Tag: Christianity

Gary Pollard

(Continuing modernizing translation of this work by one of the early church fathers)

Even though the whole world is divided into many different kinds of functions and offices, we can’t think of it as being in a state of chaos. Just as our single human body has many different components but is held together by one soul, I believe the entire world should be viewed as a vast, living being, held together and sustained by the power and reason of God—as though by one universal soul.

This, I think, is what scripture means when the prophet says, “I am everywhere in the heavens and on the earth. This message is from the lord,” and again, “The sky is my throne, and the earth my footstool.” The same truth is expressed by our Rescuer, who tells us not to swear “by the sky, because it’s God’s throne, or by the earth, because it’s his footstool.” And Paul (the apostle) told the Athenians, “In him we live, and move, and have our being.” 

How do we live, move, and exist in God, unless his power both permeates and sustains the entire creation? How else is the sky called his “throne” and the earth his “footstool”, unless his power and presence fill everything both in the sky and on earth, as Jesus himself said?

So it’s beyond all doubt that God, the Father of all, permeates and sustains the entire world through the full expression of his power. And since we have already seen that the actions and choices of rational beings produced the world’s diversity, we should consider the possibility that this world will have an end resembling its beginning. Just like creation was initially characterized by all kinds of variety, its end will be, too. That same diversity (which seems to have reappeared in this last age) will provide the foundation for the diversity of the new world that follows.

If what we have said so far is true, our next step is to consider bodily existence itself, since the many different life forms in the world cannot exist without bodies. It is evident from experience that material nature allows for change and transformation, and it can take on many different forms. For example, wood can become fire, fire can become smoke, smoke can turn into air, and oil can be transformed into fire. The same process occurs with food. Whether for humans or animals, it’s changed into the substance of whatever kind of body consumes it.

We also observe that water can change into earth or air, and air into fire, or the reverse. Though it would not be difficult to explain these transformations in detail, it will be enough here simply to mention them, since our purpose is to discuss the nature of “matter” itself. By “matter,” we mean the stuff that all things are made of—that which exists as the substratum receiving qualities and forms, and by which bodies themselves exist. 

We identify four such basic qualities: heat, cold, dryness, and moisture. When these four are combined and implanted into ὕλη (hulee) — matter itself — different kinds of bodies are produced. Matter, by its own nature, exists without any of these qualities, but is never actually observed without them. This is because it always has some quality that gives it form.

Because of this, I can’t understand how so many intelligent people believe that matter — which is so vast and is the tool and servant of the Creator, ready to take on whatever forms and properties he wishes — could be “uncreated”. Some say it existed eternally with God (i.e., he didn’t create it), but was simply there by chance. Yet these same men accuse others of godlessness if they deny God’s providence or the world’s obvious evidence of design—while they themselves fall into the same bad thinking by saying that matter is just as eternal as God!

If, for the sake of argument, we say that matter did not exist, as they claim — that God had to have something to create with in the first place — then God would’ve been doing absolutely nothing because he had nothing to work with. They imagine that matter appeared by accident and gave him the raw materials he needed for creation. They say that this substance was conveniently made of just the right stuff for our massive, ordered world, and was even composed of divine intelligence itself!

This line of thinking seems crazy. It’s for people who don’t understand the power and intelligence of God’s uncreated existence. Let me clarify the issue: even if we imagine that matter once didn’t exist, and that God created everything from nothing, why would we think that he couldn’t create matter exactly the way he did— totally indistinguishable from his own power and wisdom? Obviously, if God made matter it would be perfectly built to take on the forms and purposes he intended. So, wouldn’t it be kind of godless to call matter “uncreated” if everything is made by God out of this stuff? 

Gary Pollard

(Continuing modernizing translation of this work by one of the early church fathers)

Up to this point, we’ve been talking about the earth and how it’s arranged. Now it makes sense to look more closely at the earth itself—its beginning, its end, the ways God has guided it between those stages, and even the mysteries some say took place before creation or will take place after the end.

The first clear point is that the world, in all its many changes and conditions, is made up of more than just intelligent and transcendent beings and many different species of each. It also includes animals—wild and tame, birds, and creatures of the sea. It includes places as well: the “sky” or “skies”¹, the earth, the waters, and the air between them, which some call aether. From the earth come all plants and living things born in it.

Since the world shows so much variety, even among intelligent beings themselves, we must ask: what is the reason for this? What caused the existence of such a diverse world—especially if, as we said earlier, everything will one day be restored to its original state?

The most reasonable answer is this: this variety of lifeforms in the world reflects the variety of movements and choices made by those who fell away from their primal unity and harmony, which was the state God created them in. When they were driven out of that original goodness, and pulled in different directions by desires and motives, they transformed the simple, undivided goodness of their nature into many different kinds of minds and ways of life. 

God, with the unlimited skill of his intelligence, transforms and restores all things, no matter how they were made, toward a useful purpose and the common good. In this way, he brings creatures of very different dispositions back into a shared labor and goal. Even though their motives may differ, they all contribute to the fullness and perfection of one world. It is one power that holds the world’s diversity together and directs every movement toward a single function, preventing this vast creation from breaking apart through the conflicts of intelligences.

For this reason, we believe that God the Father, desiring the rescue of all his creatures through the mysterious plan of his Word and Wisdom, has ordered all things so that every spirit—whether soul or rational being, whatever form it takes—is not forced by compulsion into any path against its will. To do so would remove the gift of free will itself and alter the very nature of the created being. Instead, God has wisely adapted their differing purposes to fit the harmony of the world: some need help, others are able to give it, and others create struggles and contests for those trying to grow in moral goodness. This way, diligence is tested, victories are made more certain, and the ranks of honor are secured through the challenges of the struggle.

¹ d est coeli, vel coelorum

Gary Pollard

[This is a continuing translation of Origen’s systematic theology in modern language]

In our understanding, there is no rational creature that cannot choose either good or evil. But this does not mean that every rational being has in fact chosen full pursuit of evil—it only means that they are capable of doing so. For example, every human being could in theory become a sailor, but not every human does. Or again, everyone could learn grammar or medicine, but not all become grammarians or physicians. In the same way, the fact that all rational creatures are capable of evil does not mean they have actually embraced it. Even the devil himself was once capable of good. Scripture tells us that he once lived in God’s paradise, walking among the cherubim. At that time, he was good. He could have pursued goodness, but he pursued evil with all of his power. In the same way, other created beings with the freedom to choose can either continue to do good or pursue evil instead.

The only ones who aren’t capable of evil are God the father, Christ the Word, and his Holy Spirit. God is the source of all goodness. Christ is the living form of Wisdom itself, and Wisdom cannot become foolishness. Christ is Righteousness, and Righteousness cannot become unrighteousness. He is the Word, which cannot become irrational; He is Light, which darkness cannot overcome. His Spirit is holy by its very nature, not merely by practicing holiness—holiness is inseparably built into his very nature, and he cannot be made somehow less holy.

Any other being that is called holy is holy not by nature, but by participation in the Spirit. This kind of holiness can be lost because it’s not intrinsic, but is a gift. The same applies to righteousness or wisdom in a person: these are not built in to our nature, but can be pursued and gained—or neglected and lost. But if we completely dedicate ourselves to wisdom and goodness, we will always enjoy those things to some degree, depending on how seriously we pursue them. God, in his goodness, calls and draws all created intelligences toward that blessed end where sorrow, pain, and grief will vanish forever.

From what we have already discussed, I believe it has been shown clearly enough that it is not by chance or some arbitrary decision that the “principalities” maintain their authority, or that other orders of spirits occupy their positions. Instead, they received their ranks according to their merits. What those specific merits were we do not know, and it isn’t our place to investigate. It is enough to recognize that God is impartial and just, arranging everything according to each being’s progress and merits, as Paul says: “There is no partiality with God.”

So the office that an angel has exists because of its merits. The “powers” exercise authority because of their moral progress. The “thrones” (those who judge and rule) administer justice because of their worthiness. The “dominions” rule not by chance, but by merit. In this way, that great order of intelligent beings in the heavens is organized into a variety of roles and ranks.

The same principle applies to opposing powers. They are usually called “principalities” or “powers,” “rulers of the darkness of this world,” “spirits of wickedness,” or “unclean demons”, and do not hold these offices because they were created evil. They obtained them through their own choices, advancing step by step in wickedness until evil itself became their pursuit and even their delight. These make up a second order of rational creatures—those so consumed by impulse that they are unwilling, rather than unable, to turn back.

A third order of rational beings is humanity itself. From among the human race, God elevates some to the order of angels, according to their progress in virtue. These are the ones who become “sons of God,” “children of the resurrection,” “children of light,” and “sons of peace.” They conquered in every struggle, killed the earthly nature within them, and defeated not only the impulses of the body but even the unstable movements of the soul. By uniting themselves to the Master, they become entirely spiritual, joined to him as one spirit, sharing his wisdom and discernment. At last, they reach a state of perfect spirituality, illuminated fully by God’s Word and Wisdom, and they themselves become indistinguishable in holiness.

We firmly reject, however, the idea put forward by some that souls can descend so far into sin that they lose their rational nature and become animals. Some point to supposed proofs in Scripture, such as the command that both a woman and an animal involved in bestiality should be stoned, or that an ox which gores must be killed, or even that Balaam’s donkey spoke with a human voice. But such arguments are baseless. We do not accept them, for they contradict both faith and reason. In due time, we will explain how those writings should rightly be understood.

Gary Pollard

[This is a continuing translation of Origen’s systematic theology in modern language]

We need to approach the subject of angels in the same way. It isn’t by chance that certain tasks are assigned to specific angels. For example, Raphael is entrusted with healing, Gabriel with carrying out wars, and Michael with presenting the prayers and petitions of mortals.¹ These roles were not given randomly. They were assigned according to the angels’ own merits—the zeal, effort, and excellence each one demonstrated before the world was created. Based on this, some were placed in the order of archangels, each given a specific responsibility. Others were assigned to the lower ranks of angels, serving under particular archangels or leaders. 

All of this was arranged by God—not randomly, but with perfect justice, according to what each angel deserved. So, for example, one angel was entrusted with the church in Ephesus, another with the church in Smyrna. Peter had an angel assigned to him, Paul had his own, and so on for all the “little ones” in the Church—for as Scripture says, their angels see God’s face every day. Likewise, “the angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear Him.” These things are not the result of chance, nor are they due to the way the angels were created—otherwise we might accuse God of favoritism. Instead, God, the just and impartial ruler of all, distributed these tasks according to the worth, goodness, and strength of each individual spirit.

Let us now address those who claim there are different kinds of spiritual natures, so we can avoid the foolish and irreverent myths of people who imagine that heavenly beings and human souls were created by different makers. They think it absurd that one Creator could have made rational beings of such different kinds. But in saying this, they fail to understand the real cause of the differences. They argue that it would be unfair for the same Creator to grant authority to some without merit, while making others subject to rulers. But as we explained earlier, the real reason for diversity among rational beings was not divine favoritism but the conduct of each being—whether they acted with diligence and goodness, or with negligence and sin.

Let’s use examples from human life. Paul and Peter are certainly recognized as men of spiritual character. Yet Paul persecuted God’s church, and Peter, when questioned by a servant girl, denied Christ with an oath. How could these men—who according to those who claim “different natures” must have sprung from a purely spiritual root—commit such serious sins? Didn’t Jesus say that a good tree cannot produce bad fruit? And if that is true, how could Peter and Paul, coming from a “good tree,” produce such evil fruit? Some try to escape the problem by saying it wasn’t really Paul who persecuted, but some other being within him, or it wasn’t really Peter who denied Christ, but another acting through him. But then why did Paul confess, “I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted God’s church”? Why did Peter weep bitterly after his denial? They knew they had sinned, and this shows that the theory of “different spiritual natures” is groundless.

¹ This comes from Tobit 3.17, 12.18; Enoch 9, 20.1-7; Dan 8.16, 10.13, 21; Rev 12.7

Gary Pollard

[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]

In the last chapter, we spoke in broad terms about the nature of rational beings, reasoning through inference rather than laying down rigid definitions. The only exception was where we did our best to discuss the nature of God. Now, however, we turn to matters that should be addressed according to the church’s established teaching. All souls and all rational natures, whether holy or wicked, were created. By their very nature, they are incorporeal, yet still creatures, since God made everything through Christ. As John’s Gospel teaches: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made.”

Paul also describes the created order in terms of classes and ranks. He writes that all things were created in Christ: “In Him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, dominions, rulers, or authorities—all things were created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. He is the head.” The text is clear that everything, whether visible and bodily, or invisible and spiritual, was made in and through Christ. The “invisible things” are none other than incorporeal and spiritual powers. Paul, having spoken broadly of the visible and invisible, then lists the particular categories: thrones, dominions, rulers, authorities, and other such powers.

We have already touched on these things before. But now, moving forward in an orderly way, we must consider the sun, moon, and stars. By inference we ask: should these also be counted among the “principalities,” since they are said to have been created in ἀρχάς—that is, for the governance of day and night? Or should we instead see them only as governing day and night in the sense of providing light, without being true members of that order of ruling powers?

When we say that all things were made by Him, and that in Him all things were created—both in heaven and on earth—it is clear that the things in space, which we call heaven, including the sun, moon, and stars, are counted among these heavenly things. Next, since our discussion has already shown that everything was created, and that among created things nothing exists that cannot be capable of either good or evil, we must ask about a certain view held by some: that the sun, moon, and stars are unchangeable and incapable of becoming anything other than what they are. Many people have held a similar view even about the holy angels, and certain heretics have said the same about souls, which they call spiritual natures.

Let us first see what reason itself can discover regarding the sun, moon, and stars. Is the belief in their unchangeableness correct? To answer, we should first turn to what holy Scripture teaches. Job, for instance, appears to say not only that the stars can be subject to sin, but that they actually are not free from it. He says: “The stars also are not clean in Your sight.” This should not be taken as referring to the brightness or physical splendor of the stars, as if one were to say that a garment is unclean. If that were the meaning, it would unfairly reflect on the Creator: after all, the stars cannot, by their own effort, make themselves brighter or less bright, so how could they be blamed for being “unclean” in terms of their physical substance if they are also not praised for their brilliance?

To understand these matters more clearly, we should first ask: is it reasonable to suppose that the stars are living, rational beings? Next, we should ask whether their souls came into existence at the same time as their bodies, or whether they existed beforehand. We should also consider whether, at the end of the world, they will be released from their bodies, and whether, as we cease to live, they too will cease to illuminate the world.

Though these questions may seem bold, our desire to understand the truth as fully as possible makes it reasonable to investigate them, guided by the grace of the Holy Spirit. We think, then, that the stars may rightly be called living beings, because they are said to receive commandments from God—a characteristic normally reserved for rational beings. As the Lord says, “I have given a commandment to all the stars.” What are these commandments? They are the instructions that each star, in its proper order and course, should provide to the world the amount of brilliance entrusted to it. The planets, for example, move in one type of orbit, while the stars called ἀπλανεῖς (wandering stars) move differently.

It follows that the movement of these bodies cannot occur without a soul, nor can living beings exist without motion. Since the stars move with such order and regularity, never seeming to go astray, it would be absurd to claim that such precise and orderly behavior could occur among purely irrational beings. Jeremiah even calls the moon the “queen of heaven.” Yet if the stars are living, rational beings, we should expect both advances and retreats in their movements. Job’s words—“the stars are not clean in His sight”—seem to point to this very possibility.

Gary Pollard

[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]

We must remember that some beings, who fell away from the original state we spoke of earlier, have sunk so deeply into corruption and wickedness that they are considered unworthy of the kind of training and instruction given to humanity in this life, with the help of heavenly powers. Instead, they remain in open hostility and opposition to those who are receiving that instruction. This is why our mortal life is full of struggles and trials: they are stirred up by the resistance of those who fell from a better condition without even looking back. Scripture calls them “the devil and his angels,” along with the other ranks of evil that the apostle listed among the hostile powers.

Will any of these beings, who now live under the devil’s rule and obey his evil commands, one day be restored to righteousness because they still possess free will? Or has their stubborn and deep-rooted wickedness become so hardened by habit that it has essentially become their very nature? The answer is not yet clear. Perhaps you, reader, may consider it possible that in the end, nothing—whether in the visible, temporal worlds or in the unseen, eternal worlds—will remain entirely outside the ultimate unity and order of all things.

For now, however, both in the visible and temporal realms and in the unseen, eternal ones, every being is placed according to a deliberate plan, in the order and degree that matches its worth. Some may, in the earliest times, and others much later—even after long and severe punishments lasting through countless ages—be improved by this stern discipline. Maybe they will slowly be restored, first by the teaching of angels, and later by higher powers, until step by step they advance to better states. Through this process, they may finally reach the eternal and invisible realm, having passed through every stage of heavenly instruction.

From this, I think we might infer that every rational being, by moving from one order to another, may eventually experience the whole range of states—rising and falling, progressing or failing—according to its own choices and the exercise of its free will. 

Paul teaches that some things are visible and temporary, while others are invisible and eternal. So we must ask: in what sense are visible things “temporary”? Does it mean that they will completely cease to exist in the ages to come, when all things scattered from one beginning are being restored to unity? Or does it mean that, while the outward form of visible things will pass away, their underlying essence will remain, free from corruption?

Paul seems to support the latter view when he says, “The form of this world is passing away.” David says the same: “The skies will leave, but You endure. They will grow old like a garment, You will change them like clothing, and they will be changed.” If the skies are “changed,” then they do not vanish altogether. Likewise, if the form of the world “passes away,” this is not destruction of its substance but a transformation of its quality and appearance. Isaiah also, when he speaks of “a new sky and a new earth,” points to the same reality.

This renewal of sky and earth—the transformation of the world and of the skies themselves—is prepared for those who follow the path we have described, moving toward that final happiness in which even enemies are subdued, and in which God is said to be “all in all.” If anyone imagines that at the end material, bodily nature will be completely destroyed, that view is hard to sustain. For how could so many powerful beings exist without bodies? Only God has the nature to exist entirely without material substance. Others suggest instead that, in the end, bodily existence will be purified and refined until it is like the clearness of the skies, pure and radiant as the aether. Ultimately, however, the truth of how this will be is known with certainty only to God, and to His friends through Christ and his spirit.