Genesis: These Are The Generations (XX)

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XX)

The Destruction Of Sodom And Gomorrah And Rescue Of Lot (19:1-38)

Neal Pollard

Back in the ’90s, I wrote an article entitled, “When Sodom Lived In Lot’s Family.” While I don’t have an electronic copy, the main points and content were adapted by another preacher and can be found here (click here). The thrust of the article was that not only did Sodom bring his family to live in Sodom, but subsequent events show that the influence of that wicked city lived in Lot, his wife, his daughters, and his sons-in-law.

As the chapter begins, Moses writes, “The two angels came to Sodom…” (1; see the discussion from chapter 18 on their likely identity). Lot apparently has gained influence, to be sitting at the gate of the city. Lot, like his uncle, sees something special and important about these city guests as he bows to the ground before them (1). Lot urges them to spend the night in his house, but the angels respond that they will spend the night in the square (2). That Lot knew the city was full of wickedness is implied in his stronger urging that they enter his house (3). Peter confirms this, writing that Lot, “while living among them, felt his righteous soul tormented day after day by their lawless deeds” (2 Pet. 2:8).

Sure enough, after the evening meal and at bedtime, all the men of the city come to Lot’s house and clamor for these men to come out to them “that we may have relations with them” (5). While some have tried to put a different spin on their demand, it is clearly homosexual desire. Both Testaments clearly place the practice of homosexuality in the category of sinful (Lev. 18:22; 20:13; Rom. 1:26-27; 1 Cor. 6:9-11). The very term “sodomy” takes its name from this city. Jude 7 says, “just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.” 

There is further confirmation that their desire is sexual in Lot’s response, offering up his daughters “who have not had relations with man” in place of the angels (8). They are angered at Lot’s rebuff and intend to take the men and Lot by force (9). The angels strike the aggressors with blindness and rescue Lot from them (10-11). They order Lot to gather any from his family that he can muster to flee, since the Lord was about to rain down destruction on these cities (12-13). Lot’s son-in-laws take his warning as a joke and do not leave (14). Despite the great wickedness of the city, including what they endured the night before, the compassionate Lord through the strong angels lead out Lot, his wife, and their daughters (15-16). 

So morally and emotionally compromised was Lot that he does not have the faith or moral strength to flee to the mountains, as the angels commanded. The angels allow them to escape to the little village of Zoar, stipulating only that they not look back at Sodom (17-20). As many of us learned in Sunday school as children, Lot’s wife disobeyed and looked back, “and she became a pillar of salt” (26). Jesus will use Lot and his wife as illustrations about the destruction of Jerusalem, that it will come on an ordinary day (Luke 17:29-30) and one must flee without looking back (Luke 17:31-32). The cities of the valley, from inhabitant down to vegetation, are utterly destroyed with fire and brimstone. 

Abraham looks down from the heights and witnesses God’s judgment (27-28). For Abraham’s sake, He delivers and preserves Lot and his daughters (29-30). But, their moral compass is so distorted (by their time in Sodom?) that the daughters concoct a plan to get their father drunk and commit incest with him (31-38). As the result, both become pregnant and bear sons. The eldest names her son Moab and the youngest names her son Ben-ammi (37-38). From this unrighteous union come the Moabites and Ammonites, nations that would be a thorn in the side of the Israelites. 

What a contrast of legacies! Abraham will be the father of many nations. Lot will be the father of wicked unbelievers. Abraham’s faith is getting stronger. Lot’s faith is weak and imperceptible. Lot disappears from the scene until the New Testament, a footnote in Abraham’s story. Abraham will become one of the heroes of the faithful, the epitome of righteousness. It was more than a choice of pastureland, but it is a contrast of hearts and lives. This chapter should motivate us to consider the spiritual legacy we are leaving with our families. Our decisions and our priorities not only effect our own spiritual fate, but also that of our spouse and children. We do well to revisit “the days of Lot” (Luke 17:30) and “remember Lot’s wife” (Luke 17:32). 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XIX)

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XIX)

The Twofold Mission Of The Three Men (19:1-33)

Neal Pollard

We cannot miss the opening phrase in this chapter–“the Lord appeared to him at the oaks of Mamre”–in connection with the events that follow. The entire episode constitutes a “theophany” (a visible appearance of God to humans) and helps us understand what transpires, including God’s difficult statement in verse 21. 

Abraham is camped at or near Hebron, a city that would have significance among his descendants for multiplied centuries. Sitting at his door, he sees three men approach (2). This appears to be the Angel of the Lord (seen by Hagar in chapter 16) accompanied by two angels (cf. 19:1; see vs. 13). We also do not know if Abraham immediately recognized one of them as being the Angel of the Lord, even though most translations capitalize “lord” (3). He otherwise does not seem to grasp until later that these are anything more than distinguished guests deserving of hospitality (3-8). It seems that through subsequent conversation Abraham is enlightened that these guests are divinely sent and that one of them is the Lord. 

That begins when these men turn the conversation to the subject of Sarah (9ff). They issue a promise that Sarah would have a son when the spokesman (the Angel of the Lord?) returned the next year. Sarah could hear this discussion from inside the tent, where she laughed at the thought of having relations and through that conceiving a child (10-12). The omniscience of the Lord is revealed in His knowing that Sarah laughed within herself (12;15). He appeals to His omnipotence, asking, “Is there anything too hard for the Lord?” (14). He reiterates the promise of a son (14b). The first mission, to promise Isaac, is completed. 

This heavenly entourage rise up and look toward Sodom (16). As they walk that direction, Abraham accompanies them. The Lord says to (presumably) the two angels (19:1), “Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, since Abraham will surely become a great and mighty nation, and in him all the nations of the earth will be blessed?” (17-18). He contrasts the faithfulness of this chosen patriarch with the wickedness of the people of Sodom (19-20). Think about the confidence vested in Abraham to be a righteous father urging obedience contrasted with the weak and pitiful condition of Lot’s household (ch. 19). The sin of Sodom is exceedingly grave, but Abraham would do righteousness and justice.

This heavenly visitation (21) is not suggesting that the Lord will discover anything He did not know. He has already proven His omniscience. It is obviously accommodating. This is a mission of executing judgment, and He is about to go among the people of Sodom and Gomorrah in advance of His punishment. In this context, Abraham shows his compassion for his neighbors and the close relationship he had developed with God (23-32). He urges God not to destroy the righteous with the wicked, and the Lord shows Abraham the great extent of His patience and mercy. We are not told how many people lived in that valley, but if there were even ten righteous people among them He would not destroy it. The second mission, that of informing Abraham of the coming judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah, was accomplished. The two parties part company.

These two missions led in opposite directions. One meant life where none was expected. The other meant death where that was not expected. One would perpetuate righteousness while the other would exterminate wickedness. One would bring a life into existence which would lead to a Savior while the other would end life that was thoroughly immersed in impenitent sin. The same Lord was in control of it all, demonstrating the perfect balance of His flawless character. For the obedient, this meant blessing. For the disobedient, this meant destruction. 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XIV)

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XIV)

Lot And Abram Separate (13:1-18)

Neal Pollard

If you grew up going to Sunday School, this may be one of the lessons you learned as a child. The kernel I remember is that Abram gave Lot the first choice of land and Lot chose the one that looked better; that would cost him, but God would richly bless Abram. As I recall, the takeaway for us preschoolers was not to be selfish and trust that God will take care of us. Not bad, sister Gober!

But, keeping with the context of the call of Abram, perhaps we can glean even more. Let us examine how they got to this point and what significance it has on the overall objective given to Abram.

First, we see Abram’s prosperity (1-4). As we saw, the Pharaoh unwittingly adds to his resources when he thought he was wooing a potential wife. But with all Abram brought and accumulated, it amounted to him being “very rich in livestock, in silver and in gold” (2). He has left Egypt and returned to Bethel, where he had formerly built an altar (3-4; 12:8). 

Second, we see Abram’s piety (4b). Abram was an altar-builder (12:8; 13:4,18; 22:9). No doubt, he influenced his son, Isaac, who would also become an altar-builder (26:25). Abram repeatedly found it necessary, in arriving at some significant point, to call on the name of the Lord. While his faith is still developing, he understands the uniqueness and power of Jehovah. It drives him to his knees in worship. 

Third, we see Abram’s problem (5-7). Sometimes, we refer to “good problems”–dilemmas that grow out of otherwise positive circumstances. That is what happens on this part of the journey (cf. 36:7). Lot and Abram both had so much flocks, herds, and tents that “the land could not sustain them while dwelling together” (6). There was strife between the men’s herdsmen (7), and perhaps it threatened the peace between them (8). Sometimes, growth and progress create problems that would not exist in periods of decline and difficulty.

Fourth, we see Abram’s proposal (8-13). Choosing unity over plenty, Abram proposes that they separate with all their goods and possessions so that each could sustain and provide for their own (8-9). For him, the overriding concern was, “we are brothers” (8). Abram tells Lot that whichever way he chose, he would then chose the other way (9). Lot looked down on the valley of the Jordan and saw well-watered plains “like the garden of the Lord” (10). Lot took all he had with him and went east to the land of Canaan in the cities of the valley (12). There is foreboding in Moses’ summation of Lot’s destination, first alluding to the coming destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (10) and the little city of Zoar where Lot and his daughters will flee during that destruction (10). Second, there is the startling statement: “Now the men of Sodom were wicked exceedingly and sinners against the Lord” (13).

Finally, we see Abram’s prospects (14-18). The Lord appears to Abram and tells him to look in every direction. God promises to give all the land he could see to his descendants, offspring that would be as prevalent as the dust of the earth (16). He tells Abram to walk the land and survey it, with the promise, “I will give it to you” (17). Abram takes his household and belongings and camps in Hebron, where he promptly builds a place of worship (18). 

God is blessing this man of faith, who, in turn, is remembering God and following the ways of God in his dealings with others. God rewards His proper prioritizing, and sees fit to use him in furthering His plans and intentions. God uses faithful, selfless people to accomplish His will. May we have a heart of wisdom which approaches life’s decisions, big and small, with the sole motivation of loving God wholeheartedly and loving our neighbors as ourselves. Out of this drive, we will be people God partners with to do great things to His glory! 

Fighting For Our Fathers

Fighting For Our Fathers

Dale Pollard

Nebuchadnezzar became a beast in some form or fashion because of his pride in Daniel 4. Oddly enough we find out that his grandson, Belshazzar, falls into the same sinful snare in the very next chapter. This makes for more than an interesting story because it serves as an example of a common thread within scripture. The phrase “like father, like son” rings true in a negative way more often than not. It’s surprising to read of the many heroes of the faith who were failures as fathers. It’s almost disheartening to discover that it’s more common to find stories of poor parenting than successful ones. As tragic as these accounts are, it’s a blessing to have and learn from them. Let’s look into a few of these examples. 

Lot (Genesis 19.6-8)

Lot not only chose to pitch his tent outside of Sin City (Gen.13.12), he eventually moved his family into Sodom as well. In chapter 19 we read, “So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, and said, ‘Please, my brethren, do not do so wickedly! See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men, since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof’” (6-8). Not long after these shocking verses, Lot’s remaining daughters take advantage of him in a cave after being saved from Sodom. Clearly Lot wasn’t a great father. 

ISAAC (Genesis 25)

Isaac loved Esau because he ate of his game, but Rebekah loved Jacob (Gen.25.28). Favoritism among parents is not uncommon to read about in scripture but this never seems to work out in the end. Issac was a weak father in other areas as well. He marries a deceptive wife and fails to rule his family in a God-fearing way. 

JACOB (GENESIS 37)

Like father, like son. Jacob shows favoritism towards Joseph and because of this we read the following, 

“Now Israel loved Joseph more than any of his other sons because he had been born to him in his old age, and he made an ornate robe for him. When his brothers saw that their father loved him more than any of them, they hated him and could not speak a kind word to him” (Gen. 37.3-4). 

ELI (I SAMUEL 2.22-25)

“Now Eli was very old, and he heard everything his sons did to all of Israel, and how they lay with the women who assembled at the door of the tabernacle of meeting. So he said to them, “Why do you do such things? For I hear of your evil dealings from all the people. No, my sons! For it is not a good report that I hear. You make the Lord’s people transgress… Nevertheless, they did not heed the voice of their father, because the Lord desired to kill them” (22-25b) 

Eli was a priest at Shiloh, but he was a pitiful parent. His sons, Hophni and Phineas, were allowed to make sacrifices to the Lord but they were known among the community as acting extremely wickedly. They fornicated with women in the tabernacle and stole sacrificial meats from the people. So horrible were they that the Israelites began to “abhor the sacrifices to the Lord” (v.17). 

Young Samuel, who was being raised by Eli in the temple, receives a vision from God who says that He is going to destroy Eli’s boys, but Eli’s response to this news is rather flippant. He says, “the Lord will do what is right according to Him.” Sure enough, the prophecy plays out exactly as God said it would and Eli ends up dying upon hearing of it in I Samuel 4. 

Sadly, Samuel turns out to be a failure as a father as well as the king, David, that he anoints. 

While these accounts aren’t uplifting to read, they serve as humbling warnings to fathers today. If you want to be a faithful father, you’re going to have to fight for it.