Lord stands eternal.

HOW DOES GOD HEAR PRAYER?

Dale Pollard

The most powerful Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) is probably the most famous long-range listening device. It can detect faint sounds like submarine engines or whale calls from up to 3,100 miles away.

The barn owl, arguably, has the best hearing out of all the known animals (the author has no idea how this was determined/tested). Their ears allow them to calculate exactly where a sound is coming from—even in total darkness. They can even hear a mouse’s heartbeat beneath a layer of snow.

Have you ever wondered how God hears every prayer? Jonah prayed to God from the belly of a fish—and God heard (Jonah 2.1-2). At the end of the chapter, we find that God not only heard, but He answered by commanding the creature to release Jonah (2.10).

If humans, created in the image of God, can produce a technology capable of detecting sound thousands of miles away and our minds are a fraction of our Creator– reason leads us to believe that God can do far more. We’ve got examples in nature of incredible detection in the owl and the whale, but even better, we’ve got God’s Word.

“Out of the depths I cry to you, Lord; Lord, hear my voice. Let your ears be attentive to my cry for mercy” (Ps. 130.1-2).

“The eyes of the Lord are on the righteous, and his ears are attentive to their cry” (Ps. 34.15).

“If you do and they cry out to me, I will certainly hear their cry” (Ex. 22.23).

“…and if we know that He hears us—whatever we ask—we know that we have what we asked of him” (Jn 9.31b).