In 2009, Gary, Dale, and I took a scenic route back from Neosho, Missouri, where I’d held a meeting, to Denver, Colorado. It took us through Greensburg, Kansas, site of one of the most destructive tornadoes in U.S. history. That was May 4, 2007. Just two years later, the nearest city to Neosho, Joplin, would experience one of the deadliest tornadoes in modern times. 160 people lost their lives. I have been to Moore, Oklahoma, several times. From 1998 to 2015, this Oklahoma City suburb experienced nine tornadoes, three of them large enough to take lives. One in 1999 claimed 46 lives, and another in 2013 claimed 24. Of course, we experienced a deadly, destructive tornado here in Bowling Green less than four years ago.
The Bible doesn’t use the word tornado (or hurricane). But, it does speak of violent windstorms (Zech. 7:14; Mark 4:37ff), tempests (Job 9:17; Psa. 55:8), whirlwinds (Hos. 8:7), thunderstorms (Exo. 9:18; Job 37:1ff), hailstorms (Psa. 148:8; Hag. 2:17), and similar natural events. Whether the ancients experienced an EF-5 or not, they saw the destructive force of nature often enough. Inevitably, inspired writers compared the trials and difficulties of life to storms. Think of some compelling parallels.
Both can come suddenly and unexpectedly.
Both can inflict damage that leave lasting consequences.
Both can evoke strong emotions like anxiety, fear, distress, and sorrow.
Both awake in us feelings of dependency and inadequacy.
Both should heighten our awareness of the God who rules wind, water, and world.
Both are no respecters of our status, education, income, age, etc.
Both are confronted better with adequate shelter and protection.
No doubt, this is an incomplete list. But, God’s wisdom included the inspired illustrations of physical storms to prepare us for the storms of life. Isaiah foresees a glorious future “like a refuge from the wind and a shelter from the storm, like streams of water in a dry country, like the shade of a huge rock in a parched land” (Isa. 32:2). In the face of a host of potential threats, the psalmist asserts, “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High Will abide in the shadow of the Almighty. I will say to the Lord, “My refuge and my fortress, My God, in whom I trust!” (Psalm 91:1-2).
Perhaps you are facing something that you’d liken to a tornado or tempest in your inmost being. This will continue as long as we’re in this body on this earth and this life. God does not promise us exemption from their presence, but He does promise us escape from their power. If you are in the midst of the storm, hold onto Him. He promises that you will survive and that ultimately you will triumph.
Sometimes, we read in the Old Testament about events, people, and things, wondering its significance. But, if we keep reading, we will often see why they are there. Brent discusses one of those today.
Brent Pollard
An intriguing aspect of the Day of Atonement—frequently neglected—is the significance of the scapegoat. In Leviticus 16.10, the English Standard Version designates the scapegoat as Azazel. In contemporary discourse, scapegoat refers to an individual unjustly laden with blame during strife or turmoil. Remarkably, that concept traces back to the holy observance established by the Lord for the Day of Atonement.
We often focus on the goat whose blood the priest sprinkles on the mercy seat (Leviticus 16.15). And rightly so—this initial offering represented reconciliation, a blessing we yearn for profoundly. A definition of atonement is “making amends by offering something of equal value for a wrong done.” To put it succinctly, because the result of wrongdoing is death (Romans 6.23), the goat’s demise satisfied God’s just wrath.
However, the second goat—the one designated for removal—holds an equally important significance. Once offering the initial goat, the High Priest placed his hands upon the head of the scapegoat, proclaiming the people’s transgressions before releasing it into the wilderness (Leviticus 16.21–22). I have a deep appreciation for the way the NASB1995 translates verse 22:
“The goat shall bear on itself all their iniquities to a solitary land; and he shall release the goat in the wilderness.”
This vivid image reminds me of Psalm 103:12, “As far as the east is from the west, so far has He removed our transgressions from us.” While this imagery may not resonate with flat-earthers, round-earthers understand that traveling east or west never ends—you never “arrive.” Similarly, the scapegoat symbolically carried the people’s sins to a distant place where they could never return.
The significance for Christians is deeply impactful. The Lord Jesus, the Lamb of God, offered His blood, establishing a lasting atonement for our transgressions (1 John 2.2; see Hebrews 9.12; 10.10). Yet He also embodied the scapegoat—removing our sins (see 1 John 3.5). Both were essential for our purpose. For reconciliation, death was necessary; therefore, Jesus took on the role of our Paschal Lamb. However, reconciliation with the Divine necessitated the removal of sin—and it is in this context, the symbolism of the scapegoat fulfills its purpose.
Ultimately, the scapegoat is extremely important to believers. It reminds us that Jesus paid the price for our sins and took them away altogether. Jesus bridges the gap between us and God by dying and absolving our sins. He is both the slain Lamb and the scapegoat who carried our sins away. Through this dual work, we experience forgiveness, freedom, and reconciliation—a gift we should never take for granted.
Gary continues to put the words of the Early Church Fathers in words we can understand. Those men lived near the time of the New Testament and apostles and give us insight into how Christians thought and believed in ancient times.
Gary Pollard
[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]
Now we should look at this issue from the standpoint of language — specifically the language used in the Message itself. It says that “God is a spirit” and we should now prove our beliefs on this statement. The relevant questions: When did Jesus say this? Who was he talking to? What was he talking about? The answers are easy to find. He was talking to the Samaritan woman. She thought that God could only be properly worshipped on Mt. Gerazim (this was what all Samaritans believed). This was her context when Jesus spoke those words. The Samaritan woman saw that Jesus was Jewish and asked him if she was supposed to worship in Jerusalem instead (which is what all Jews believed). Her exact words were, “All of our ancestors worshipped on this mountain, but you say that we’re only supposed to worship in Jerusalem.” The Samaritan woman believed that it was possible to worship God more or less correctly depending on location. As in, the Jews thought they were “more correct” by worshipping in Jerusalem and the Samaritans felt the same way about their worship on Gerazim. Because this was her understanding of worship, Jesus replied with, “Believe me, the time is coming when you won’t have to be in Jerusalem or on this mountain to worship. God is spirit, so the people who worship him have to do it in spirit and truth.” Look at how logical his answer was! He made the connection between “spirit” and “truth”: He called God a “spirit” to distinguish him from something confined to a body or form. He also called him “truth” to distinguish him from an inadequate shadow or pattern.
Who defines what a man is? Is he defined by physical, intellectual, emotional, and/or spiritual traits? What does the Bible have to say?
Dale Pollard
I wasn’t the only one who grew up playing a game the older kids called “man can.” It was a dangerous game that put your courage to the test and it wasn’t for the faint of heart either. Every participant would lay with their heads together in the form of a circle. Then one would take an aluminum can (occasionally filled with rocks or sand) and throw it into the air. Whoever the can hit in the face became the next lucky player who got to throw the can. This gave the victim an opportunity to get revenge if he had the skill and aim it took to do so.
There are many things men can’t do and not everything a man can do should be done. Thankfully the Bible has plenty of encouraging sections that lead men to consider what a man can and should do.
Have you ever made a list of why God is worthy to be praised? David did, in Psalm 111. Take a moment and explore his inspired, itemized list…
Neal Pollard
WORTHY OF PRAISE (PSALM 111)
Neal Pollard
One of those names that remind me of my childhood love of singing is Tillit S. Teddlie, a prolific songwriter and member of the church of Christ who lived to be 102. His songs have a trademark sound, and we have sung so many of them: “Heaven Holds All To Me,” “When We Meet In Sweet Communion,” “Oft We Come Together,” “Singing Redemption’s Song,” “Hear Me When I Call,” “Don’t Wait Too Long,” and “Into Our Hands.” He wrote about soul-winning and personal devotion, but he also devoted a lot of his hymns to worship. I love his song, “Worthy Art Thou.”
It is said that Teddlie wrote this hymn in 1930, sitting on his front porch on a Sunday morning. He was studying a commentary, Johnson’s Notes, looking for something to put into his sermon. His Bible was open to Revelation, where the elders are before the throne and singing, “Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing” (Rev. 5:11)(biographical info via hymnstudies.blog). Teddlie could as easily have been studying Psalm 111. While the phrase, “worthy of praise,” is not found in the psalm, the psalmist calls for praise and then sets out to show why.
HIS WORKS ARE WORTHY OF PRAISE
The psalm’s writer mentions God’s “work” and “works” four times in this brief psalm. They are “great” and “studied” by those who delight in Him (2). They are splendid and majestic (3). They are “powerful” (6). “The works of His hands are truth and justice” (7). The God who created everything did not step back and cease His activity among men after the creation. The God who calls for our works of obedience sets the example by continuing to work in the affairs of mankind. Whether His natural laws set in motion at the creation, His providential care, His answer to prayer, or His redemption, He is at work! For this, He deserves our praise.
HIS WONDERS ARE WORTHY OF PRAISE
“He has made His wonders to be remembered” (4). These are unusual things beyond human capabilities. It means “to be wonderful” or “to cause a wonderful thing to happen” (TWOT 723). While the psalmist doesn’t mention specifically what these wonders are or give examples, any of the attributes and actions would qualify. The psalmist mentions who He is and what He has done. If we think deeply about those, we are left to dwell on how incredible and awesome our God is!
HIS WORD IS WORTHY OF PRAISE
The psalmist does not confine his praise to God’s nature and activity. There are His precepts (7), His commandments (10), and His covenant (5,9). God’s greatness is found in what He has revealed to us and what that revelation does for us in this life and for the life to come. My maker has seen to it we have the owner’s manual, to help us know how to best live. I am blessed by His truth (7,8).
HIS WISDOM IS WORTHY OF PRAISE
While I must obtain wisdom myself, it is truly a “wisdom from above” (Jas. 3:17). I get wisdom through the fear of the Lord (10). This good understanding, brought about by His Word (see above), helps me avoid the folly of the unbeliever and the heartache of the rebellious.
When I assemble with the saints to worship, I need to have a proper frame of mind. That occurs by intentional preparation beforehand. It helps me to meditate on who God is and what I am about to do in worship. This can help me focus and bring a better offering. There is no shortage of matters to consider. This psalm shows me just a few of the reasons why the object of my worship is praiseworthy!
God’s coming in judgment is certainly not a new theme in the prophets. Sin is certainly rampant, as Malachi points out in the first few disputes. There are more to come in chapter three (7,13), but the prophet injects hope as he shifts his focus to the coming of Messiah. He continues to appeal to the hearts of the people, to practice their religion fro the inside out.
The Messiah’s Messenger (1-5). The words of Malachi are quoted in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and applied to John the baptizer (Mat. 11:10; Mark 1:2; Luke 1:76). His mission would be to clear the way for Messiah and declare the day of His coming (1). It would be a great day, but He will be a refiner and purifier such that most would not ultimately delight in His appearance (2-5). How the gospels plainly reveal this! The people’s expectations concerning the Christ were misguided and inaccurate, but they could, if they tried, look back to this Scripture and see the nature of His coming and the one who came before Him.
Robbing God (6-12). In the midst of this, God makes a transition in message appealing to His unchanging character. It was their fathers who had changed and fallen away from Him. God calls them to return to Him and He would return to them (7). One base indicator of their apostasy was evidenced in their giving. They were robbing Him in tithes and offerings (8-9). Whether it was a matter of faithlessness, selfishness, or worldliness, they were not giving generously as they should. God promises blessings in return, both material (10) and spiritual (11-12) if they would trust His provision and contribute accordingly.
Distinguish The Righteous And The Wicked (13-17). Perhaps discouragement also impacted their giving. They were convinced that it was vain and profitless to serve God, and they said as much (13-14). God assures them that He will distinguish between those who do and do not serve Him. He sees with perfect sight, and will reward with perfect fairness.
Scripture shapes our understanding of the Father. Yet, we often fall into the habit of crafting our own version of God in our minds. Someone once said, “You can safely assume that you’ve created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people as you do.” We tend to justify our shortcomings or find excuses to dismiss our poor choices. This inclination is all too natural.
Take our son Rich, for example. Whenever he gets caught doing something he shouldn’t, he blames the dog. One time, I walked into the kitchen to find him covered in Nutella, his hand buried deep in the jar. His first instinct? To convince me that the dog was responsible, not him. This behavior is a common human tendency—to rationalize our actions.
To be human is to have enemies. Chances are, you know someone you struggle to love, or you know someone who doesn’t love you. Jesus assumes we will encounter enemies when He instructs us to “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matt. 5:44). The real question isn’t whether we will have enemies; it’s whether we will love and forgive, even at a great cost.
In 1 Samuel 24, we meet two very different men: Saul, the jealous and paranoid king, and David, the humble and courageous king. The lesson here is encapsulated in what David says in verse 12: “Let the Lord judge.” This highlights the power of a clean conscience.
As we explore this chapter, pay attention to David’s demeanor. While Saul hunts him like a dog, David is forced to hide in a cave, running for his life. When given a chance that most would seize, he chooses restraint. Why? This scripture offers profound insight into how God’s people should respond to opposition.
First, we learn from David to not take revenge (verses 4-7). Of all the places Saul could have gone to relieve himself, he chose the very spot where David and his men were hiding. Had it been anyone else, Saul would have met his end there. David’s men urged him in verse 4, “This is the day the Lord told you about when He said, ‘I will give your enemy into your hand, and you can do whatever you want to him.’” While David had every right to harm Saul—after all, he was the rightful king of Israel—he chose not to.
This sort of self-control seems rare today. When given the chance to retaliate against our enemies, we often leap at it, especially when we feel justified. The principle of “an eye for an eye” is far easier than forgiveness and self-restraint. David was tempted; he crept closer and even cut off a corner of Saul’s robe. Yet, as we see in verse 5, he felt remorse. A clean conscience mattered to David—he couldn’t harm the Lord’s anointed.
Despite Saul’s many attempts to kill him, David recognizes that it’s not about personal grievances. We often fixate on the pain others cause us and forget an essential truth: they, too, are chosen by God, created in His image. If they are Christians, they are redeemed by Christ; if not, they desperately need the Gospel. If we could look past our hurt, we would see their need for love and forgiveness.
Like David, we must be cautious of those who urge us to act on our natural instincts for revenge. Even well-intentioned friends may encourage us to justify bad behavior. If anyone tries to twist God’s command to love and forgive, be careful. God will never lead you to take revenge.
Second, we learn from David to make the first move (verses 8-15). David runs after Saul to clarify and resolve their conflict, risking much in the process. Communication is key in reconciliation. We often wait for the other person to reach out, especially if we believe they are in the wrong. We might think, “I won’t forgive until they ask for it.” However, being a Christian means embracing the unnatural. God equips us with the strength and courage to approach our enemies first.
David confronts Saul’s worries in verse 9, asking, “Why do you listen to the words of men who say, ‘Behold, David seeks your harm?’” Conflicts often arise from misunderstandings or misinformation. David clarifies his intentions in verse 13, stating, “But my hand shall not be against you.” The longer a conflict festers, the more distorted our views become. We must strive to clarify our motives as we seek reconciliation.
Who are you avoiding that you should pursue? Are you waiting for them to make the first move? Instead, take the initiative to clarify the situation and gently confront any misconceptions.
Finally, we learn from David to commit to doing good (verses 16-22). David and Saul reach an agreement, though Saul’s promise doesn’t last long; he soon returns to hunt David with 3,000 men. Yet, David remains committed to doing good for Saul and his household for as long as he is king. This commitment is evident in how David responds to Saul’s death (2 Sam. 1:17–27) and in the story of Mephibosheth (2 Sam. 9).
True reconciliation is marked by ongoing love and kindness. Conflict gives us an opportunity to grow closer, deepen our understanding of ourselves and others, and glorify God. If a genuine commitment to do good isn’t reached, then reconciliation hasn’t truly occurred. C.S. Lewis once noted, “Everyone thinks forgiveness is a lovely idea until he has something to forgive.”
Many of us cherish the idea of reconciliation, but when it comes time to act, we find it challenging.
Despite living in a cave and constantly on the run, David slept peacefully, knowing it wasn’t about him. His mindset was clear: “Let the Lord be my Judge.” God sees your behavior and stands by you. Let Him be your Judge and maintain a clean conscience.
David exemplifies this mindset in action. He resisted harming Saul, took the initiative, and sought the good of his enemy. We have much to learn from him.
Egon Pfeiffer, a German scholar from the last century, is credited with introducing the idea that the book of Malachi divides into six “disputation” speeches (formal arguments or debates), “rhetorical exchanges formed by a statement or affirmation, a denial or counter statement, and arguments to support the original statement” (Evangelische Theologie 19 (1959): 546–68). Others have followed his outline: (1) 1:2-5; (2) 1:6-2:9; (3) 2:10-16); (4) 2:17-3:5; (5) 3:6-12; (6) 3:13-4:3.
We have already seen what the first two arguments involve. The first dealt with Judah questioning God’s love, and the second had to do with the priests’ unfaithfulness to do their work. The argument surrounding the priests is the longest of the book, extending halfway through chapter two. That is followed by an argument about divorce (2:10-16). Near the end of chapter two, an argument is made about God’s justice.
But there is a central theme in this second chapter, when viewed as a whole (as it is divided in our Bibles). Notice the word “covenant,” found six times and cutting across the two major disputations of the chapter. This word, covenant,is “a technical term referring to the imposition of an obligation upon another” (Hughes, Lexham Theo Wdbk, np). The bottom line was that Judah contemptuously viewed God’s covenants that He laid down for them.
The priestly covenant (1-9). God calls out the disobedience of the priests and what spiritual cost they had to pay if they continued their rebellion (1-4). He reminds them of the blessings and prosperity that followed their obedience to His covenant in the past (5-7). Then, He reminds them that it is the role of the priest to teach, live, and preserve what is right (7). But they had failed in this basic, crucial role (8). Consequently, God was going to let them fail and fall (9).
The national covenant (10-12). As goes the leadership, so goes the followers. Malachi widens his focus to the entire nation. No longer addressing the priests, the prophet asks, “Do we not all have one father?” (10). The first person plural (we, us) is under consideration as he speaks of how everyone dealt treacherously with his brother (10). Not surprisingly, they dealt the same way with God (11-12), profaning His sanctuary and turning to idols. They had no regard for their promises and commitments to God.
The marriage covenant (13-17). The people of Judah had turned their backs on integrity. Their word was meaningless, from their worship to their treatment of their neighbors and brethren. Not surprisingly, this dishonesty crept into their homes and marriages. Men dealt treacherously with their companions, the wives of their youth by covenant (14). They discarded them like they were worthless, and God said He hates that (16). Doesn’t it get your attention to hear God talk about something He hates?!
Though God is changing the subject with another disputation in verse 17, we get a glimpse into His mindset as He speaks of being wearied by the people’s words. They were worthless. Another key word in chapter two is the word “treacherously,” found five times throughout. It means to deal deceitfully and unfaithfully. Integrity was forgotten. Honor and keeping their word was discarded. God had kept His end of the agreement, and He commands His people to restore their honor and keep the worship, community, and marriage covenants they had made. As Malachi 3:6 reminds us, God does not change. How does He feel today about us cheapening our commitments? All we need to do is reread Malachi 2!
[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]
So if those people agree with the reasoning behind our argument (that just because God is called “light” doesn’t mean that his body is “light”), then the same logic applies to the expression “a fire that destroys”. If God’s body is fire, what is fueling it? Do you really think he runs on wood, hay, or sticks? God is far too powerful to be fueled by these common things, if his body really is made of fire. He does burn up some things, though. He does completely destroy. What kind of stuff does he destroy? Evil thoughts, bad actions, and anything else that makes its way into the minds of people who believe. God and his son live within the minds of people who’ve been made capable of understanding his word and intelligence. He once said, “My father and I will come to them and live with them.” After God destroys and burns up the believer’s weaknesses and sinful desires, he makes them a temple worthy of him. Here’s how we answer people who say that because “God is spirit” he has a body of some kind: it’s very common for scripture to call anything that transcends our physical, solid bodies “spirit”. There’s the expression, “the written law brings death, but the spirit gives life.” It is obvious that “letter” means “physical” and “spirit” means “intellectual”. The same apostle also said, “Yes, even today, when they read the law of Moses, there is a covering over their minds. But when someone changes and follows the Master, that covering is taken away. The Master is the spirit, and there is freedom where his spirit is.” Anyone who hasn’t developed a deep, intellectual understanding has a covering over their heart. That covering is the same thing as a shallow understanding. Most people think that the sacred writings themselves are “covered” (their deeper meaning is hard to understand). This is why Moses covered his face when he read the law out loud to the people. That covering is removed from our understanding if and when we decide to follow the master. He is also the Logos of God, and his spirit allows us to understanding deeper meaning. When we decide to follow him that covering is removed from our understanding, and we’ll be able to see the true deeper meaning in the sacred writings.
Malachi would have been a contemporary of the reformers Ezra and Nehemiah. The exiles had returned from Babylonian Captivity almost a century before and, as Haggai demonstrates, they had become apathetic and indifferent. The excitement of repatriating their homeland, rebuilding the temple, restoring the law, and repairing the wall had waned. Thus, God found it necessary to send a spokesman with a “burden” (oracle, NAS) much as He had with Zechariah (9:1; 12:1). Yet, while Zechariah’s message was full of hope, Malachi’s tone is one of challenge and admonition. Clark and Hatton point out that the literary style of this short book is a series of dialogues or disputes, with three elements–Assertion, Objection, and Response (Handbook, UBS, 9). There are six of these disputes that form the outline of Malachi.
But, this dispute is not from an angry, wrathful God. Instead, the challenges from heaven are indications of His patient, steadfast love. A people refined and reprimanded through captivity still struggle with their sin and humanity, and a loving Father who wants the best for His children longs for them to be what they should be. These people apparently struggled with the same financial, relational, and spiritual trials we so often face. Malachi, as the last book of the Bible, “contains in miniature the essential message of the Old Testament, the Scriptures that Jesus revered and that his disciples used for their worship, preaching, and devotional life. It deals with the nature of God and the covenant member’s relationship and responsibility to him and to other members of the covenant community, as well as with our relationship to and responsibilities for our material possessions” (NAC, Vol. 21A, 203-204).
God gets straight to the point from the very outset of the book.
A Doubted Love (1-5). Despite God’s patience and providential care of His people, they were audacious enough to challenge God’s affirmation of love (2). How could they even think, “How have you loved us?” Perhaps the Bible reader goes back to Abraham and works his way through the exodus, the giving of the covenant, the conquering, and on and on. When we are spiritually struggling, we easily lose sight of heaven’s love. God contrasts His relationship with them and their nearby neighbor, Edom (2-5). Edom descended from Esau, the older son of Isaac. But, Jacob, the younger and far from perfect son, received the birthright and the blessing. God allowed this to happen, and among other things it was proof to Jacob’s (Israel’s) descendants of God’s love and favor. Their argument held absolutely no weight!
A Dishonored Father (6-10). God transitions from His initial grievance to a second one, pivoting off of the idea that He is a Father and these people are His children. As a God who clearly loved His children, He deserved their honor. Yet, they despised His name. He levels the charge against their worship leaders, the priests. The dishonor was evidenced in the defiled sacrifices (6-7). They attempted to offer God blind, lame, and sick animal offerings (8-10), things they would not offer earthly officials for fear of reprisal! But, they were trying to give it to God! To be clear, God tells them how He feels about it. “I am not pleased with you,” says the Lord of hosts, “nor will I accept an offering from you” (10).
A Defamed Name (11-14). God is still talking about their offerings in what He says next. He declares that His name is great, and for this reason their offering should reflect their recognition of that. Their offering should be a testimony to the nations around them that there is no God like Jehovah. Instead, they profane His name with offerings that are defiled and despised, given with a horrible attitude (13). The gifts were either blemished, stolen, sick, or defective. But, they expected that God should welcome it anyway. But, as He is a great king feared among the nations, such a sentiment is understandably offensive (14)!
There are at least two lessons I can apply from this. First, when I am tempted to doubt God’s love, I need to step back and look at the clear evidence. Whether it is the cross (Rom. 5:6-8) or the church (1 Pet. 2:9; Eph. 1:3), I have overflowing proof of His great love and His special, undeserved favor shown to me. Connected with that, I am reminded that my financial giving ought to reflect my appreciation and understanding of that love. I will not look for shortcuts or excuses to cut back on what I give to Him (whether financially or any other resource). I will give with an understanding of His unparalleled greatness and out of my awareness of His generosity and faith in His provision!
Given that the prophecies are thoroughly Messianic in this final section of the book, it influences when we see these events transpiring. Zechariah ends the book talking about the conditions that will persist when Messiah comes. His focus is both on the Savior and the saved. What will occur in that day?
The Destruction of Jerusalem (1-2). What Zechariah describes here sounds much like the warnings Jesus gives near the end of His public ministry, the fulfillment of which would come in AD 70 (Matt. 24; Mark 13; Luke 21). “The nations” here seem to point to the Roman Empire, as we will look more closely at momentarily (3-8). Verse two mirrors the apocalyptic description Jesus gives in the doom of the city. The day known to the Lord (7) seems to be that day
The Judgment of Rome (3-8). What Zechariah describes here sounds much like the thread that runs through the bulk of the book of Revelation. The instrument God used to bring the church into existence, which judged His physical people, the Jews, and which chose to persecute the church, Rome, would itself be overcome and fall. Any nation or people that exalts itself against God and fights against Him will lose. That loss is foretold here. The Messiah is depicted as a military commander (4). The church will come out victorious, and those who assaulted it will receive a just end.
The Exaltation of the Church (9-21). While there is a continuation of judgment language against the enemies of God’s people (12-19), the shift in focus is on the triumph of God’s people. Notice the tie to the Lord’s exaltation, in which His people share. “In that day,” the Lord will be the one and only, holy king (9). “In that day,” the Lord will rout His enemies (13). “In that day,” the holy name of the Lord will be inscribed and enshrined (20). “In that day,” God will take away the distinction between Jew and Gentile (21). The pictures of worship and fellowship point to the day when all nations enjoy a place in the house of the Lord.
Matthew Henry may be right in stating that the pictures in Zechariah 14 will not be perfectly fulfilled in the church, but only in heaven. But the “in that day” threat no doubt points to the coming of the Messiah in these last three chapters. As the window of inspiration is readying its closing, the prophets turn the hearts of the people to what is next. And what is next will impact not only the Jews, but the whole world!
There are three beautiful blessings highlighted by Zechariah in this short chapter. Again, he signals these with his repeated phrase, “in that day.” Often, he prefaces that by saying “it will come about.” He is underlining what the Messianic age would look like. When Christ came, what could be expected?
A Fountain Free (1). Jeremiah had used the fountain metaphor in his writings before captivity (2:13; 17:13; So will Joel 3:18). Have you ever wondered why we sing, “There’s a fountain free, ’tis for you and me?” No New Testament uses that imagery and applies it to Christ (the only reference to a fountain is James 3:11). This passage was undoubtedly pivotal. This fountain would be for sin and impurity. Jesus calls Himself living water (John 4:10-11), but Zechariah will deal with that (14:8). John will invoke the fountain imagery in Revelation 7:17. The promise? The Messiah would be the means of cleaning men from their sins (Eph. 5:26; Heb. 9:14; 1 Jn. 1:7,9).
The End Of Idolatry In Palestine (2). The first half of this verse explicitly promises that the days of idolatry would be over. That does not mean that sin struggles would cease, but this particular sin struggle–which had plagued Israel since before the giving of the Old Law (Ex. 32:4)–would no longer be a struggle. Hosea also shares this promise (2:16ff). Jesus combatted shallow righteousness among the religious leaders of His day (Mat. 5:20), but not idolatry. They learned their lesson once for all by the time Messiah came.
The End Of Prophecy And Unclean Spirits (2-6). I believe Homer Hailey is right in what the second half of verse two means. Brother Hailey wrote, “In the conquest of Christ over Satan and his forces, unclean spirits have ceased to control men as they did in the time of the ministry of Christ and the apostles” (A Commentary On The Minor Prophets, 392). When Jesus comes on the scene, unclean spirits inhabit individuals. This provides Christ an opportunity to demonstrate His power over Satan. The apostles would also demonstrate that power, as we see Luke record multiple times in Acts. This is certain. The ceasing of miracles would have to coincide with the disappearance of unclean spirits or you would have Satan possessing more power in this world than Christ does. Paul wrote that miracles, including prophecy, would cease (1 Cor. 13:8-13). Zechariah said there would be no unclean spirits overtaking people, thus no need to cast them out. Visions and prophecy would be replaced with a complete, written revelation of God’s will “in that day.”
A Rejected Shepherd (7). The last two promises are not signaled with Zechariah’s favorite phrase. Instead, what he writes here is quoted by Matthew as the prophecy is fulfilled at Jesus’ arrest in the garden of Gethsemane. Mark records its happening (14:50-52). Matthew records Jesus’ quotation of Zechariah 13:7, foretelling the apostles that later that night they would all scatter when He was arrested (26:31). “Little ones” is a favorite way for Jesus to refer to His trusting disciples (Mat. 10:42; 18:6,10,14; Mark 9:42; etc.). Jesus invoked the Shepherd-sheep imagery in His ministry (John 10:1ff), as do His disciples later (Heb. 13:20; 1 Pet. 5:4; Rev. 7:17).
A Refined People (8-9). Last of all in this chapter, we have the picture of how verse 7 would effect the followers of the Messiah. There is the immediate effect (8) and the ultimate effect (9). One sees clear parallels between these verses and Ezekiel 5, where the one-third and two-third imagery is employed. Though not in a premillennial sense, undoubtedly the words of Paul regarding “spiritual Israel” can be seen as a fulfillment of the idea here: “and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, ‘The Deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob. This is My covenant with them, When I take away their sins’” (Rom. 11:26-27). Though he quotes Isaiah there, it is synonymous with Zechariah’s overall message at the end of chapter 13. Those who think they want to follow Messiah will be refined in the furnace of persecution or trials or sin or priorities. Though we are 2000 years beyond the coming of the Messiah, we are subject to the same refinement. Jesus would say the majority will not come through with their faith intact (Mat. 7:13-14;22:14). But, for those who do, here is a beautiful promise: “They will call on My name, And I will answer them; I will say, ‘They are My people,’ And they will say, ‘The Lord is my God'” (8b; 2 Cor. 6:16; Heb. 8:10; Rev. 21:3).
The late David Pharr contends, “With the exception of Isaiah, there are more Messianic prophecies in Zechariah than in any other prophet” (“Repent and Rebuild–Zechariah, Spiritual Sword, 26.4, 40). In the last six chapters of this book, there is perhaps a higher concentration of Messianic prophecies than anywhere else in the Old Testament. This is signaled both by New Testament writers citing passages from here, but also through a repeated phrase: “in that day” (found 18 times from 9:16 to 14:21). Six of those are in chapter 12. With this phrase, the prophet is disclosing what things will be like when Messiah comes. Zechariah 12 is the second of two oracles with which the book ends (the first being ch. 9-11). It begins, as does the first, with the phrase, “The burden of the word of the Lord…” (1). Whereas the first ends on a down note, the second is full of hope and expectation centered around the coming Christ. There will be deliverance and restoration “in that day.”
The power of this prophecy is that it is declared by the same Lord who created everything, including man (1). In chapter 12, He begins His prophetic promises centering on Jerusalem and Judah as the focus of a needy world (2). Following that are six promises about that day.
Important (3). The world could hurl its attack against Christ’s kingdom, but it will not succeed (Heb. 12:22). Christ is the stone the builders rejected, and His church is built upon the rock of His identity. Even the gates of hades shall not prevail against it (Mat. 16:18-19).
Supported (4-5). It is an unshakable kingdom (Heb. 12:28). Think in terms of spiritual Jerusalem rather than literal Jerusalem, which would no longer be the focal point of God’s special protection (Gal. 4).
Preserved (6-7). Notice the prophet’s focus on the glory of God’s people in that day. They would be the first saved (Rom. 1:16), then salvation would come to the whole world.
Defended (8-9). The divine protection of those who will follow the One to come in that day is further noted here.
Penitent (9-10). In this passage, we have a Messianic prophecy quoted by John (19:37). This is fulfilled at the cross of Calvary, leading people at Jesus’ death to begin to contemplate their own sinfulness and the unjust death of Christ. They will weep over Him.
Sorrowful (11-14). Great mourning would occur among the descendants of kings, prophets, and priests, at the sacrifice of the One who is all of these in one person. Every family would mourn. A personal understanding of our own guilt and His innocence leads to godly sorrow (2 Cor. 7:9-11).
S.R. Driver, the famous Hebrew Lexicographer (B.D.B. Lexicon), tells us this about Zechariah 11, that it “stands as the most enigmatic passage in the whole Old Testament” (The Minor Prophets, 23). It is said to be the most difficult chapter of the book. How does it fit with the context, and what is Zechariah trying to say?
The narrative. A sweeping judgment from the north to the south is described in 11:1-3. Lebanon and Bashan would be in Israel (northern kingdom) and the jungle area of the Jordan described would be in Judah (southern kingdom). In 11:4-14, God compares His people to a flock of sheep. They are led by false or bad shepherds (4-6) and they themselves are described as “doomed to slaughter.” Zechariah takes the shepherd job and takes two staffs, named Favor and Union (7). He pastures the flock and destroys the bad shepherds (7-8), but is weary of the job and gives up on the sheep (9-11). He asks his wages, and is paid so little that he discards it (12-14). The Lord tells him to reassume the role, symbolizing a worthless, uncaring shepherd who will suffer for his poor shepherding (15-17).
The meaning. This proves far more difficult to definitely decide. It seems Page Kelley is right, succinctly summarizing, “It has something significant to say about the crisis of leadership in Jerusalem after the Exile. It attributes the oppression from without and the strife from within to Israel’s rejection of her God-given leaders. In rejecting them, she had effectively rejected the rule of God in her affairs” (Laymen, Vol. 14, 140). There was definitely a leadership crisis after the exile in Babylon. See Ezra and Nehemiah for further confirmation. The staff, Favor, represents God’s grace. It is broken by the people’s willful sin. The staff, Union, represents the unity of God’s people. It is broken by division, well-chronicled in the Old Testament. Thirty pieces of silver is “the equivalent of the value of a Hebrew slave (cf. Exod. 21:32), is such a trifle that it is cast unto the potter” (Lewis, Minor Prophets, 79). The poor leadership of the latter shepherds reveals the futile state of affairs which will still exist when the Good Shepherd appears on the scene.
The application. We have already established the compelling comparison which Jesus amplifies, distinguishing Himself from all other shepherds. Read John 10:1-18, where Jesus speaks of His leadership as a Shepherd who will make it possible for all sheep (Jews and Gentiles) to come to Him for abundant life (11). He will lay down His life for the sheep (17-18). Further, Matthew will quote verse 13 and apply it to Judas’ betrayal in Matthew 27:9-10. There is also an application for leadership among the sheep in the Good Shepherd’s flock. Scripture admonishes elders to shepherd the flock with self-discernment and conscientiousness (Acts 20:28). It even tells them how to do so effectively and how they will be rewarded for doing the job well (1 Peter 5:1-4).
This chapter looks beyond the leadership crisis of latter Old Testament history to the unfolding of God’s eternal plan centered in Jesus. It encourages us even today to follow God’s plan and be good followers of His appointed shepherds. It also sets the table for the grand finale, where Zechariah focuses on the Messianic Age in the last three chapters.
[Editor’s Note: Gary is translating the Ante-Nicene Fathers works, beginning with Origin’s work. It is meant to update the British English of Roberts and Donaldson. What follows is part of that translation]
I know that some people will try to say that God is physical somehow. This is because Moses said “Our God is a fire that destroys.” And in John’s gospel, “God is spirit, so the people who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” According to those people, these are clear proofs that God has a body. Fire and spirit are tangible things, and those passages say that God is those things. But I have to ask those people: what do you do with the verse that says “God is light”? The same John also wrote “God is light, and there is no darkness in him at all.” It’s true! God is the light that gives us an understanding of truth, at least to people who are capable of taking it in. One of the Psalms says, “Your light lets us see light.” Is there any other kind of light that can bring enlightenment? Only God’s influence can give us an understanding of what is true. His influence is what leads us to him, because he is truth itself. That’s what the expression “your light allows us to see light” means — his light is Jesus, who makes it possible for us to see the father. Just because God is called “light” doesn’t mean that it’s like the light of the sun. It would be absurd for anyone to think that sunlight gives them access to the primal source of knowledge. It would be absurd to think that sunlight could lead someone to understand truth.
Zechariah, in the last six chapters of his prophecy, is looking ahead to the Messianic Age. By definition, Scripture would speak of that as a time of ultimate deliverance. They had been freed from Babylonian Captivity, but they were still not free, autonomous people. Nor would they be, physically or politically. But, as Isaiah 59:20 promises and Romans 11:26 shows Christ as the fulfillment, Messiah would be a spiritual deliverer. That imagery is displayed in chapter ten.
God would deliver them from want (1). The Lord is the only source of providential care and natural resources. Ask Him, for He gives rain and vegetation to each man. Contrast that to what false teachers and poor leaders promised and offers, all in vain.
God would deliver them from idolatry (2). The prophets, especially Isaiah, speak of how profitless and foolish it is to trust in inanimate objects of their own hands, which they then in turn worship! They are at once evil and impotent. This sinful guidance led the people to wander, but returning to God would bring them back.
God would deliver them from poor leadership (2-3). The prophets, like Ezekiel, devote much time to the selfish, self-serving shepherds who actually inflict violence on the charges they are appointed to protect. Here, Zechariah tells his readers that the Lord will take over for these violent, unreliable shepherds. His sheep would no longer wander, and God would punish the leadership.
God would deliver them from the enemy (4-5). The rest of this chapter is devoted to battlefield imagery. Salvation is depicted as a military victory. Judah (southern kingdom) and Ephraim (northern kingdom) would share in this victory. Rejection would be replaced with compassion and acceptance.
God would deliver them from wandering (6-12). For a people thoroughly accustomed to exile, what picture could exceed the hope of restoration and return? Notice the words pointing to this–gather together (8), redeemed (8), and bring back (10). The enemies would be brought low and defeated, from every direction whether north (Assryria) or south (Egypt). They would be as numerous and prosperous as in earlier times, only (as we will see) not primarily or exclusively in material terms. Messiah would focus on redemption and salvation.
What motivates us to pray? Proper motivation is praying with God’s will in mind and we can be sure that His will is for us to know Jesus.
In Matthew 8.2 the leper asks Jesus to heal Him but the way in which he asks Jesus is telling. He says,
“Lord, you have the power to heal me if you want.”
That’s another way of saying, “Lord, if it’s your will, you can heal me.”
Consider the following verses:
“If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you” (John 15.7).
“Now this is the confidence that we have in Him, that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us. And if we know that He hears us, whatever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we have asked of Him” (I John 5.14-15).
2. Pray With Proper Priorities
(Mark 2.1-12)
A paralytic is lowered through the roof by his friends but Jesus cleanses him of his sin first, then mends his physical problem. What is God’s will? Your spiritual wellbeing. Prioritize your prayer life by placing spiritual health at the top.
Some profound events are captured in a relatively short amount of space in the Bible. The narrative of Jesus’ birth really takes up only seven verses in Matthew (1:18-25) and seven verses in Luke (2:1-7). The resurrection is not described at all, but mention of it is confined to a few verses in each of the four gospels. Even the establishment of the church, from the apostles being filled with the Spirit to the sermon, the response, and the events immediately thereafter in all of 47 verses.
Contrast that with some of the longest chapters in the Bible. There are at least two different ways to tally this distinction (number of verses and number of words). In number of words per chapter in descending order, the list is Psalm 119, 1 Kings 8, Deuteronomy 28, Numbers 7, Leviticus 13, Jeremiah 51, Ezekiel 16, Genesis 24, 1 Samuel 17, and Leviticus 14. In number of verses per chapter in descending order, the list is Psalm 119, Numbers 7, 1 Chronicles 6, Luke 1, Matthew 26, Nehemiah 7, Mark 14, Psalm 78, John 6, and Luke 22.
We understand that modern chapter divisions were made by Stephen Langston early in the 13th Century, and the Ben Asher family divided the Hebrew Bible into verses around 900 AD and the modern division into verses was made by Robert Estienne in the 16th Century. Originally, Bible books were not divided into chapters and verses. That was added to aid in readability. Yet, it is the informed opinion of individuals with an excellent grasp of content and comprehension that the content in those chapters are of a fairly uniformed topic.
There are some lessons to be learned from those long chapters, if we struggle with wondering why God devoted so much attention and information to matters that we find baffling. Let’s consider five lessons from the five longest chapters.
Lesson: GOD’S WORD IS VALUABLE, BENEFICIAL, AND MATCHLESSLY IMPORTANT (Psalm 119). In 22 stanzas (the same number of letters in the Hebrew alphabet), David tells us “from A to Z” why there’s no book like the Bible! The length and excess of the chapter, with its 176 verses, highlights this beautiful fact. How do I view God’s Word?
Lesson: WORSHIP IS IMPORTANT TO GOD (1 Kings 8). In 66 verses and over 2100 words, we have the dedication of the temple by Solomon. From Solomon’s prayer to the prolific amount of sacrifices, the grandeur and glory of God is on full display and in full view. How do I view the privilege of worship?
Lesson: OBEDIENCE AND DISOBEDIENCE HAVE CONSEQUENCES (Deuteronomy 28). In Deuteronomy 11:29, Moses identifies Mount Gerizim as the mount of blessing and Mount Ebal as the mount of cursing. Deuteronomy 28, continuing the ritual recorded in the previous chapter, is a list of blessings and curses depending on what people do with God’s Word. The sheer repetition of especially the curses reminds us that God’s Word cannot be trifled with. We forget or rebel against God, and it will cost us!
Lesson: LEADERS SET THE TONE IN GIVING AND SACRIFICE (Numbers 7). While the giving and sacrifice in this chapter is literal and material, we glean such an important principle even under the New Testament covenant. Elders, deacons, teachers, and preachers who call for others to be generous and sacrificial in time, talent, and treasure must go first and show the way! Leaders do not offer the Lord that which costs them nothing (2 Sam. 24:24).
Lesson: PURITY IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO GOD (Leviticus 13). Moses gives an exhaustive set of tests to determine the presence of leprosy, giving a myriad of scenarios. But, as he refers to infectiousness, keeping uncleanness in check was indispensable. Often, leprosy symbolizes sin-sickness and the parallels abound. Leprosy required the involvement of a priest and so does sin. Leprosy comes from within, and so does sin. Leprosy affects the flesh, and so does sin. Leprosy is called uncleanness, and so is sin.
Sometimes we wonder why so much space is devoted to matters that we might find obscure or redundant. The deeper we dig and the more often we study, the greater our appreciation is for the truth Paul proclaims in 2 Timothy 3:16-17. It builds our confidence in the divine source of Scripture and the vast benefits we derive from studying and incorporating it into our lives.
It has been said that “the final section of the book of Zechariah offers some of the richest theological insights the Old Testament has to offer” (Klein, NAC, Vol. 21B, 253). C.H. Dodd says that these six chapters may have had a more direct influence over the gospel writers than any other Old Testament passages (According To The Scriptures, 64-65). C.A. Ham says Matthew alone alludes to Zechariah at least eight times (The Coming King And The Rejected Shepherd, 2005).
Here are eight direct quotations New Testament writers make of Zechariah:
Zechariah 9:9 ——–> Matthew 21:5; John 12:15
Zechariah 11:13 ——–> Matthew 27:9
Zechariah 12:3 ——–> Luke 21:24
Zechariah 12:10 ——–> John 19:37; Revelation 1:7
Zechariah 13:7 ——–> Matthew 26:31; Mark 14:27
Zechariah 14:5 ——–> 1 Thessalonians 3:13
Zechariah 14:8 ——–> John 7:38
Zechariah 14:21 ——–> John 2:16
In addition to the direct quotations, so many themes of New Testament writers can trace their origins to Zechariah’s prophecy, like sheep without a shepherd (13:7), faith moving mountains (14:4), the Son of man coming with His angels (14:5), and the New Jerusalem (14:6-12). John, in the book of Revelation, has a particular fondness for the way Zechariah puts things. He alludes to at least eleven different images from our present book of study.
Suffice it to say that not only do we profit from studying what Zechariah is saying to his own contemporaries, but we also confirm our faith in the reliability of the Old Testament prophecies when we see so much of it fulfilled in the New.
Chapter nine seems to divide neatly into three sections: 1) vs. 1-8, 2) vs. 9-11, and 3) vs. 12-17. Zechariah foretells the judgment of the surrounding nations in the first section, the coming of their glorious king, and the victory of that king. Let’s notice these sections more closely.
Judgment On Judah’s Neighbors(1-8). Zechariah’s focus is on the conquering of Syria (1-2), Phoenicia (2-4), and Philistia (5-7) by Alexander the Great (see Josephus’ Antiquities 10:1.8). These are physical conquering, but the idea that no oppressor would pass over them anymore (8) seems certainly to foreshadow the coming of the Messiah and the spiritual triumph He would bring in the Christian Age.
The Triumphal King (9-11). Eight words capture the essence of this triumphal entry.
Rejoicing (9)–“Rejoice greatly…shout.” He must enter Jerusalem to complete His atoning work, and the initial response of the people is to celebrate His entrance (Mark 11:9). He would triumph over sorrow (Matt. 11:28-30).
Royalty (9)–“Behold, your king is coming to you.” He is King of kings (1 Tim. 6:15), though His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36). He would triumph over any rival.
Right (9)–“He is just.” He would triumph over the injustice so common in Old Testament times (Ezek. 22:12), so common in His own time (Matt. 23), and so common in every age (Rom. 3:23). He is just and the justifier of those who believe in Him (Rom. 3:26).
Redemption (9)– “He is endowed with salvation.” He would triumph over Satan (cf. Heb. 2:14-15).
Reserved (9)–“Humble.” He would triumph over sinful pride. What an incongruous picture, that their king would come not on a steed or stallion but mounted on a donkey. He bore to perfection the trait of humility.
Rest (10)– “He will speak peace to the nations.” He would triumph over man’s problems. There is no possible peace apart from Him (John 14:27).
Reigning (10)–“His dominion…” He would be triumphant over the world. Christ has been given all authority in heaven and on earth (Matt. 28:18). He is head over all things to the church (Eph. 1:22-23). Any who do not submit to His reign in this life will bow in prostrate, abject humility at the Judgment (Phil. 2:10-11). Only then it will be too late. One must submit to the dominion of Christ in this life by becoming a Christian. After this life is the Judgment (Heb. 9:27), at which time the disobedient will be consigned to eternal torment (cf. Eph. 5:6).
Reconciliation (10)–“And His dominion will be from sea to sea, And from the River to the ends of the earth.” He would be triumphant over division. The gospel is for all!
The Victorious King (12-17). This king would bring promise to the “prisoners who have hope” (12-13). Some turbulent days stood between them and the coming of Messiah, but they would be set free from their greatest problem, sin, when He appeared. There would be restoration from their unmatched warrior.
This king would bring protection to them (14-15). Zechariah invokes more battle imagery here. He appears with arrows like lightning, blows a heavenly trumpet, marching, devouring, and defending against their enemies. In the wake of the victory He brings, they would bask in the victory celebration that follows.
This king would bring preciousness about through them (16-17). They would be His own flock. They would be jewels in His crown. They would be seen as comely and beautiful.
These words cannot be viewed through earthly, materialistic eyes, though the Jews in Jesus’ day no doubt did so. They were living under Persian reign as the prophet writes, but he speaks much in this context of the Greek Imperial reign to come. After them, we know, the Roman Empire would rule their land. But the Messiah was bringing something that transcended these in time and power. His would be an indestructible, eternal kingdom (Dan. 2:44). He would bring all spiritual blessings (Eph. 1:3ff). That was the ultimate expectation the prophet points them to, and it is still our ultimate expectation today!
Whereas they had had a checkered past that earned captivity, Judah looked ahead with hope. Zechariah shares God’s message of love and invitation to be restored. The tone changes and the focus shifts to the bright days ahead for a humbled, penitent people. All of it centered around the character, nature, and attributes of God.
JEHOVAH’S JEALOUSY (1-2). Zechariah says God is “exceedingly jealous” and “with great wrath” He is “jealous.” That word means to get red in the face from jealousy. It speaks of getting excited and heated with a zealousness that moves one to fight for or against something. Why is this a hopeful statement? The Lord feels this for His people, and He will act in their favor against the nations who had carried them away into captivity. His passion is now on restoring them and reestablishing them in Zion and Jerusalem (3).
JEHOVAH’S FELLOWSHIP (3-6). The Lord says He will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem with His people, content elderly people (4) and happy, playing children (5). The most vulnerable of society will go about their lives in peace and without worry. While that may seem like a pipe dream, it’s fulfillment is contingent on God’s ability to make it happen. Thus, it is assured.
JEHOVAH’S SALVATION (7-8). The salvation He mentions is from being dispersed from abroad (from east and west)(7). The picture is of intimacy, God saying, “They shall be My people, and I will be their God in truth and righteousness” (8). Contextually, this salvation is physical and national (Ezekiel prophecies of these moments in Ezekiel 11:20; 36:28), but it foreshadows a salvation that will be described in very similar words at the end of the Bible (Rev. 21:3).
JEHOVAH’S ENCOURAGEMENT (9). God is doing the encouraging and exhorting, but notice how He does so. It is through the mouth of the prophets. A sentiment that first appears in Isaiah’s writing will be a golden thread throughout the centuries, even to today: “How lovely on the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news, who announces peace
and brings good news of happiness, who announces salvation, and says to Zion, ‘Your God reigns!'” (Isa. 52:7). We see it again in Nahum 1:15, Romans 10:15, and Ephesians 6:15, and implied in so many other passages. These words of encouragement, through the prophets, were to finish the work God gave them in rebuilding the temple.
JEHOVAH’S PROMISES (10-15). Notice them in this paragraph, offered to the whole community:
They would be treated better than their fathers (the punishment and strife of captivity replaced with emancipation and production)(10-11).
They would have abundant, fruitful harvest instead of barrenness (12).
They would be a blessing rather than a curse (13).
They would be the object of God’s good in place of the harm He previously brought (14-15).
JEHOVAH’S CHARGE (16-17). God admonishes Judah to be ethically sound, speaking truth and justice (16). They were to root out evil from their hearts against each other, and do right from the inside out (17). Why? Most of all, God hates such things. Second, it was the way for peace to be in their gates. God’s commands bring blessings to the obedient and prevent punishment upon those who would be disobedient.
JEHOVAH’S INCENTIVE (18-23). By embracing God’s promises and obeying God’s charge, they could anticipate feasting where there had been fasting (19). Their role was to “love truth and peace” (19; Amos 5:15). They would be honored and respected among the nations whereas they had been despised by them (20-22). They would be esteemed whereas they had been scorned. In a unique promise, God says of those days, “ten men from all the nations will grasp the garment of a Jew, saying, ‘Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you'” (23). Compare these verses with Psalm 126!
The days were coming when the Gentiles would be gathered into God’s kingdom. Zechariah has intimated this (2:11), as had other inspired messengers (Isa. 2:1-4; Mic. 2:1-4). The Jews’ hope all along, as we see in Zechariah, was the Jehovah they knew and loved being embraced and accepted by all men. This, of course, was fulfilled in Christ (Eph. 2:11-15)!
The Preacher Pollard Blog 