Only God knows heart and motives, but we need to guard against a fondness for going after people for their perceived perpetrations. We need to be sure that we are not making mountains out of mole hills, mistaking what offends our sensitivities with what violates God’s will, or making our scruples the standard which others must pledge allegiance to.
Neal Pollard
A Fondness For Flogging
Neal Pollard
Richard Snow authored the book, Sailing The Graveyard Sea, which details the only alleged case of mutiny in the history of the U.S. Navy. There are many interesting circumstances and subplots in this infamous incident, including a failed apprenticeship program, the captain’s literary success, and the sitting secretary of war’s son, accused as the mutiny’s ringleader, and his fascination with piracy. Another notable detail was ship captain Alexander MacKenzie’s fondness for flogging. Snow records that “during his six weeks at anchor in New York, MacKenzie put the colt (a type of whip, NP) to use 422 times, for crimes that ranged from spitting and throwing tea on the deck to blasphemy and ‘skulking'” (69). A former sailor under his charge called out the captain in print for cruel and unusual punishment, saying “he was noted for his cruelty to the men for small offenses and trifling accidents” (ibid.).
Whatever drove MacKenzie to such fanatical levels of discipline (frequent flogging for apparently minor offenses was somewhat characteristic of that era), it would come up in his court-martial and hang over him in infamy. No less than James Fenimore Cooper would serve as his critic in what became known as “the Somers affair.”
Jesus tangled with a group who had a verbal tendency to flog those who would not conform to their views. Even the rulers (Jewish leaders) were intimidated by the Pharisees, “for fear that they would be put out of the synagogue” (John 12:42). To the healed blind man that stood up to them, they rebuked, “‘You were born entirely in sins, and are you teaching us?’ So they put him out” (John 9:34). This was part of their larger conspiracy to intimidate those who believed in Jesus (John 9:22).
No one was a more favored object of their verbal abuse than Jesus. Three times they accused Him of having a demon for accurately calling out their wickedness (John 7:20; 8:48, 52). They accused Him of working for Satan, leading them to blaspheme the Holy Spirit (Mat. 12:25ff). They watched Him closely to find a reason to accuse Him (Luke 6:7). Yet, Jesus had no problem calling them out for it. He says, “You blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel” (Mat. 23:24). Read that entire chapter for a divine assessment of their tactics.
A love and passion for truth is praised in Scripture, but a fondness for flogging is not! Truth must be spoken in love (Eph. 4:15), kindness, patience, and gentleness (2 Tim. 2:24-25), and a spirit of gentleness (Gal. 6:1). Long ago, Solomon had said, “A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger” (Prov. 15:1; cf. 15:18; 25:15). God puts such actions as “disputes, dissensions, factions” in the category of works of the flesh (Gal. 5:20).
Only God knows heart and motives, but we need to guard against a fondness for going after people for their perceived perpetrations. We need to be sure that we are not making mountains out of mole hills, mistaking what offends our sensitivities with what violates God’s will, or making our scruples the standard which others must pledge allegiance to. A faith in the Father’s form of teaching is imperative, but a fondness for flogging is improper!
The news that the good news is for everyone is old news to us, but it is still big news! It does not matter who you are, where you are from, what you have done, or when you hear, the gospel is for you, too!
Neal Pollard
The first time the word “Gentiles” appears in Scripture is in Psalm 2:1 (your translation may have “nations”). Isn’t it interesting that this is a Messianic psalm? According to New Testament writers, the “mystery of Christ” and the “mystery of the gospel” is “that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body…” (Eph. 3:6; cf. Rom. 16:25-27; Col. 1:27). Prophets like Isaiah foretold this (42:1). That’s incredibly important to you and me, since, presumably, the overwhelming majority of not only those who read this but also those who are members of the New Testament church in the 21st Century are ethnically Gentiles. Acts 10 is where it all began. Jesus’ roadmap of making disciples was ultimately heading to this destination (1:8).
THE MAN (1-8). Luke introduces us to the Gentile who will first have the opportunity to hear the gospel. His righteous character is outlined: (a) “Devout” (profoundly reverent), (b) God-fearing, (c) Generous, and (d) Prayerful (2). He will later be described as “Cornelius, a centurion, a righteous and God-fearing man well spoken of by the entire nation of the Jews” (22). His “prayers and alms have ascended as a memorial before God” (4). He is directed by an angel of the Lord to send for Peter (5) who would preach to him (22). He was moral and full of faith in God, but he needed instruction and guidance. Though he was a good, moral man, he obviously needed more than that.
THE MISSIONARY (9ff). Peter is the first to preach the gospel to the Jews (Acts 2). Now, the Lord chooses him to be the first to preach it to the Gentiles. However reluctant he was about the first mission, this mission is far more complicated. So, the Lord gives him a visual to illustrate the legitimacy of this new mission. Peter “saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground, and there were in it all kinds of four-footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air. A voice came to him, ‘Get up, Peter, kill and eat!’” (11-13). At first, Peter refuses on the grounds that such was forbidden under the Law of Moses (Lev. 11:20-25; Deut. 14:4-20). But after divine reassurance and re-reassurance (14-16), Peter seems to get the message (cf. 28). When emissaries from Cornelius arrive to find Peter, he gives them lodging (23) then leaves with them the next day for Cornelius’ home (24).
THE MESSAGE (13ff). Peter has to receive and comprehend the message before he can share it with Cornelius. The message is simple. No person is excluded. No one is unholy and unclean based solely on their ethnicity (15-16). While Peter is trying to connect those dots (17), it begins to make sense to him (19). It will form the launching point when he preaches Jesus to Cornelius and his house (34ff).
The news that the good news is for everyone is old news to us, but it is still big news! It does not matter who you are, where you are from, what you have done, or when you hear, the gospel is for you, too! It is for your family, your neighbors, your co-workers, your classmates, your friends, your enemies–everybody! That may have started in Acts 10, but it will continue until the second coming of Christ. We must remove any hesitations and prejudices we may harbor and see every person through heavenly eyes. It’s our mission and God’s message for every man (and woman).
Some interpret verses like Isaiah 40:22 (“God stretches out the heavens like a curtain”) as suggesting the expansion of the universe. It’s possible that this could simply be taken as poetic license but if the expanding universe theory is correct, then perhaps the poetic description carries some literal significance as well.
Jeremiah states that “the host of heaven cannot be numbered, neither the sand of the sea measured” (33:22), even though the number of visible stars was limited at the time.
But Isaiah 40:22 states that God “sits above the circle of the earth” and this passage has been the subject of intense scrutiny and interesting debate.
Circle Means Spherical, Right?
The Hebrew word for “circle” doesn’t necessarily mean spherical, in fact the word was pretty flexible. It could depict the shape of a compass (Josh. 6.11), or something vaulted, as well as something arched. The question is, could it have been used to refer to something that was/is spherical in shape?
Smart People Seemed To Think So!
We know Isaiah described the sky as being circular— but then there’s Solomon. He possessed an intellect so impressive that I Kings 4.29ff states that, “God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding beyond measure, and breadth of mind like the sand on the seashore…”. He also authored one of the oldest proverbs in the book of Proverbs and It’s here that the word “circle” is used for the third time in the Bible. What’s even more interesting is that Solomon was likely quoting Job (written aprox. 2100 BC).
Solomon wrote this,
“…He established the heavens, I was there; when he drew a circle on the face of the deep” (Proverbs 8.27).
Job wrote this,
“He has inscribed a circle on the face of the waters
at the boundary between light and darkness” (Job 26.10).
To appreciate this mysterious verse even more let’s explore the surrounding verses that dive into the very origin of wisdom.
THE HISTORY OF WISDOM
The Hebrew noun for wisdom is feminine which is likely why wisdom is often referred to as “she” in Proverbs.
Chapter 8.22-31 elucidates her role in creation:
It describes Lady Wisdom as being with God at the beginning of creation, and she’s the one who brought order from chaos. We’re told that she existed (in the mind of God) before the oceans, mountains, and even, “the first dust of the world.”
She’s God’s wisdom, so divine, but this is the part of God that He used to create. It’s like the relationship between a seed and an apple. The skin, flesh, core, and seeds all make up an apple but the seed is the only part that can produce more apples. Wisdom is both distinct from God and a part of Him at same time.
What does this have to do with circles? It was the part of God which was utilized in the creation of a circular earth. Since we know that the earth is not flat, then circle must mean spherical because this isn’t man’s wisdom being discussed here.
The Spheroid Springs
Proverbs 8.28-29
“…when he made firm the skies above,
when he established the fountains of the deep
when he assigned to the sea its limit,
so that the waters might not transgress his command,
when he marked out the foundations of the earth.”
The word used for fountains (or springs, ESV) is also the Hebrew word for “eye.” While it may be a curious coincidence, the human eye, like the Earth, isn’t a perfect sphere, but rather a funny-looking shape called a spheroid. That imagery complements the creation account when one compares the language used to describe how God gathered (bound/collected) the elements, earth and water, into one place (Genesis 1.9-10).
SUMMARY
Earth must be a kind of circle that serves as a fixed boarder between the outer darkness of space (Proverbs 8.27, Job 26.22).
A circle containing the sky above and the deep below (Proverbs 8.28)— must be spherical.
The Hebrew word for “circle” is ambiguous enough that it can describe anything which “goes around” or “covers” something.
“What words do you live by?” That is the question, isn’t it? Everybody lives by some credo or philosophy. Dale shares some unbeatable wisdom from a perfectly impeccable source.
Dale Pollard
“When in doubt at least try to look intelligent.”
“If you can’t be kind then be vague.”
I came across those two quotes after searching for examples of “words to live by.” Those are okay, but Solomon does a little better. Here are some words from the Word you can live by— taken from Ecclesiastes 12.9-14.
GOD’S WORD IS WORTH THE EFFORT
“Not only was the Teacher wise, but he also imparted knowledge to the people. He pondered and searched out and set in order many proverbs.”
Literal meaning of…
Pondered: weighed
Searched out: investigated
Set in order: made a straight path
LIVE BY GOD’S WORD & SHARE IT CAREFULLY
“The Teacher searched to find just the right words, and what he wrote was upright and true.”
GOD’S WORD WAS DESIGNED WITH DIRECTION IN MIND
“The words of the wise are like goads, their collected sayings like firmly embedded nails—given by one shepherd.”
GOD’S WORD ARE THE ONLY WORDS YOU NEED TO LIVE BY
(excuse the poor grammar)
“My son, beware of anything beyond these. Of making many books there is no end, and much study is a weariness of the flesh.”
Don’t exhaust yourself looking for the answers you had the whole time. God made it simple and practical by compiling them into one handy collection.
GOD’S WORD IS EVERYTHING FOR EVERYBODY
“The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man.”
LIVE IN VIEW OF GOD’S JUDGEMENT
“For God will bring every deed into judgment, within every secret thing, whether good or evil.”
Who defines what a man is? Is he defined by physical, intellectual, emotional, and/or spiritual traits? What does the Bible have to say?
Dale Pollard
I wasn’t the only one who grew up playing a game the older kids called “man can.” It was a dangerous game that put your courage to the test and it wasn’t for the faint of heart either. Every participant would lay with their heads together in the form of a circle. Then one would take an aluminum can (occasionally filled with rocks or sand) and throw it into the air. Whoever the can hit in the face became the next lucky player who got to throw the can. This gave the victim an opportunity to get revenge if he had the skill and aim it took to do so.
There are many things men can’t do and not everything a man can do should be done. Thankfully the Bible has plenty of encouraging sections that lead men to consider what a man can and should do.
Have you ever made a list of why God is worthy to be praised? David did, in Psalm 111. Take a moment and explore his inspired, itemized list…
Neal Pollard
WORTHY OF PRAISE (PSALM 111)
Neal Pollard
One of those names that remind me of my childhood love of singing is Tillit S. Teddlie, a prolific songwriter and member of the church of Christ who lived to be 102. His songs have a trademark sound, and we have sung so many of them: “Heaven Holds All To Me,” “When We Meet In Sweet Communion,” “Oft We Come Together,” “Singing Redemption’s Song,” “Hear Me When I Call,” “Don’t Wait Too Long,” and “Into Our Hands.” He wrote about soul-winning and personal devotion, but he also devoted a lot of his hymns to worship. I love his song, “Worthy Art Thou.”
It is said that Teddlie wrote this hymn in 1930, sitting on his front porch on a Sunday morning. He was studying a commentary, Johnson’s Notes, looking for something to put into his sermon. His Bible was open to Revelation, where the elders are before the throne and singing, “Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing” (Rev. 5:11)(biographical info via hymnstudies.blog). Teddlie could as easily have been studying Psalm 111. While the phrase, “worthy of praise,” is not found in the psalm, the psalmist calls for praise and then sets out to show why.
HIS WORKS ARE WORTHY OF PRAISE
The psalm’s writer mentions God’s “work” and “works” four times in this brief psalm. They are “great” and “studied” by those who delight in Him (2). They are splendid and majestic (3). They are “powerful” (6). “The works of His hands are truth and justice” (7). The God who created everything did not step back and cease His activity among men after the creation. The God who calls for our works of obedience sets the example by continuing to work in the affairs of mankind. Whether His natural laws set in motion at the creation, His providential care, His answer to prayer, or His redemption, He is at work! For this, He deserves our praise.
HIS WONDERS ARE WORTHY OF PRAISE
“He has made His wonders to be remembered” (4). These are unusual things beyond human capabilities. It means “to be wonderful” or “to cause a wonderful thing to happen” (TWOT 723). While the psalmist doesn’t mention specifically what these wonders are or give examples, any of the attributes and actions would qualify. The psalmist mentions who He is and what He has done. If we think deeply about those, we are left to dwell on how incredible and awesome our God is!
HIS WORD IS WORTHY OF PRAISE
The psalmist does not confine his praise to God’s nature and activity. There are His precepts (7), His commandments (10), and His covenant (5,9). God’s greatness is found in what He has revealed to us and what that revelation does for us in this life and for the life to come. My maker has seen to it we have the owner’s manual, to help us know how to best live. I am blessed by His truth (7,8).
HIS WISDOM IS WORTHY OF PRAISE
While I must obtain wisdom myself, it is truly a “wisdom from above” (Jas. 3:17). I get wisdom through the fear of the Lord (10). This good understanding, brought about by His Word (see above), helps me avoid the folly of the unbeliever and the heartache of the rebellious.
When I assemble with the saints to worship, I need to have a proper frame of mind. That occurs by intentional preparation beforehand. It helps me to meditate on who God is and what I am about to do in worship. This can help me focus and bring a better offering. There is no shortage of matters to consider. This psalm shows me just a few of the reasons why the object of my worship is praiseworthy!
After nearly five months in the hospital, Brent makes his return to HIS slot, the Friday article! We’re so pleased and excited to have him back and he’s speaking of blessed assurance…
Brent Pollard
A London-based direct marketer of promotional merchandise has a memorable slogan that reflects the trustworthiness of its brand. Just as a trusted marketer’s slogan inspires confidence in its customers, our faith in Jesus Christ gives us even more assurance. We can say we are “Jesus certain” about our salvation.
Believing in someone’s or something’s ability to keep promises brings valuable peace of mind. Spiritually, we have such faith in the salvation promised through obedience to Jesus Christ that we can say we are “Jesus certain.” Here are a few passages that give us this assurance.
Building on this foundation of trust, Peter reminds us that God has given us everything we require for life and godliness (2 Peter 1.3). The essence of this truth lies in God’s word, which contains the precious and magnificent promises that He has graciously bestowed upon us (2 Peter 1.4). We can be “Jesus certain.”
John expands on this idea, reminding us that our confidence is based on the truth of God’s word, as expressed in 1 John 5:13. John wrote his epistle to assure his readers of the precious gift of eternal life that awaits them. The divine message explains the path to salvation with clarity and purpose. As a result, we can be confident in our salvation. We can truly know. We can be “Jesus certain.”
However, this motivates us to study the Scriptures and follow the path of salvation. Peter emphasizes confirming our calling and election (2 Peter 1.10). Paul instructs us to work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:12). We can be “Jesus certain.”
Throughout the scriptures, we find numerous assurances of our salvation: Peter promises us equipped godliness, John emphasizes the certainty of eternal life, and Paul encourages us to work out our salvation. Together, these passages remind us of our unwavering faith in Jesus Christ, of how we are “Jesus certain.”
May we cling steadfastly to our assurance of salvation through Jesus Christ. Let us persevere in our search for wisdom in the Scriptures, embracing our divine calling and assurance with steadfast hearts. As we journey in faith and obedience, let us strive to work out our salvation with reverence and awe, knowing that we can be “Jesus certain” of the eternal life that awaits us. Let this assurance inspire us to live purposefully daily and commit to our salvation journey.
[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]
I know that some people will try to say that God is physical somehow. This is because Moses said “Our God is a fire that destroys.” And in John’s gospel, “God is spirit, so the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” According to those people, these are clear proofs that God has a body. Fire and spirit are tangible things, and those passages say that God is those things. But I have to ask those people: what do you do with the verse that says “God is light”? The same John also wrote “God is light, and there is no darkness in him at all.” It’s true! God is the light that gives us an understanding of truth, at least to people who are capable of taking it in. One of the Psalms says, “Your light lets us see light.” Is there any other kind of light that can bring enlightenment? Only God’s influence can give us an understanding of what is true. His influence is what leads us to him, because he is truth itself. That’s what the expression “your light allows us to see light” means — his light is Jesus, who makes it possible for us to see the father. Just because God is called “light” doesn’t mean that it’s like the light of the sun. It would be absurd for anyone to think that sunlight gives them access to the primal source of knowledge. It would be absurd to think that sunlight could lead someone to understand truth.
Some profound events are captured in a relatively short amount of space in the Bible. The narrative of Jesus’ birth really takes up only seven verses in Matthew (1:18-25) and seven verses in Luke (2:1-7). The resurrection is not described at all, but mention of it is confined to a few verses in each of the four gospels. Even the establishment of the church, from the apostles being filled with the Spirit to the sermon, the response, and the events immediately thereafter in all of 47 verses.
Contrast that with some of the longest chapters in the Bible. There are at least two different ways to tally this distinction (number of verses and number of words). In number of words per chapter in descending order, the list is Psalm 119, 1 Kings 8, Deuteronomy 28, Numbers 7, Leviticus 13, Jeremiah 51, Ezekiel 16, Genesis 24, 1 Samuel 17, and Leviticus 14. In number of verses per chapter in descending order, the list is Psalm 119, Numbers 7, 1 Chronicles 6, Luke 1, Matthew 26, Nehemiah 7, Mark 14, Psalm 78, John 6, and Luke 22.
We understand that modern chapter divisions were made by Stephen Langston early in the 13th Century, and the Ben Asher family divided the Hebrew Bible into verses around 900 AD and the modern division into verses was made by Robert Estienne in the 16th Century. Originally, Bible books were not divided into chapters and verses. That was added to aid in readability. Yet, it is the informed opinion of individuals with an excellent grasp of content and comprehension that the content in those chapters are of a fairly uniformed topic.
There are some lessons to be learned from those long chapters, if we struggle with wondering why God devoted so much attention and information to matters that we find baffling. Let’s consider five lessons from the five longest chapters.
Lesson: GOD’S WORD IS VALUABLE, BENEFICIAL, AND MATCHLESSLY IMPORTANT (Psalm 119). In 22 stanzas (the same number of letters in the Hebrew alphabet), David tells us “from A to Z” why there’s no book like the Bible! The length and excess of the chapter, with its 176 verses, highlights this beautiful fact. How do I view God’s Word?
Lesson: WORSHIP IS IMPORTANT TO GOD (1 Kings 8). In 66 verses and over 2100 words, we have the dedication of the temple by Solomon. From Solomon’s prayer to the prolific amount of sacrifices, the grandeur and glory of God is on full display and in full view. How do I view the privilege of worship?
Lesson: OBEDIENCE AND DISOBEDIENCE HAVE CONSEQUENCES (Deuteronomy 28). In Deuteronomy 11:29, Moses identifies Mount Gerizim as the mount of blessing and Mount Ebal as the mount of cursing. Deuteronomy 28, continuing the ritual recorded in the previous chapter, is a list of blessings and curses depending on what people do with God’s Word. The sheer repetition of especially the curses reminds us that God’s Word cannot be trifled with. We forget or rebel against God, and it will cost us!
Lesson: LEADERS SET THE TONE IN GIVING AND SACRIFICE (Numbers 7). While the giving and sacrifice in this chapter is literal and material, we glean such an important principle even under the New Testament covenant. Elders, deacons, teachers, and preachers who call for others to be generous and sacrificial in time, talent, and treasure must go first and show the way! Leaders do not offer the Lord that which costs them nothing (2 Sam. 24:24).
Lesson: PURITY IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO GOD (Leviticus 13). Moses gives an exhaustive set of tests to determine the presence of leprosy, giving a myriad of scenarios. But, as he refers to infectiousness, keeping uncleanness in check was indispensable. Often, leprosy symbolizes sin-sickness and the parallels abound. Leprosy required the involvement of a priest and so does sin. Leprosy comes from within, and so does sin. Leprosy affects the flesh, and so does sin. Leprosy is called uncleanness, and so is sin.
Sometimes we wonder why so much space is devoted to matters that we might find obscure or redundant. The deeper we dig and the more often we study, the greater our appreciation is for the truth Paul proclaims in 2 Timothy 3:16-17. It builds our confidence in the divine source of Scripture and the vast benefits we derive from studying and incorporating it into our lives.
There was a chaotic, inky, and endless cosmic ocean raging in the great nothingness before time began. But, if we could traverse back in time and glimpse the earth after it had just started spinning we’d likely surmise that we had stepped onto another planet. Animals spoke in a tongue which the first humans understood, bipedal serpents stalked the infant earth, and a mighty conflict exploded in the heavens among the sons of God. The thundering footsteps of giants could be heard roaming the ancient landscape; turning the blood of our ancestors to ice. Sorcery and witchcraft, though banned by our Creator, was successfully practiced and the consequences of those actions are not understood. From the garden of God to the hellscape of godless cities came accounts of good and evil. These accounts left a permanent impact on every generation that followed and the stories that have been passed down feel almost familiar somehow. It’s as if they were tattooed on our hearts or that eternity was ingrained in the human psyche.
A plethora of ancient cultures echo the same biblical imagery in their written and oral traditions. Mainstream astronomers, geologists, archeologists, and the secular slew of mighty minds have fooled themselves and others into believing that they’ve made discoveries that have enlightened the modern age. Our ancestors, as they’re painted in the history books, stumbled about in blind ignorance— longing to have access to the vast amounts of wisdom we’re privy to. This is simply not the case. The Bible serves as mankind’s one and only peek behind the spiritual veil. It’s a book that was attacked during its formation and ever since the completion of its closing revelation. Of all the accusations and allegations levied against the inspired texts, only the ignorant could make the claim that the Bible is boring. There’s a wide range of baggage one might bring with them as they crack open its precious pages but who could close the book and walk away with such a thought? It’s fascinating. It’s a gripping literary masterpiece with such historical, scientific, and spiritual implications that it’s powerful enough to upend the lives of its readers and reroute their eternal destination. The Bible is a book of life. It’s about life back then and right now. It’s about spiritual life; the bleak state of it then and our justified life now. It’s about the Creator of life. It elucidates, improves, elevates, and transforms. So, the Book is quite literally everything for everyone.
The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever (Psalm 119:160).
Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him (Proverbs 30:5).
The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever (Isaiah 40:8).
Einstein unable to tie his shoelaces? That’s a rumor that’s been floating around for a while. One explanation was that he pretended to not know how to tie his shoes because he found it a waste of his time and he didn’t want it to occupy his mind. While you won’t find any written notes by Einstein claiming that he dressed himself, there’s plenty of photos of him with tied shoes. While the stereotype is largely unfounded, someone extremely intelligent — as Einstein was — is almost expected to have a very narrow focus for that intelligence. Maybe some expect him (and brilliant people in general) to lack common sense in the pedestrian sphere. The fact is we can safely assume that he was incredibly smart but didn’t know everything on account of his humanity.
Solomon was the wisest fool in the Bible. It’s nearly unimaginable that someone imbued with a Divine dose of brilliance would make seemingly senseless blunders, especially the sexual sins mimicking those committed by his father, David. Notice the fact recorded in First Kings:
“God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding beyond measure, and breadth of mind like the sand on the seashore…” (1 Kings 4.29ff).
Contrast that with chapter 11 which says,
“Now King Solomon loved many foreign women, along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, from the nations concerning which the LORD had said to the people of Israel, ‘You shall not enter into marriage with them, neither shall they with you, for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods.’ Solomon clung to these in love” (I Kings 11.1ff).
His wisdom wasn’t merely a kind of sage advice. It was clearly an intellect that was on another level. It was greater than, at the very least, anybody on earth in his day. Notice the extent the author of 1 Kings goes to in order to make this very point:
“He spoke of trees, from the cedar that is in Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of the wall. He spoke also of beasts, and of birds, and of reptiles, and of fish. And people of all nations came to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and from all the kings of the earth, who had heard of his wisdom” (1 Kings 4.33-34).
Even with all of that wisdom he failed to digest and apply the most important information he knew to be true. He knew what was true, but failed to act accordingly. As unbelievable as that is, the author of this article and every reader has done the same thing. Intentionally doing what we know to be wrong is the ugly part of our humanity. Thankfully, God, in all of His wisdom, gives us the ability to succeed and overcome it (2 Peter 1.3).
“There’s a great day coming.” Zephaniah did not know this song, yet he sung it anyway. Why? Let’s notice the first chapter of his short prophecy.
Judgement (1:1-18)
Neal Pollard
Zephaniah’s prophesy begins immediately with the future pronouncements of judgment. He begins with a judgment on the world (2-3), then narrows down to Judah. An overview of his message is that judgment is coming and it will be severe for the unprepared (1-6). No one will be exempt from this judgment (7-13). There will be no bargaining or escaping our sentence (14-18).
How do we know that Zephaniah’s first audience is the whole world? Notice how he starts from the broadest category–“all things”–and works to the more specific. It is almost like the reverse of creation, suggesting that God will undo everything He did at creation. The idea is of total judgment on all. God had done this before, during Noah’s life. Judah would also have remembrance of this, and these warnings should make them know that they are not exempt from His judgment.
God would bring judgment on Judah and Jerusalem, too. The judgment language is clearly evident. Notice the phrases “stretch out My hand against” (4), “cut off” (4), and “the day of the Lord.” The day of the Lord as a day of judgment is mentioned 15 times from Zephaniah 1:7-2:3. The day is described as a day of the Lord’s wrath (15,18) and later as the day of His anger (2:2-3). Why had Judah drawn such a response from God? The sins include idolatry (5), hypocrisy (5), apostasy (8), compromise (8), superstition (9), indifference (12), and greed (13). To make things worse, they felt no shame over such things (2:1).
Zephaniah pleads with any who had goodness within them to seek God and be humble, obedient, and righteous (2:3). Judgment could not be avoided, but maybe “you will be hidden in the day of the Lord’s anger” (2:3). By the way, that is the meaning of Zephaniah’s name (whom God hides).
Who would experience this judgment? “All” (4), “the men” (12), and, later, the leadership (3:1-4). The guests he has set apart and consecrated for His sacrifice (7-8) are not set apart for service but for punishment. They include the princes, the king’s sons (9), people in all parts of Jerusalem (10), and “the men who are stagnant in spirit” (12).
This would be a day of distress (17) and devouring (18). God wants Judah to appreciate that His wrath is justified, the result of man’s sinfulness. Josiah had tried to make some reforms, but he did so following decades and decades of wickedness growing more and more depraved. Revisit Manasseh’s reign (2 Chron. 33:1-9). It has been said that they worked overtime to do sin and now were going to be paid with divine punishment. Zephaniah doesn’t tell us who God will use to punish them. That job would go to prophets like Jeremiah and Habakkuk. Zephaniah’s task is to let them know that their sin had resulted in God’s justified wrath. God would not let their willful, impenitent sin go unaddressed.
As always, we should not think that God had a short fuse and a quick trigger. He had been forbearing and patient with His people. Generation after generation, they had forgotten Him, replaced Him, and rebelled against His will. They wanted the blessings of God, but they could not be burdened with His rules. God sent prophets to warn them and try to correct their path. He had given them the law and priests to remind them of God’s revealed will. But even many of those tasked with prophetic and priestly duties forsook them and merely told the people what they wanted to hear. God’s long-suffering kindness had reached its limit. Their heritage and claim as His children would not, by itself, save them from judgment. Of all people, they knew better. But they did not do better. God would settle the matter with judgment.
So much is said and taken for granted without benefit of further study. That’s true of history, but even more true of the Bible.
Neal Pollard
The very title might offend some people, but it is the truth. Of course, context helps. It was Edwin Booth, not John Wilkes. And it was Robert, not Abraham, Lincoln. Edwin and Robert were among customers buying passage on a sleeping car in Jersey City, New Jersey. Lincoln lost his balance and fell into an open space between the train and the station platform. By all accounts, he would have been crushed and likely killed if Edwin had not “vigorously seized” and “quickly pulled up and out” onto the platform (Letters of Note: Volume 1: An Eclectic Collection of Correspondence Deserving of a Wider Audience. Chronicle Books. 2014. p. 282).
Context can be very helpful. Without it, we can draw some erroneous and even fatal conclusions. This is especially true with the Bible, a book many may know a little about but neglect to study with depth and purpose. Doctrines and conclusions are based on statements taken out of context.
“Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved…” (Acts 16:31).
“The Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart…” (Ex. 9:12; 10:20; 14:8; etc.).
“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated…” (Mal. 1:2; Rom. 9:13).
“Whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved…” (Joel 2:32; Acts 2:21; Rom. 10:13).
“Where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst” (Mat. 18:20).
Sometimes, the content of a verse is explained and understood better just by reading the verses before and after it. That is the case is Acts 16:31 and Matthew 18:20. In Acts, the jailor is taught about Jesus and faith includes repentance and baptism (Acts 16:32-34). In Matthew, the subject is not worship but church discipline (18:15ff).
Sometimes, a statement needs to be understood in light of the broader context. That would be the case regarding Pharaoh and Esau. The Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart through the plagues, causing the Egyptian king to rebel against God’s will and choose pride over penitence. In the case of Esau, as Paul explains, the idea is of God’s sovereign choice. God was not unjust. He had a purpose for choosing Jacob over Esau (Rom. 9:11).
Sometimes, a statement causes us to look deeper into all the Bible says about the subject. Consider the idea of calling on the name of the Lord to be saved. Rather than salvation by confession, the Bible teaches what is involved in calling on the name of the Lord. Ananias taught Saul that this is done when one is baptized, washing away sins (Acts 22:16).
When we are studying the Bible, we must always do so contextually. Whether that is the immediate context (the verses around a statement) or the broader context (everything the Bible says about it or further light shed on it elsewhere), it makes the difference in the conclusions we draw. God expects us to “handle accurately the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15)! May we be the best Bible students we can be.
What do you think of when you read or hear of “walking in the truth”? Is it more than worshipping according to the New Testament pattern and baptizing for the remission of sins? What does the epistle of 2 John teach us about this important character trait?
Gary Pollard
II John 3 talks about living in truth and love. John was happy that they were following the truth, but they apparently weren’t following the way of love. We’ve looked at how John defines this love in I John 3, but as a quick refresher: “This is how we know what real love is — Jesus gave his life for us. So we should give our lives for each other. Suppose a believer who is rich enough to have all the necessities of life sees a fellow believer who is poor and does not even have basic needs. What if the rich believer doesn’t help the poor one? Then it is clear that God’s love is not in that person’s heart” (16-17). He uses almost exactly the same formula in II John, which reads like I John if it were condensed to one chapter.
In II John 6 he says, “Loving means living the way he commanded us to live. God’s command is this: that you live a life of love. You heard this command from the beginning.” We won’t have “grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and his Son” if we aren’t living in both truth and love (3). This lady and her family had the truth thing down, but their love needed some work. John seems to go back and forth between the truth and love theme in this letter.
There’s a warning sandwiched between two “truth” statements. “Be careful! Don’t lose the reward we have worked for. Be careful so that you will receive all of that reward” (8). Be careful about what? “There are many false teachers in the world now,” and, “Everyone must continue to follow only the teaching about Christ. Whoever changes that teaching does not have God” (7 and 9). The teaching about Christ is that he came to Earth and became human (cf. 7).
We may take this for granted and/or may not appreciate its significance. Many gods competed for the hearts of nations, and most of world had a pantheon. Paul said that these gods are actually just demons (I Cor 10.19-20; cf. Deut 32.17, I Enoch 19.1), and there is compelling evidence of certain of these taking different names throughout history. The Egyptian god Thoth was worshipped by the Greeks as Hermes and the Romans as Mercury. Amun (Egypt) was Zeus (Greece) and Jupiter (Rome). Isis (Egypt) was Aphrodite (Greece) and Venus (Rome). Ra (Egypt) was Zeus (Greece), Jupiter (Rome), and Indra (Hindu). Hathor (Egypt) was a fixation for some time over the last couple of centuries, and has also been associated with Aphrodite (Greece) and Venus (Rome).1 This list is far from exhaustive. They’re all just archetypes used by demons to manipulate and derail civilizations.
No god took human form23 and lived a very public life doing good for others in the most selfless possible way. No god was perfectly innocent. But God made himself human, was morally perfect, and sacrificed his physical body before coming back to life. That last action was a promise — we’ll get that too! God becoming human for our sake is the most beautiful narrative ever conceived. God becoming human revealed the Great Mystery to all of humanity for the first time (Eph 3.4-6, Col 4.3): there is a greater power, he wants a relationship with humanity, and he’s coming back to save his family when earth is destroyed.
With this truth in our hearts, God expects us to capitalize on any opportunities we have to show selfless love to our Christian family, and then to all people we encounter.
Don’t save treasures for yourselves here on earth. Moths and rust will destroy them and thieves can break in and steal them. Instead, save your treasures in the heavens, where they cannot be destroyed by moths or rust and where thieves cannot break in and steal them. Your heart will be where your treasure is (Mt 6.19-21).
1 Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (2017, October 27). 11 Egyptian Gods and Goddesses. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/list/11-egyptian-gods-and-goddesses 2At the very least it’s curious that many polytheistic cultures believed in an incorporeal afterlife. A physical God and a physical resurrection repulsed the Gnostics, who were certainly influenced by Egyptian theology. The Egyptians believed in a non-physical afterlife, as did many or most other religions (sadly, many Christians do, too). While it may or may not be accurate, Enoch claims that demons are the spirits (consciousness) of human/watcher offspring who’ve been relieved of their bodies (15.8-9). If that’s true, it’s at least interesting that most of the cultures they influenced also despised the concept of a physical afterlife. Our God came back to life in a real, physical body and promised us the same. It’s real hope. Their gods are smoke and mirrors and offer no tangible, practical hope. 3I’m not talking about humans whose actions ultimately led their deification, but primordial “gods” considered superior to humanity by the cultures who worship them.
Have you heard of Milo of Croton? Perhaps you are carrying some heavy burdens that would take a strength greater than his to bear? Is there help?
Dale Pollard
Milo of Croton was a six-time Olympic wrestling champion and legendary athlete from the 6th century BC Greek city of Croton. He’s a well known figure in ancient history for many impressive feats including winning the boys’ wrestling competition in 540 BC and then the men’s wrestling competition for four years in a row (62nd through 66th Olympiads). However, Milo is probably best known not for his wrestling career but for his strength training methods. This supposedly involved carrying a young calf over his shoulder every day until it progressively grew larger and larger until eventually the calf became a fully matured ox. Afterwards he allegedly even carried the ox through the stadium at Olympia.
It’s unknown exactly how heavy the confused ox on Milo’s shoulder was but today they can weigh between 1,500 and 3,000 pounds. Oxen are larger and heavier than cows, are intentionally bred to be the strongest and largest animals capable of doing work. It typically takes about two years from birth to maturity which doesn’t seem like a long time— unless you’ve been picking it up every day.
Hebrews 12:10 encourages the Christian by reminding us that the temporal discipline we receive from God is for our eternal benefit. Taking up the name of Christ and lifting up our cross on a daily basis may seem daunting but it’s only for a season. The process itself increases our endurance and firms up our faith and the most encouraging part of all is that we aren’t expected to make the lifts alone.
“You shall not see your brother’s donkey or his ox fallen down by the way and ignore them. You shall help him to lift them up again”
(Deut. 22.4).
“I was pushed hard, so that I was falling, but the LORD helped me” (Ps. 118.13).
Did God actually send hornets against the Canaanites? What do you think is meant by God sending a hornet before Israel?
Dale Pollard
God not only told the Israelites that He would give them the land of Canaan, He also told them how He would do so. Moses records the very words of God as He explains what the initial steps of the conquest was going to look like and it’s as fascinating as it is strange.
Angelic (Conditional) Assistance
“Behold I send an angel before you to guard you on the way and to bring you to the place I have prepared. Pay close attention to him and obey his voice; do not rebel against him, for he will not pardon your transgressions, for my name is in him” (Ex. 23:20-21).
We’re told that the angel would “go before them” and bring them to pagan armies and peoples such as the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, and of course, the Canaanites— to name a few. (V.23).
The Terror & The Hornet
After this the reader is thrown a curve ball as two additional names are introduced.
“I will send my terror before you and will throw into confusion all the people against whom you shall come…” (v.27).
“…I will send hornets before you, which shall drive out the Hivites, Cannanites, and the Hittites before you” (v.28).
The angel, terror, and hornet are each different Hebrew words but share a commonality— they go before the Israelites.
It sounds like these terms could describe three separate beings or forerunners that were meant to accomplish separate tasks. It’s an interesting idea so that’s reason enough to dive in and investigate. Hopefully by the time we come up for air it’ll make more sense.
Hornets In The Bible
First, let’s deal with “the hornets.” Only three other times in the Old Testament do we find passages with hornets. Exodus 23:28 is the first time it’s used and here Moses is quoting what God told him that He would do.
The next occurrence is in Deuteronomy 7:20 where Moses reminds the Israelites just before they storm the Promise Land about those hornets God said he would send ahead of them.
Finally, the last mention is the most elucidating. In Joshua 24:12 there’s a subtle hint found in most English translations. It says, “And I sent the hornet before you, which drove them out before you…”. All three passages about hornets refer to the conquest event. More importantly, Joshua seems to recall a single hornet rather than multiple hornets.
Make It Make Sense
Joshua is the only passage in most translations that describes a singular hornet but the other two passages actually use the same Hebrew word. Meaning, the translators chose to make the hornets plural in two passages but chose to make it singular in Joshua’s account.
Well, now it’s time to revisit Exodus. Here the angel is mentioned in the singular and then what the angel does to the Lord’s enemies. The angel will bring the Lord’s “terror” on the pagan people which will “throw them into confusion.” The terrified and confused people will “turn their backs” and run from the Israelites. Like a hornet, the angel will literally put the fear of God in them and chase them. Anybody who’s been chased by a hornet will know that fear and madness all too well.
The guardian angel of the Israelites is mentioned several more times throughout the Old Testament but this particular event showcases the role that their angel played in the conquest of Canaan. It’s probably not talking about literal hornets or even just one nasty hornet that buzzed into battle. You could even argue that Exodus 33:2 further attests to this. It states, “I will send an angel before you and I will drive out the Cannanites, the Amorites, the Hittites…” God explains how He’s going to assist them and then what His assistant is going to do. God’s angel is going to run off the bad guys like an angry hornet.
Could God accomplish His will with just one little hornet? I think every believer knows the answer to that— absolutely.
What keeps us from realizing the true reality of our spiritual debt to God? Are we ever like Simon the leper?
Neal and Kathy Pollard
Neal Pollard
Why did Jesus speak in parables? The disciples wondered just that (Matthew 13:10). The Holy Spirit records four answers. First, Jesus used parables because not all would receive the mysteries of the Kingdom by direct revelation (13:11). Further, He did so because many hearts were dull and eyes and ears were closed (13:13-16). Those with faith would accept His teaching, but unbelievers would not understand. Then, He used parables because the prophets foretold that He would (13:34, 35). Finally, He did because there were things hidden from the foundation of the world that He must reveal (13:35).
What relevance, then, do the parables have for the modern Bible reader? Now, the parables exist as part of that written revelation. Through them, one can see prophecy fulfilled. The mystery that has been kept secret for long ages past (cf. Romans 16:25) can now be known. Thus, the parables are of paramount importance as practical instruction today.
Jesus’ parables come out of many settings. He spoke them during private talks with the disciples, in public sermons, and on the occasion of miracles and healings, but maybe the most effective parables were borne out of situations where His enemies tested him. The parable in Luke 7:41-42 is such a one. Consider four key words that aid one to better understand the so-called “Parable of Two Debtors.”
Content
The actual parable is two verses in length, as man has divided scripture. Jesus expended a total of thirty Greek words (43—NIV; 40—KJV; 34—NAS). The parable is filled with simple images that are easily comprehended. He presents the characters, a moneylender and two debtors. He presents the situation, that one owes about 500 days wages while another owes 50. He presents the predicament, namely that neither had the ability to repay their debt. He presents the lender’s response, who graciously forgives both of them. He presents the debtors’ reactions, which is left for the hearers to interpret but is easily discerned.
Two men in debt needed help beyond their ability to resolve. The lender is also the forgiver. Jesus uses financial problems to illustrate spiritual problems. How appropriate, since most people, regardless of time or geography, have suffered financial reverses. One national survey found that seventy percent of all worries involve money (Collins, Christian Counseling, 531). Suppose a person owed a single creditor $100,000 and the creditor called in the entire debt at once. The debtor is unable to pay, and the creditor sends back news that the entire debt is totally expunged from the record. How would that person feel toward the creditor, compared, say, with one who owed $1000 but whose debt was also forgiven. The parable teaches the principle of greater debt, greater appreciation, and lesser debt, lesser appreciation.
Context
The setting of the parable gives it its meaning. Jesus uses the parable to illustrate two very different people before His eyes. Consider them.
The first person is a Pharisee named Simon. One scholar points out that:
The Pharisees were the largest sect of the Jews. They grew out of an older party, the Chasidim, the Pious ones, and became the “Separatists” of ancient times. They took the name “Pharisee” probably during the rule of John Hyrcanus, BC 135-110. They favored a narrow religio-political policy, in distinction to the Sadducees who wished to see the Jews a nation among the Nations (Robertson, na).
If the Jews labeled themselves “conservatives” and “liberals,” it could be commonly agreed that the Pharisees were the former and the Sadducees the latter. While Jesus had no quarrel with their strict interpretation of the Law (cf. Matthew 23:3), He often rebuked their heart and attitude (Matthew 23:3-5). Simon the Pharisee apparently had no glaring, outward sin problems, but was guilty in Luke seven of some severe heart problems.
The second person is a woman of the city and a known sinner. Some have theorized that she was a prostitute, but nonetheless not likely to have been on Simon’s “A” List. She brings an alabaster vial of perfume, a long neck bottle Jewish women wore as an accessory around the neck and broken when festive occasions called for its use. Simon had invited Jesus for a meal, but she had “crashed” the party. It took a lot of courage for her to come where she was obviously not welcome.
When Jews ate their meals at dinner parties, they would have reclined on low couches. They leaned on their left arm with the head toward the table and the body stretched out away from it. They removed their sandals before taking this position. This is the way the woman would have found Jesus. Her emotions seemingly overcome her and her tears fall on His feet. She wiped His feet with her hair, which means she would have had to unbind her hair. This was a social taboo for Jewish women. By this point, one sees that she cared more about honoring Jesus than pleasing the crowd. She performs a slave’s task, tending to His feet.
After the parable, Jesus asks a remarkable question: “Do you see this woman?” Obviously, Simon knew she was there, but he did not see her properly. G. Campbell Morgan writes, “Simon could not see the woman as she then was, for looking at her as she had been.” There are a lot of Simons in the world who refuse to let those who become Christians forget what they once were (cf. 1 Pet. 4:4). Yet, the worst Simons can be in the church, refusing to let penitent, forgiven brothers and sisters forget their past.
The story ends with Jesus informing Simon that He had forgiven the woman’s sins. In Matthew 9:3, when He forgave the paralytic’s sins, the scribes thought Jesus a blasphemer. Yet, He does not gloss over the woman’s apparent immorality. He calls them her “many sins” (Luke 7:47). In this, He rebukes Simon for “loving little” and implies that He stood unforgiven.
Contrast
One owed much and one owed less.Both of them, however, are sinners and are in a greater debt than they can repay. Such has always been the case, as it is today (cf. Ecclesiastes 7:10; Romans 3:10,23; 1 John 5:19). Yet, the difference between the two debts is obvious.
One was forgiven much and one was forgiven less. The word “forgave” (Luke 7:42) is different from “forgiven” in verse forty-eight. “Forgave” (7:42) is from the same word family as the word translated “grace” throughout the New Testament. The word “forgiven” means “let go” or “release,” and when used in legal terms meant to be freed from an office, marriage, debt or obligation. The forgiveness Jesus offered was an act rather than a nebulous concept. It was a conditional gift she could enjoy eternally. She sought forgiveness, while Simon did not. She received it, but he did not.
One was humble and one was proud. Jesus praises the sinner and condemns the religious leader. Why? In a word, “Attitude.” The parable in Luke eighteen illustrates this well, verse fourteen pronouncing the sinful tax collector justified and the pompous Pharisee not justified. Jesus saw great potential in a “Big S” sinner who knew it than in a “little s” sinner who did not.
One loved much and one loved little. Jesus implies this in the parable and makes Simon explicitly admit it. The natural response of every forgiven person should be “much love” (cf. 1 John 4:19).
Conclusions
Consider some practical lessons one can glean from that parable for today.
No one is worthy of forgiveness.Both debtors in the parable did nothing to merit forgiveness. No one today is worthy (cf. Titus 3:5). To understand God’s grace, one must see himself as a sinner in need of it.
Not all sinners grasp the seriousness of their sinfulness. Simon was no less a sinner, but he acted like he was. Likewise, some of the hardest people to win to Christ are good, moral, but unsaved people (cf. Matthew 7:21-23).
No one can repay his debt.Not just the two fictional characters in the parable. Not just Simon and the woman. Everybody needs Jesus (Micah 6:7).
Sins of attitude are as deadly as sins of action. Ask the elder brother in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15). Among the lusts of the flesh, wherein is listed murder, adultery, and fornication, one also finds outbursts of anger, disputes, and envy. Sins of attitude will keep one out of heaven as surely as will sins of action (cf. Romans 6:23).
Jesus freely forgives those who seek it.That is the good news and bottom line of this parable. Jesus’ forgiveness is available to everyone (Titus 2:11; 1 Timothy 2:6). Yet, one must seek it like the sinful woman did!
Have you ever found yourself in over your head, when you had to ask for help? We never like to get to that point, financially, emotionally, physically, or spiritually. But, unless we callous our hearts to the truth, we need God constantly–especially spiritually. In Psalm 38, David comes before the Lord pleading with Him to help in a dire situation. While it involves the opposition of earthly enemies (12,19), the main concern is his own opposition to God’s will. The main problem on David’s mind is his sin problem. David gives us an example of how to pray to God in time of trouble, especially the self-induced kind.
ACKNOWLEDGE HOW YOUR SIN MAKES HIM FEEL (1-3)
David knows that God hates sin and is displeased by its presence in our lives. Meaningful repentance and change is not possible until we can see our sin through His perfect eyes. This honest assessment will keep us from being defensive or from rationalizing.
SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE SERIOUSNESS OF YOUR SIN (4-8)
Look at all the descriptive terms and synonyms David uses regarding his sin. His “iniquities” are heavy burdens, foul and festering wounds, that which causes him to be bent over and bowed down, the cause of constant mourning, a debilitating sickness, and a numbing, crushing, agitating thing. See your sin that way and there is no way to hang onto it, much less embrace and defend it.
CONFESS YOUR INABILITY TO RESOLVE THIS ALONE (9-14)
Pride is such a destructive thing! David shows no sign of it in this psalm. He feels isolated from friends and tormented by foes. He feels incapable of solving this problem himself. Resolution must be preceded by recognition of how daunting our circumstance is without God.
TELL GOD OF YOUR HOPE THAT HE WILL HELP YOU (15-22)
The state of mind David has expressed inevitably leads to divine dependency. He hopes in God. He’s confident that God will answer him. Though he knows he’s close to falling, he pleads with God to intercede. His final plea as he speaks to God? “Make haste to help me, O Lord, my salvation.”
We must resist the devil and our own fleshly desires. God has equipped us with the ability to be disciplined and to deny self. But, the battle cannot be won without leaning on the Everlasting Arms. Don’t just know that. Express it to God daily, throughout the day. It will help you see your problems more clearly and to see God as the solution.
In 2 Corinthians 10:4-5, Paul reminds his readers that, though we live in the world, we don’t fight the same way the world fights; instead, he says, “For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God…”
In that spirit, I want to share an argument that I’ve come across somewhat recently that argues against God, and how to counter it.
The argument goes as follows: First, God knows all things; therefore, He knows what He can say or do that would convince any particular person to believe in Him. Second, God can do all things; therefore, He is able to do whatever would convince any particular person to believe in Him no matter how hard it may seem by human standards. Finally, God has stated in the Bible that He wants “all men to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim. 2:4). However, not everyone believes in God; therefore, He either doesn’t know what can convince someone, can’t do what would convince someone, or is lying about His desire for everyone to come to the knowledge of the truth.
At first, it can seem like a strong argument, but there are cracks in its façade. First, it’s true that God does know all things. In fact, He knows more about people than they know about themselves. Richard Dawkins used to say that he would only be convinced that God was real if he ever heard that trumpet call and saw Jesus coming down from heaven with the angels and the resurrected saints on the Day of Judgment. Nowadays, he says that even if he saw that, he would assume he was hallucinating. I saw another prominent atheist, when asked if there were any evidence that could convince him of God’s reality, ultimately responded that even if he were to see the stars in the sky move and arrange themselves to spell out “Believe in me, John,” that he would more likely believe that aliens were messing with him. There are some people who will refuse to believe no matter what evidence is presented, and in those cases, God will allow people who don’t love the truth to exchange it for a lie (Romans 1:25).
Furthermore, God is interested in something far deeper than some mere mental assent. He doesn’t want people to simply believe that He exists or even believe that He is powerful or even good and just leave it at that. Adam and Eve believed that God exists and must have been convinced of His power (He had made the world) and even His goodness (He had given them everything), but did that stop them from sinning? Cain talked with God, but still murdered his brother. The Israelites at the foot of Mount Sinai were convinced of God’s existence and power, but they still made a golden calf to stand in for the Lord of heaven and earth (and that against His express command). Even the demons believe in God as James tells us, but God wants more than our acknowledgment. He wants our love and He wants our faith. And He deserves it, too!
Because the second point is that God can do all things, and He has done the unimaginable just to prove how much He really loves us. He became flesh and blood. The infinite God wrapped up in a finite, mortal shell. I can’t understand any better than I could understand turning myself into an ant. And then to sacrifice Himself to save us from our own sins!
The people who demand that God prove His existence to them in some miraculous way are arrogant. It reminds me of the Pharisees who, after Jesus had done numerous miracles, still asked for a sign. God wants everyone to come to the knowledge of the truth, and He has done everything necessary to show that. The ball is now, so to speak, in your court.
Walvoord and Zuck observe, “This is perhaps the best-known section in the Book of Isaiah. Several parts of this passage are quoted in the New Testament: Isaiah 52:15 in Romans 15:21; Isaiah 53:1 in John 12:38 and Romans 10:16; Isaiah 53:4 in Matthew 8:17; Isaiah 53:7–8 in Acts 8:32–33; Isaiah 53:9 in 1 Peter 2:22; and Isaiah 53:12 in Luke 22:37” (BKC, 1106). This chapter is the most recognizably Messianic of the entire book of Isaiah. It is the completion of the fourth Servant Poem, in which the prophet reveals three crucial facts about Him.
The suffering servant would be overlooked (1-2). Why? Given the prelude of this Servant (52:13-15), this is a surprising fact. This exalted and glorified One is described now as a tender shoot, a root out of dry ground, with no stately form or majesty, and without an attractive appearance. The message about Him and from Him is deemed unbelievable (1). He grows up among the people, who cannot but see Him only as a carpenter, Mary’s son, with younger brothers and sisters, and, thus, a cause of offense (Mark 6:3). He is “this man” (Luke 7:39). The root out of dry ground takes our minds back to Isaiah 11:1, the tender shoot of Jesse. Physically unremarkable, financially modest, and without any sort of commending pedigree, He was an average, ordinary-looking Man among men.
The suffering servant would be oppressed (3-10a). Beyond His humble circumstances, His contemptible appearance, combined with His relentless effort to spread His unconventional message backed by undeniable miracles, led to His opponents doing all within their power to punish and silence Him. Graphically, Isaiah foretells what those among whom He dwelled dispatched of Him (or so they thought). His oppression was vicious. It led Him to experience despising, forsaking, grieving, sorrowing, and condescending (3,7). His oppression was vicarious. It led Him to experience things for us, things we deserved to experience but that He went through on our behalf (4-6,8). James Smith gives us a concise chart of this:
OUR EXPERIENCE
HIS EXPERIENCE
Griefs
Bore
Sorrows
Carried
Transgression
Pierced Through
Iniquities
Crushed
Peace
Chastening
Healed
Scourging
Smith, James E. The Major Prophets. Joplin, MO: College Press, 1992. Print. Old Testament Survey Series, 149.
His oppression was voluntary (7). Reading the fulfillment of this in the gospels as Jesus stands before Pilate and His many accusers, He chose not to speak to defend Himself. He knew that as a sacrificial Lamb, He had to submit to their torture and injustice. His oppression was violent, as we see from the many words associated with the death He would die (9). His oppression was victorious (9-10). It accomplished the Divine purpose, in which He played a part as God the Word. He successfully became the blood offering for our sins (10). But that last fact points us to the last major point of the chapter (10b-12).
The suffering servant would be an overcomer (10b-12). As this was the premeditated plan of heaven, the Godhead knew that death could not keep Him down and the grave could not hold Him (1 Cor. 15:54-57). That’s why the Lord was “pleased” to allow such cruelty to occur. After being made a guilt offering for our sins, “the Lord would prolong His days” (10). Notice how the vicarious nature of the suffering Servant’s sacrifice would satisfy divine justice and solve humanity’s spiritual debt problem.
The Preacher Pollard Blog 