Tag: Jesus

The Prodigal Son

Carl Pollard

In our fast-paced world, many things that were once considered cutting-edge are now becoming outdated. Think about it: we’ve swapped VHS tapes for CDs, Walkmans for iPods, and pagers for smartphones. Traditional taxi cabs are facing tough competition from rideshare services like Uber and Lyft, which millions of people use every day. And it’s all too common for passengers to leave behind valuable items. This year alone, nearly half a million phones, 300,000 wallets, and 100,000 wedding rings were forgotten in these vehicles.

Among the lost items, some stories stand out. One Uber driver discovered an ankle monitor left behind, while another found a pet turtle chilling in the back seat. And then there’s the passenger who accidentally left a complete missile guidance system from Lockheed Martin. We have difficulty keeping up with our belongings, a challenge that many parents might relate to, having temporarily misplaced their kids at least once.

We all know that sinking feeling when we lose something valuable. It usually happens when we’re in a rush, and the more we search, the more frustrated we become. It’s a mix of annoyance at ourselves and disbelief that it happened in the first place. We might even start questioning the intentions of those around us, convinced that someone has moved our stuff. 

This feeling of loss is central to what Jesus talks about in the parable of the Prodigal Son, found in Luke 15:11-32. This story is so well-known that even the non-religious might recognize it. It unfolds as Jesus addresses the Pharisees, explaining why He chooses to hang out with tax collectors and sinners. Unlike the judgmental Pharisees, Jesus shows genuine love and compassion for the lost, just like the Father.

Each parable He shares builds on the last, emphasizing the intrinsic value of every lost soul. In the parable of the lost sheep, even one sheep out of a hundred matters to God. In the story of the lost coin, one out of ten holds significance. And in the Prodigal Son’s tale, the focus is on one son out of two, illustrating various ways people can find themselves lost. Some wander off ignorantly, like sheep without a shepherd, while others, like the lost coin, get distracted by the world around them. The younger son represents those who rebel against what they know is right, and the older brother embodies self-righteousness, blind to his own lost state.

As we dig into this parable, keep in mind that it’s not just about a wayward son; it’s a powerful exploration of God’s grace and the unwavering love of the Father.

Departure (11-13)

The story kicks off with the younger son asking for his inheritance while his father is still alive—a request that would have hit hard. Those listening, especially the Pharisees and scribes, would have been shocked. This wasn’t just rebellious behavior; it was downright disrespectful—essentially wishing his father dead. Yet, the father grants his son’s wish, demonstrating a love that respects free will, even when it leads to foolish choices. God wants us to make wise decisions, but He gives us the freedom to wander away.

The son takes his inheritance, and what follows is a stark reminder: chasing after pleasure often leads to emptiness.

Descent (14-16)

As the money dries up and the partying comes to an end, the son’s descent into despair becomes evident. Feeding pigs—a job repugnant to his Jewish upbringing—symbolizes how far he has fallen. His life spirals out of control, and he ends up with nothing. The more he indulges, the less satisfaction he finds. Jesus makes a point of saying, “no one gave him anything,” marking his rock bottom.

If you find yourself in a similar situation, how you respond next can change everything.

Decision (17-19)

In his misery, the son finally comes to his senses. He realizes he’s not the person he should be and that he misses his father. Instead of blaming others or wallowing in self-pity, he focuses on his father. He declares, “I will arise and go to my father.” This is how we need to return to God—by focusing on Him, not the mess we’ve made. When we’re lost, the only thing that truly matters is the Father.

The lost son shows us what true repentance looks like—a change of heart that leads to a change in direction. He shifts from “Father, give me” to “Father, make me,” and it’s the latter that brings him the joy he desperately seeks.

Return (20-24)

Finally, the son gets up and heads back to his father. While he’s still a distance away, his father sees him and runs to embrace him, filled with compassion. The father showers him with love and gifts—a ring, a robe, and a feast. The son starts to recite his carefully prepared speech, but it seems the father hardly hears it. Just the act of returning speaks volumes about the son’s heart.

The father doesn’t merely accept him back; he honors and blesses him, showing the depth of his love and grace.

In essence, the parable of the Prodigal Son isn’t just a story of loss and redemption; it’s a powerful reminder of the love that awaits us when we choose to turn back to the Father.

Amos: THE LORD ROARS (II)

“For Three Transgressions…And For Four” (Part 2)(2:1-16)

Neal Pollard

Amos two represents a poor chapter break. The judgments on the five nations in chapter one shared in common that they were Semitic people who were not God’s promised people. Amos 2:1-3 mentions one more such people, then Amos 2:4-16 deals with judgments on Judah and Israel (His covenant people who were divided). It becomes apparent that the major focus of the prophet’s writings is Israel, as he saves his worst and his most for last. 

Moab is guilty of atrocities against Edom, much like Tyre and Philistia. They burned the bones of the king of Edom, and for this God was going to render judgment with fire (2). He bluntly says that Moab would die and her leaders are specifically identified (2-3). 

Then, God turns His gaze to Abraham’s descendants, the children of promise (4-16). First, there is Judah. Notice that the nature of their sin is connected to their relationship to the Law. They rejected it, neglected it, and forsook it (4). Thus, they faced a judgment of fire (5).

What you will notice is that Amos is now ready to concentrate his message to his primary audience, Israel (6-16). The thoroughness, detail, and specifics are withering. The central issue is greed and covetousness. As the inspired apostle later writes, “But those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a snare and many foolish and harmful desires which plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all sorts of evil, and some by longing for it have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs” (1 Tim. 6:9-10). Look at the sorts of evil Amos mentions concerning Israel.

  • They sell the righteous for money (6).
  • They sell the needy for a pair of sandals (6).
  • They take advantage of the helpless (7).
  • They shove the oppressed out of the way (7, NLT).
  • Father and son slept with the same woman (7).
  • They corrupted their religious practices (8).
  • They ignored God’s judgment upon others (9).
  • They forgot God’s past deliverance (10). 
  • They rejected their God-given privileges and blessings (11), even abusing them (12).

Therefore, they faced an inescapable judgment (13-16). They would groan, not escape, lose strength, and their military would collapse and desert their posts. Every earthly thing they rested their trust in would fail them. The old hymn, Stand Up For Jesus, admonishes, “The arm of flesh will fail you, you dare not trust your own.” But that is exactly what Israel did. Just because they were God’s people did not insulate them from His absolutely righteous judgment. 

Amos: THE LORD ROARS (I)

What do you know about the prophet Amos? Let’s begin our study together of this unique Bible book

“For Three Transgressions…And For Four” (1:1-15)

Neal Pollard

Amos was the first of the writing prophets, with best estimates placing his work between 783-746 B.C. That would place him as earliest among three other writers, Hosea, Isaiah, and Micah, who would have been roughly contemporaries. Amos, like Hosea, focuses on Israel (northern kingdom), and Isaiah and Micah prophecy to Judah (southern kingdom). These dates are derived from the reigns of Uzziah and Jeroboam II (1), as ancient historians do not give a date for the apparently famous earthquake (1; Zech. 14:5).

Amos has no pedigree preceding his prophetic preaching. He is a herdsman (1) and a farmer who tended to fig trees (7:14). While some have concluded that this made him either poor or uneducated, the text does not back up such a claim. As James Smith notes, at least five things from his writing suggest a formidable thinker and writer:

(1) He was well acquainted with the world of his day. He mentions the names of at least thirty-eight towns and districts of the ancient Near East. (2) He had a keen awareness of the history, not only of his own people, but of foreign peoples as well. (3) He possessed a note of objectivity and sternness. (4) He was forthright in the presentation of the word of God. (5) He was a literary master and an incomparable preacher” (OT Survey Series, 129). 

The prophet, though he hails from Judah, speaks resoundingly of God’s judgment against Israel and other, surrounding nations. It would come violently. He will present this message within a series of visions, making application as he goes. Donald Sunukjian outlines the book as containing the roar of judgment (ch. 1-2), the reasons for judgment (ch. 3-6), and the results of judgment (ch. 7-9)(BKC, 1427). When the Lord roars in judgment, man withers and wails (2). 

Chapter one begins Amos’ message of judgment against the transgressions of five of Israel’s neighbors. Each time, the prophet begins the rebuke with the phrase, “For three transgressions…and for four.” This is a literary device often found in the Old Testament. It is as if God has been compiling a list, and the last item on the list is like the straw that breaks the camel’s back. The last is a bridge too far, the violation that causes God to act. Read Proverbs 30 for several examples of this stylistic device. Some have suggested that 3 plus 4 equals 7, a perfect number meaning that the sin was so complete and full that God would act. In this chapter, only the final sin is specifically mentioned.

  1. Syria, led by Hazael and Ben-hadad, did wicked and sinister things against Israel (2 Kings 8:12; 13:7). For this, God would allow them to suffer greatly and go into exile (3-5).
  2. Philistia deported God’s people into slavery, and this would lead to their own destruction (6-8). 
  3. Phoenicia, like Philistia, deported Israel the Edomites. For this, these traitors of brethren would be destroyed with fire (9-10).
  4. Edom, who brokered with slave traders for Israel, is condemned for selling out their “brother” (Edom descended from Esau, and of course Israel was the name of Jacob). Rather than being compassionate and supportive, they were treacherous against Israel (11-12).
  5. Ammon, in violence against Israel, attacked pregnant mothers and aborted their babies. God would vanquish them and cause them to go into exile (13-15).

A theme emerges against nations like these, surrounding Israel. Though Israel had sins of her own which God would judge, these nations would fall to the Assyrians for their own wickedness. Their time had come, and they had not repented. God would not allow it to go unchecked. 

Joel: JUDGMENT (V)

Why does the Bible associate certain events of life as being on a mountain and others being in the valley? What do the valleys in Joel 3 represent and why?

“Multitudes, Multitudes, In The Valley Of Decision” (3:1-21)

Neal Pollard

While the first two chapters center squarely on the sin, consequences, call for repentance, and restoration of God’s people, the final chapter is completely focused on God’s judgment upon the nations (2). They who have punished, harassed, and threatened Judah (see 17-21) will themselves be defeated and judged by the God who comes to the rescue of His people. The enemies will be put down, while His people would be raised up. 

Notice the five references to valleys in this chapter. Joel refers to the “valley of Jehoshaphat” (2,12), the “valley of decision” (14), and the “valley of acacias” (“valley of Shittim”)(18). Garrett explains, “The word ‘Jehoshaphat’ means ‘Yahweh judges’ and is most often identified with the famous valley of Jezreel extending from Mount Carmel past Megiddo and on to Bet Shean and the Jordan River” (NAC, 380). We more commonly refer to it as Armageddon. Battles are typically fought in valleys and not on high places. The battle takes place between God and the heathen nations (9-12). God is judge and army! 

The enemies are identified as Tyre, Sidon, and Philistia (4). They had mistreated Judah (6), but God was going to recompense them for that (7). He describes their fate in apocalyptic terms like the sun, moon, and stars being affected by Him (15), then ends with this thundering judgment: “The Lord roars from Zion And utters His voice from Jerusalem, And the heavens and the earth tremble. But the Lord is a refuge for His people And a stronghold to the sons of Israel” (16). 

What is so terrible for those on the wrong side of judgment is peace and promise for His faithful. Joel ends the book with five verses of hopeful promise to the righteous. As the result of His bringing judgment on the Gentiles, God expected that His people would recognize His power and identity (17), experience His profuse blessings (18), witness His vindication of them (19, 21), and enjoy perpetual habitation in God’s promised place (20). The ultimate fulfillment of such hopes stands in front of us, as God’s people in Christ. Saved from sin, we should acknowledge His power to accomplish it (Eph. 2:8-9), relish His spiritual blessings (Eph. 1:3), experience His judgment (1 Pet. 4:17; Mat. 25:31ff), and anticipate a dwelling with Him forever (John 14:1-4). 

Joel: JUDGMENT (IV)

What is one of the clearest Messianic prophecies in the Minor Prophets? Maybe you think of Micah 5:2 or Zechariah 12-14. What about Joel 2:28-32? What makes it so significant?

A Promise Fulfilled Through The Apostles (2:28-32)

Neal Pollard

After the national restoration of God’s people, another promise loomed over the horizon of time. Joel does not specify a timetable, but Doctor Luke helps us understand when it was fulfilled. He records Peter’s first gospel sermon, preached the Pentecost following the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, in Acts two. Duane Garrett says, “According to Acts 2:17, Peter understood this phrase in an eschatological sense and so paraphrased it as ἐν ταῖς ἐσχάταις ἡμέραις (“in the last days”). The LXX (Greek O.T., NP) has μετὰ ταῦτα, “after these things.” Peter’s transformation of the text implies that he believed that he and his contemporaries had witnessed the beginning of the messianic age” (NAC, 367). More precisely, the Holy Spirit guided Peter to this conclusion (John 16:13). 

Let us look at this Messianic promise more closely.

Who was the promise for (28-29)? Notice the universal nature of the promise, of the elderly and the young and of men and women. Joel says, “All mankind” (literally, “all flesh”). This is a promise frequently found in the prophets. Isaiah 44:3 speaks of pouring out the Spirit on their offspring. Ezekiel speaks of the Spirit being poured out on the house of Israel (39:29). Zechariah refers to the Spirit being poured out on the house of David and inhabitants of Jerusalem on that day (12:10). The significance of Joel’s prophecy is that it would be on all mankind. The Jewish fulfillment is on Pentecost, and Peter quotes Joel. The servants and the rest of mankind, Gentiles, find their fulfillment in the conversion of Cornelius and his household (Acts 10:48).  Read also Acts 11:15, Acts 21:9, and 1 Corinthians 11:5. 

How would the promise be known (28-31)? Gifts would accompany the outpouring of the Spirit. Dreams, visions, and prophecy would result from it. Joel speaks apocalyptically of the wonders preceding this great and awesome day. James Smith gives a wonderful summary of the implications of this timing: “The immediate reference here is to the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in a.d. 70. Yet every judgment in history is a forerunner of the final eschatological judgment with which time ends and eternity begins” (OT Survey, 88). The gifts accompanied the establishment of the church and the preaching of the gospel. In the absence of completed revelation, these gifts would confirm the message the Spirit spoke through His messengers (1 Cor. 13:1-13). While the gifts would be tied to the good news, there was judgment to come on those who rejected God’s eternal plan. This would be realized with the judgment prediction shared by Joel (30-31). 

What would the promise bring (32)? Despite there being a reckoning for the unbelieving and disobedient (cf. 2 Thess. 1:7-9), look at the beautiful prospect for the believers. There would be deliverance and escape! Those who answer the gospel call would be saved. Paul will quote Joel 2:32 in Romans 10:13 when describing the importance of preaching the gospel. The promise would be for those who call on the name of the Lord (Acts 2:21). Peter speaks of the Lord calling to Himself those who would repent and be baptized for the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:39). Later, when Saul of Tarsus awaited instructions on what to do to be saved from his sins, Ananias tells him, “‘Now why do you delay? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His name'” (Acts 22:16). This will literally begin on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem (32).

Peter removes any doubt about the import of this text, saying, “But this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel” (Acts 2:16). From this proof text, Peter begins the first gospel sermon, saying, “Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles, wonders, and signs…” (Acts 2:22). What a reminder that even in the midst of spiritually dark times, God extends hope to the penitent. In judgment, there is also salvation. 

Joel: JUDGMENT (III)

Think back to a time when sin was in control of your life. You surrendered your relationship with God and felt the devastation. Do you remember what you experienced when you returned? What was the greatest blessing in that? Notice Joel 2:18-27.

The Relief That Follows Repentance (2:18-27)

Neal Pollard

While this book begins with the jolting warning of a looming judgment as a consequence of the nation’s sin then calls for genuine, heartfelt repentance, Joel gives some welcomed light at the end of the tunnel. There was no negotiating the need for repentance, nor avoiding the inevitability of the punishment. Yet, what would happen after the locusts and the army had been the instrument of such?  

God promises relief (18-20). The promises are seen throughout this paragraph, signified by what God “will” do (16 times in these ten verses). From cover to cover, the Bible assures us that the promises of God never fail. For a people besieged by the cost of their own unrighteousness, how welcomed this gracious reprieve had to be. This relief comes in the form of blessings; here, spiritual blessings like the Lord’s zeal and pity for them (18), material blessings like grain, wine, and oil (19), social and emotional blessings like no longer being a reproach among the nations (19), and physical blessings like punishing their punishers (20). We have even more today in Christ, knowing that leaving sin (Eph. 2:1-13) we have “all spiritual blessings” (Eph. 1:3). 

God urges trust (21-22). Twice, God calls to His people and says, “Do not fear.” The basis for their confidence and faith is what God will do. He has done great things, which He states generically (21) then specifically (22). Let’s consider the great things He has done for us, too numerous to count. Whenever we would waver in our faith, our confidence in Who’s above should outweigh our consternations within.

God calls for joy (21,23). In the midst of this reminder of His trustworthiness, He tells His people to “rejoice and be glad” (21). He repeats it again (23). Why? “For the Lord has done great things.” He points to the physical rains that had been withheld, refreshing their lands and their lives. Lush, fruitful fields would return. While the locust plague had literally stripped these things away, sin had brought its own barrenness. After repentance, there should be joy. There is a refreshing within that can be described with words like peace and protection (cf. Jer. 31:25; Acts 3:19; Phile. 20). 

God promises confidence (23-27). In light of the abundance they would receive from God’s hand (23-25), the people in the midst of their plenty would “praise the name of the Lord” and “never be put to shame” (26,27). They would know that God was with them and among them. What a difference it makes to know you stand on the rock-solid divine foundation (cf. Mat. 7:24-25; Isa. 28:16ff; 2 Tim. 2:19). 

Have you ever created a mess in your life through sin and felt the utter devastation of the consequences? Perhaps you experienced shame, loss, prolonged guilt, a feeling of worthlessness, fear, and anxiety. It was a ravaging experience. Then, you resolved to repent and turn away from it. No doubt, it did not happen immediately. Yet, eventually, you found relief, trust, joy, and confidence returned as you fully placed your life in God’s hands. What these people were promised is promised to us in a more complete way because we have Christ (John 14:6). 

Self

Gary Pollard

This week we’ll look at three more questions from the list:

Is there anything wrong with being selfish? 

Do we have an obligation to help others? 

If you rob from the rich to give to the poor is that wrong? 

  1. A selfish person cannot or will not prioritize the needs and desires of others over their own. They will do what they want regardless of its impact on others. From a naturalistic perspective, selfishness is beneficial for whoever has the responsibility of providing for their family — why not gain some kind of advantage to help the people you love? For believers, though, “You have to view yourself the same way Christ Jesus viewed himself: He was like God in every way, but he did not think that his being equal with God was something to use for his own benefit. Instead, he gave up everything, even his place with God. He accepted the role of a servant, appearing in human form. During his life as a man, he humbled himself by being fully obedient to God, even when that caused his death—death on a cross” (Phil 2.5-8). Jesus was selfless to the point of death, and that’s our standard. Therefore, it’s never morally acceptable to prioritize our own needs over others’ when we have an opportunity to help. 
  2. “We must not get tired of doing good things for others. We will receive our harvest of eternal life at the right time. We must not give up. When we have the opportunity to do something good for someone, we should do it. This is especially true for our family of believers” (Gal 6.9-10). Yes, we have an obligation to help others whenever we get the chance. The language in this text describes putting in some serious effort to do meaningful, beneficial things for others with priority going to our Christian family. Just as parents prioritize the well-being of their own children over the well-being of someone’s child on the other side of the world (because we have finite resources and cannot be in multiple places at once), believers prioritize the physical needs of their Christian family. If at all possible, we extend our effort and resources to help non-believers too! 
  3. Yes. Theft is always wrong (I Cor 6.10; Eph 4.28; Mk 10.19). James wrote to some believers who were facing the most extreme circumstances imaginable — they were being taken advantage of by wealthy “employers” who refused to pay their wages, and many of them died because of this (Js 5.4-5). Even in those horrifying conditions God’s expectation is, “Be patient, the Master will return. Hold on until then. Farmers have to be patient while their crops grow, waiting through the first and last rain before they can harvest. You must be patient too — never stop anticipating the Master’s return. Don’t complain against each other. If you always complain against each other, you will be judged guilty. And the Judge is ready to come!” (7-9). Our lives are so short that from our perspective the Master’s return is just a breath away. James encouraged the Christians who were poor and abused to hold on until their deaths because God would give them justice. He had much to say to the wealthy who were abusing them, specifically that their destiny would be horrifying. This is difficult for us to accept, but not if we actually believe that this life is nothing. 

But the government that rules us is in the heavens, and it is from there that we’re waiting for our rescuer, the Master Jesus Christ, to come. He will change our humble bodies and make them like his own glorious body. Christ can do this because of his power, the same power he can use to rule everything (Phil 3.20-21). 

Brothers and sisters, we want you to know about those who have died. We don’t want you to be sad like other people — the ones who have no hope. We believe that Jesus died, but we also believe that he came back to life. So we believe that God will raise to life through Jesus any who have died and bring them together with him when he returns. What we tell you now is the Master’s own message: Those of us who are still living when the Master comes again will join him, but not before those who have already died. The Master himself will come down from the sky with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet call of God. And the people who have died and were in Christ will come back to life first. After that, we who are still alive at that time will be gathered up with those who have died. We will be taken up in the clouds and meet the Master in the air. And we will be with him forever. You should encourage each other with these words (I Thess 4.13-18). 

Joel: JUDGMENT (I)

Do you believe this invasion is literally locusts, represents an army, or is both? Why do you believe as you do?

“The Day Of The Lord Is Near” (1:1-20)

Neal Pollard

No other book of the Bible is more wholly devoted to the subject of the day of the Lord than Joel. While the book’s most prominent appearance in the New Testament is not in the context of the final Judgment Day and is rather concerning the day in which the gospel is first preached, the book of Joel is written to its primary recipients about coming, divine judgment. Apparently, there is a locust plague which the prophet asserts as both the judgment of God and a sign of judgment to come. 

It is hard to date the book because there just aren’t any clear contextual clues to alert us to whether this is pre-exilic or post-exilic, if the northern kingdom has already suffered Assyrian Captivity, or the like. Those historic markers have no bearing on the message or interpretation of this short book. It is the theme that is central. The book centers around three ideas–judgment (1:1-2:11), repentance (2:12-17), and salvation (2:18-3:21; salvation for God’s people meant judgment for the nations around them). Chapter one focuses on the judgment which faces God’s people.

This judgment is unprecedented (1:1-4).Out of the starting gate, the prophet describes an event unlike any they or their forefathers had experienced (2). It would be one they would talk about for generations to come (3). The crux of this judgment, coming through natural disaster, is described graphically: “What the gnawing locust has left, the swarming locust has eaten; And what the swarming locust has left, the creeping locust has eaten; And what the creeping locust has left, the stripping locust has eaten” (4). 

These first few verses are considered Hebrew poetry, with verses three and four composed of three lines each. Duane Garrett asserts, “The heavy rhythm conveys a sense of being battered by successive waves of locusts, each one as bad as or worse than the previous” (NAC, 315). Joel likely is describing different stages of the locust and the final destruction brought by locusts hatched from eggs left by the earlier devourers. The point is that God brought this judgment and that it is unlike anything they had experienced. He will soon show that it is a response to the nation’s sin. 

This judgment is understandable (1:5). That there is a moral problem is demonstrated by the prophet’s address to the drunkards, apt symbols of national immorality as their vice depends on the successful growth of grapevines which the locusts would destroy. These creatures are being used to cut them off from their debauchery. They do not seem to be sorry for their sin, only that they are prevented from indulging in it. The farmers are the most directly impacted, but everyone in the land will suffer in the wake of this judgment. A call for repentance in the latter part of the chapter removes any doubt that this is merely a natural disaster. 

This judgment is unbearable (1:6-12) and upsetting (1:13-20). That fact is borne out by the description of invasion by this horde depicted as a nation described in frightening terms (6). It leaves nothing behind (7), but notice the reaction called for. “Wail like a virgin” (8), “be ashamed…wail” (11), “gird yourselves with sackcloth and lament” (13), “fast…and cry out to the Lord” (14,19). This judgment will effect man and beast (18,20). The judgment will be so comprehensive that the people will buckle under its weight and extensive impact. The impulse will be to plead, “To You, O Lord, I cry” (19). 

Something horrible is about to happen, and it is the result of judgment. It is Divine Judgment, coming with the omnipotence of God! Gone is “gladness and joy from the house of our God” (16). From the first word of the prophesy, Joel startles the reader with relentless descriptions of judgment. James Smith comments, “The prophet interpreted this disaster as an effort to move Israel to repentance. At the same time this plague was a harbinger of a worse judgment to come” (OT Survey Series, 61).  What the final day of judgment will be like will depend on whether or not we have made ready for it and what that judgment, for us, will be (Mat. 25:31-46). It can be a “bright day” or a “sad day.” If it is the latter, there will have been nothing before it in history to compare to the devastation of standing before the Lord unprepared for it. 

The Parable Of Two Debtors

What keeps us from realizing the true reality of our spiritual debt to God? Are we ever like Simon the leper?

Screenshot
Neal and Kathy Pollard

Neal Pollard

Why did Jesus speak in parables?  The disciples wondered just that (Matthew 13:10).  The Holy Spirit records four answers.  First, Jesus used parables because not all would receive the mysteries of the Kingdom by direct revelation (13:11).  Further, He did so because many hearts were dull and eyes and ears were closed (13:13-16).  Those with faith would accept His teaching, but unbelievers would not understand.  Then, He used parables because the prophets foretold that He would (13:34, 35).   Finally, He did because there were things hidden from the foundation of the world that He must reveal (13:35).

What relevance, then, do the parables have for the modern Bible reader?  Now, the parables exist as part of that written revelation.  Through them, one can see prophecy fulfilled.  The mystery that has been kept secret for long ages past (cf. Romans 16:25) can now be known.  Thus, the parables are of paramount importance as practical instruction today.

Jesus’ parables come out of many settings.  He spoke them during private talks with the disciples, in public sermons, and on the occasion of miracles and healings, but maybe the most effective parables were borne out of situations where His enemies tested him.  The parable in Luke 7:41-42 is such a one.  Consider four key words that aid one to better understand the so-called “Parable of Two Debtors.”

Content

The actual parable is two verses in length, as man has divided scripture.  Jesus expended a total of thirty Greek words (43—NIV; 40—KJV; 34—NAS).  The parable is filled with simple images that are easily comprehended.  He presents the characters, a moneylender and two debtors.  He presents the situation, that one owes about 500 days wages while another owes 50.  He presents the predicament, namely that neither had the ability to repay their debt.  He presents the lender’s response, who graciously forgives both of them.  He presents the debtors’ reactions, which is left for the hearers to interpret but is easily discerned.

Two men in debt needed help beyond their ability to resolve.  The lender is also the forgiver.  Jesus uses financial problems to illustrate spiritual problems.  How appropriate, since most people, regardless of time or geography, have suffered financial reverses.  One national survey found that seventy percent of all worries involve money (Collins, Christian Counseling, 531).  Suppose a person owed a single creditor $100,000 and the creditor called in the entire debt at once.  The debtor is unable to pay, and the creditor sends back news that the entire debt is totally expunged from the record.  How would that person feel toward the creditor, compared, say, with one who owed $1000 but whose debt was also forgiven.  The parable teaches the principle of greater debt, greater appreciation, and lesser debt, lesser appreciation.

Context

The setting of the parable gives it its meaning.  Jesus uses the parable to illustrate two very different people before His eyes.  Consider them.

The first person is a Pharisee named Simon.  One scholar points out that:

The Pharisees were the largest sect of the Jews.  They grew out of an older party, the Chasidim, the Pious ones, and became the “Separatists” of ancient times.  They took the name “Pharisee” probably during the rule of John Hyrcanus, BC 135-110.  They favored a narrow religio-political policy, in distinction to the Sadducees who wished to see the Jews a nation among the Nations (Robertson, na).

If the Jews labeled themselves “conservatives” and “liberals,” it could be commonly agreed that the Pharisees were the former and the Sadducees the latter.  While Jesus had no quarrel with their strict interpretation of the Law (cf. Matthew 23:3), He often rebuked their heart and attitude (Matthew 23:3-5).  Simon the Pharisee apparently had no glaring, outward sin problems, but was guilty in Luke seven of some severe heart problems.

The second person is a woman of the city and a known sinner.  Some have theorized that she was a prostitute, but nonetheless not likely to have been on Simon’s “A” List.  She brings an alabaster vial of perfume, a long neck bottle Jewish women wore as an accessory around the neck and broken when festive occasions called for its use.  Simon had invited Jesus for a meal, but she had “crashed” the party.  It took a lot of courage for her to come where she was obviously not welcome.

When Jews ate their meals at dinner parties, they would have reclined on low couches.  They leaned on their left arm with the head toward the table and the body stretched out away from it.  They removed their sandals before taking this position.  This is the way the woman would have found Jesus.  Her emotions seemingly overcome her and her tears fall on His feet.  She wiped His feet with her hair, which means she would have had to unbind her hair.  This was a social taboo for Jewish women.  By this point, one sees that she cared more about honoring Jesus than pleasing the crowd.  She performs a slave’s task, tending to His feet.

After the parable, Jesus asks a remarkable question:  “Do you see this woman?”  Obviously, Simon knew she was there, but he did not see her properly.  G. Campbell Morgan writes, “Simon could not see the woman as she then was, for looking at her as she had been.”  There are a lot of Simons in the world who refuse to let those who become Christians forget what they once were (cf. 1 Pet. 4:4).  Yet, the worst Simons can be in the church, refusing to let penitent, forgiven brothers and sisters forget their past.

The story ends with Jesus informing Simon that He had forgiven the woman’s sins.  In Matthew 9:3, when He forgave the paralytic’s sins, the scribes thought Jesus a blasphemer.  Yet, He does not gloss over the woman’s apparent immorality.  He calls them her “many sins” (Luke 7:47).  In this, He rebukes Simon for “loving little” and implies that He stood unforgiven.

Contrast

One owed much and one owed less. Both of them, however, are sinners and are in a greater debt than they can repay.  Such has always been the case, as it is today (cf. Ecclesiastes 7:10; Romans 3:10,23; 1 John 5:19).  Yet, the difference between the two debts is obvious.

One was forgiven much and one was forgiven less. The word “forgave” (Luke 7:42) is different from “forgiven” in verse forty-eight.  “Forgave” (7:42) is from the same word family as the word translated “grace” throughout the New Testament.  The word “forgiven” means “let go” or “release,” and when used in legal terms meant to be freed from an office, marriage, debt or obligation.  The forgiveness Jesus offered was an act rather than a nebulous concept.  It was a conditional gift she could enjoy eternally.  She sought forgiveness, while Simon did not.  She received it, but he did not.

One was humble and one was proud. Jesus praises the sinner and condemns the religious leader.  Why?  In a word, “Attitude.”  The parable in Luke eighteen illustrates this well, verse fourteen pronouncing the sinful tax collector justified and the pompous Pharisee not justified.  Jesus saw great potential in a “Big S” sinner who knew it than in a “little s” sinner who did not.

One loved much and one loved little. Jesus implies this in the parable and makes Simon explicitly admit it.  The natural response of every forgiven person should be “much love” (cf. 1 John 4:19).

Conclusions

Consider some practical lessons one can glean from that parable for today.

No one is worthy of forgiveness. Both debtors in the parable did nothing to merit forgiveness.  No one today is worthy (cf. Titus 3:5).  To understand God’s grace, one must see himself as a sinner in need of it.

Not all sinners grasp the seriousness of their sinfulness. Simon was no less a sinner, but he acted like he was.  Likewise, some of the hardest people to win to Christ are good, moral, but unsaved people (cf. Matthew 7:21-23).

No one can repay his debt. Not just the two fictional characters in the parable.  Not just Simon and the woman.  Everybody needs Jesus (Micah 6:7).

Sins of attitude are as deadly as sins of action. Ask the elder brother in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15).  Among the lusts of the flesh, wherein is listed murder, adultery, and fornication, one also finds outbursts of anger, disputes, and envy.  Sins of attitude will keep one out of heaven as surely as will sins of action (cf. Romans 6:23).

Jesus freely forgives those who seek it. That is the good news and bottom line of this parable.  Jesus’ forgiveness is available to everyone (Titus 2:11; 1 Timothy 2:6).  Yet, one must seek it like the sinful woman did!

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (XIV)

How is God’s expectation of repentance in Hosea’s day parallel to our day?

“Return” (14:1-9)

Neal Pollard

God ends His message through Hosea with a plan for Israel’s repentance. It is thorough and thoughtful. It is pointed, but pleading. God can perfectly foresee the collision course with spiritual disaster that this nation is on, and He wants them to feel the urgency of their situation. The postscript at the end of the book (9) calls on the wise, understanding, and discerning person to know and do. 

The Lord begins with what the people must do (1-3).  In a word, they must “return.” In this, they must acknowledge that they have gone astray (“you have stumbled…”)(1). Their repentance and returning would be articulated with words (2-3). With humility and honesty, they must confess to God how they had betrayed Him. 

The Lord promises what He will do (4-8). Notice that God looks to the future and uses the word “will” 12 times in these last six verses. If they genuinely return to Him, He is anxious and ready to heal and love them. But, more than that, God focuses them on what their return would do for them. Every other occurrence of the word “will” speaks of the abundance and blessings that would follow Israel’s restoration. It would be apparent to others that God was blessing these penitent people. 

The Lord appeals to what He expects and why (9). He expects people to evaluate their spiritual situation and make the right decision. He expects that every accountable one could do that and, in wisdom, would do that. He expects them to do that because His ways are right and “the righteous will walk in them, but transgressors will stumble in them.”

Consider that our situation parallels what God says to Israel through Hosea in this chapter. Through Christ, He has told us what we must do (Luke 3:10,12,14; Acts 2:37ff; Acts 16:30). Think about the multitude of promises that flow out of our obedient, penitent response to His will (Js. 1:17). He tells us what He expects and why (6:6; Dt. 10:12; Mic. 6:8). The question is, will we be wise, understanding, and discerning? Will we appreciate the protective love of our spiritual groom and His reasonable expectations that we be faithful to Him?

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (XIII)

As you read chapter 13, think about how the prophet talks about death and life? How do you think verse 14 relates to 1 Corinthians 15?

From Death To Life (13:1-16)

Neal Pollard

Before a final appeal to Israel in chapter 14, God makes closing arguments in testifying against the nation’s unfaithfulness. If this was a legal proceeding, He would be the omniscient witness, prosecutor, and jury, and the omnipotent judge. Yet, having such power, He also has the total restraint inherent in an absolutely flawless character. He does not simply annihilate. He pleads. Yet, it is an open and shut case (see 4:1; 12:2).

God sentences the northern kingdom to the death penalty. When you read of Ephraim, Israel, and Samaria in this chapter, these are all distinct identifiers of the tribes that broke away from Judah (1 Kings 12). Ephraim is the largest tribe and thereby represents all the people of the kingdom. Israel is spoken of here as the name of the northern kingdom. Samaria is the capital.

  • This chapter reveals how death occurred for them (1). They exalted themselves and turned to Baal. 
  • This chapter reveals what death looked like (2-3). They sinned more and more and wantonly longed for idolatry. Yet, they would disappear like the morning cloud, the dew, chaff blown in the wind, and smoke out of a chimney. 
  • This chapter reveals why death was tragic (4-6). They had rejected their Savior from the beginning, who had cared for them and provided for them. Blessed by Him, they became satisfied, proud, and forgot Him.
  • This chapter reveals how death would come (7-8). He would appear and attack like a predator–lion, leopard, bear, and lioness. It would be both a planned attack but also an attack from one who acts with just cause.
  • This chapter reveals what death meant for them (9-13). It was destruction when help was available (9). It meant vulnerability when a king was possible (10-11). It meant bondage when freedom was attainable (12). It meant desolation (13).

While physical and spiritual death loomed for Israel, there was still a future restoration for some of God’s people. It would not be the northern kingdom, but for those who sought refuge in Judah by faith in God’s message. But there was an ultimate hope and life for those who were faithful to God. Thus, Paul takes Hosea’s words in verse 14 and applies it to our hope in the resurrection because of Christ. He quotes the verse in 1 Corinthians 15:55-57, saying, “O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting? The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law; but thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Israel did not have the purity or trust of heart to turn to Him, but even in this gloomy and impending doom, God shows the hope that is always possible for those who come to Him for life (John 5:40). 

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (XII)

How does Jacob’s character compare and contrast with Hosea’s audience in Hosea 12? Open your Bible to this chapter and let’s look closer.

A Word To Jacob (12:1-14)

Neal Pollard

Hosea appeals to the family history of Israel, the name given to Jacob by God in Genesis 32:28 after He contended with Him. The prophet appeals to certain troublesome attributes of the patriarch’s character as symbolic of the sin problems of his contemporaries to whom he writes (2). He refers to Jacob’s treachery against Esau from the womb and his contending against God as a man (3). While these liabilities did not debilitate Jacob’s faith, his descendants, the nation, expressed the worst of these traits in their lives. 

Hosea appeals to how their father Jacob wept and sought God’s favor. He turned away from sin and immorality and turned to “the Lord, the God of hosts” (5). The nation had done the opposite. They went from faithfulness in their earlier days to the scheming and fighting against God of their unrighteous present. They multiplied lies and violence (1). They made alliances with the pagan nations (1). They were dishonest and oppressing (7). They trusted in wealth above all else (8). Because their hearts were not turned to God like Jacob’s was, they are worthless and their worship is, too (11). He has provoked God to bitter anger, and He will punish him for his reproach (14).

Despite their unfaithfulness, look at God’s steadfastness toward these descendants of His beloved patriarch. He appeals to them to return to Him, conform to His ethics, and wait continually for Him (6). He has been their God through thick and thin, from the beginning (9). He sent them abundant revelation through prophets, visions, and parables (10). But they fell back upon their baser nature. Therefore, God will allow them to go their own way and suffer the consequences of such.

In the spirit of Romans 15:4 and 1 Corinthians 10:6,11, what should we take from this admonition? Think back to the beginning of our Christian walk. We turned away from the deficiencies and destitutions of our soul and character and called out to Him (Acts 22:16). Where are we now? Are we building on that faithfulness (Heb. 10:32-39) or are we reverting to the “old man” ways (Eph. 4:17-22)? If we turn away from Him, it pains Him. But He will allow us to go whatever way we desire (cf. Acts 14:16). Yet, let there be no doubt, He desires us to return to Him (cf. 2 Pet. 3:9). 

Committed Like Peter

Which New Testament disciple do you most relate to? What aspect of Peter’s life resonates most with you?

Carl Pollard

I want to be bold, but sometimes I’m afraid. Big decisions can be intimidating. I aspire to be committed, yet I often back down even when I know I shouldn’t. I want to please people, but at times I let them down. Occasionally, I fail God. That is why Peter deeply resonates with me.

Many people relate to Peter because, as humans, we constantly fall short. However, scripture provides us with examples to reflect upon, and there is no better example than Peter. He faced failures, yet he grew from them.

Eugene Peterson once said, “Among the apostles, the one absolutely stunning success was Judas, and the one thoroughly groveling failure was Peter. Judas was a success in the ways that most impress us: he was successful both financially and politically. He cleverly arranged to control the money of the apostolic band and skillfully manipulated the political forces of the day to accomplish his goals. In contrast, Peter was a failure in ways that we most dread: he was impotent in a crisis and socially inept. At the arrest of Jesus, he collapsed—a hapless, blustering coward. In the most critical situations of his life with Jesus, such as the confession on the road to Caesarea Philippi and the vision on the Mount of Transfiguration, he often said embarrassingly inappropriate things. He was not the companion we would want in times of danger nor the person we would feel comfortable with at a social gathering. Yet time has reversed our judgments on the two men. Judas is now a byword for betrayal, while Peter is one of the most honored names in the Church and the world. Judas is a villain, and Peter is a saint. However, the world continues to chase after the successes of Judas—financial wealth and political power—while defending itself against the failures of Peter—impotence and ineptness” (quoted in Tim Kimmel, Little House on the Freeway, 191-192).

When we examine Peter, we see a committed follower of Christ. Though he stumbled often, he remained dedicated to Jesus. He abandoned his home and career to follow Him, making his life a full-time service to Christ. Many Christians today attempt to separate their spiritual lives from their “real” lives, often settling for just a piece of Jesus. In contrast, Peter desired for Christ to be his entire life.

In John 13:6-9, we read: “So He came to Simon Peter. He said to him, ‘Lord, do You wash my feet?’ Jesus answered and said to him, ‘What I do you do not realize now, but you will understand hereafter.’ Peter said to Him, ‘Never shall You wash my feet!’ Jesus answered him, ‘If I do not wash you, you have no part with Me.’ Simon Peter said to Him, ‘Lord, then wash not only my feet, but also my hands and my head.’”

Peter longed for his life to be filled with Christ. Pliny the Elder, a Roman writer from the same era as Jesus, recounted a story about the erection of an obelisk that would stand 99 feet tall. Twenty thousand workers were chosen to pull on the ropes and activate the hoisting apparatus. The operation was fraught with responsibility and risk; one mistake could cause the obelisk to fall, ruining years of effort. The King demanded that the engineer focus entirely on the task, so he ordered the engineer’s own son to be strapped to the apex of the obelisk, ensuring that both his heart and mind were committed to the task.

On an even larger scale, our commitment to Christ affects thousands, perhaps even millions of people. Their souls are in the balance, and a half-hearted Christian walk does not honor that responsibility. How do we feel about Christ? Do we merely want a piece of Him on Sundays, or do we desire for Him to be immersed in every aspect of our lives?

“It is not what men eat but what they digest that makes them strong; not what we gain but what we save that makes us rich; not what we read but what we remember that makes us learned; not what we preach but what we practice that makes us Christians.”

Peter was far from a shallow disciple; he genuinely sought Christ in his life. As he said, “Behold, we have left everything and followed You” (Mark 10:28).

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (XI)

How does God feel about us when we refuse to be faithful to Him?

How Can I Give You Up? How Can I Surrender You? (11:1-12)

Neal Pollard

Israel and Judah have betrayed God and given Him up for far inferior and worse alternatives. Their wanton pursuit of such love interests was met by violence and mistreatment from their misguided choice. What utter folly in exchanging the perfect, providing, and protecting God for the perverse, pitiless, and pompous world and its idols!

Despite their resolute determination to forsake Him, God’s perfect love cannot be extinguished. That does not mean He will change His mind about their judgment and punishment, but He does not do so with out of control rage and jealousy. He does so, as it were, with audible weeping and restraint. These are His people, and He loves them so much. 

He recalls the love He had for the nation at its beginning, when He led them out of Egypt (1). He calls Israel His son, the very way He refers to the nation to Moses (Ex. 4:22). The ultimate fulfillment of this prophecy, according to Matthew, is when Joseph and Mary take Jesus from hiding in Egypt to settle in Nazareth (Matt. 2:15,19-23). In the context, though, God is recalling the beginning of their relationship. Yet, in such recall, He remembers how their idolatry and unfaithfulness started even back in this formative stage (2). While God was teaching them to walk, taking them in His arms, leading them with bonds of love, lightening their burdens, bending over and feeding them, they refused to return to Him (3-5). For that reason, God says, they will return not to Egypt but instead go to Assyria (5). 

He will allow them to have the consequences of their own choice. They will experience the sword of the notoriously cruel Assyrians (6). Their property and bodies will be demolished (6). Why? Because they turned from Him and none exalted Him (7). Despite how God felt about Israel, He would not make them love Him and be faithful to Him. He allows us to go the way we prefer to go, even if it is disastrous for us. 

But do not miss the heart of God! It is vividly depicted in the last five verses. He says, “My heart is torn within me, and my compassion overflows” (8b, NLT). This is why He cries out to the nation, “How can I give you up…How can I surrender you…How can I make you like Admah…treat you like Zeboiim?” (8). The cities mentioned here are the lesser known towns in the Valley of Zoar that were destroyed with the better known dens of wickedness, Sodom and Gomorrah (Deut. 29:23). He will not execute His fierce anger or come in wrath (9). He speaks of a future where they would return to Him and resettle (11), even as they were presently walking in treachery before a God who is faithful (11b). This reminds me of something Paul will say later about the steadfast character of God: “For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us; If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself” (2 Tim. 2:11-13; cf. Rom. 3:3).

He desires our faithful devotion (see Hos. 4:1). But even when we refuse to come to Him, He loathes to let us go. If we persist, He will do so. Yet, He does so not with gritting teeth or clinched hand. He does so with weeping and wailing, devastated at the very loss. 

Human Value

How does one argue human value without the existence of God?

Gary Pollard

“What makes human life valuable?” 

A purely naturalistic answer is not adequate. Life begets life, which is true. Self-preservation is built into our programming, that’s true. Life is valuable because of its potential to contribute to future generations (the reproductive success aspect of biological imperatives), which is also true. Humans rely on each other for survival, that’s true. We have a unique capacity for empathy, true. We have consciousness and recognize the value of others, true (kinda). And there are cultural narratives that emphasize the value of human life (depends on the cultural narrative). 

But what stops a society from devolving into the practice of eugenics? If some have superior genetics in the mental and physical health department, why not be more selective about who gets to reproduce? Why would we allow the survival of those who don’t or can’t contribute to future generations? Why would we allow/desire the survival of those who don’t or can’t meaningfully contribute to society? What about empathy’s subjective nature? We don’t usually show empathy (as much anyways) to those whose experiences or values are very different from our own, not without a transcendent directive that calls us to aim higher than self. We have consciousness and recognize the value of others…until we decide that they aren’t valuable any longer (see all militant religious conflicts over the last fifteen centuries). And those cultural narratives that value human life are primarily religious in their nature, with none emphasizing absolute selfless love more than Christianity. By Christianity, of course, I mean actual Christians. Not godless pagans who use iconography and distorted narratives to manipulate others for personal elevation. They are not — and cannot by definition be — Christians. 

So what does make human life valuable? We have to posit their value from a transcendent point of view. 

  1. We are the only life on the planet that looks like God (Gen 1.27). While there’s been much debate over what “in his image and likeness” means, it’s not exactly ambiguous in scripture. Genesis 5.1 and 5.3 make the best case for this: “When God created people, he made them like himself.” And, “After Adam was 130 years old, he had another son who looked just like himself. Adam named his son Seth.” Same exact wording. Genesis 9.6 says, “God made humans to be like himself. So whoever kills a person must be killed by another person.” The value of human life comes from our resemblance to the Creator. 
  2. As Jesus affirmed, the two most important laws are to love God with all of our being and to love other people like self (cf. Mt 22.36-40). If we love God, we’re going to love other people — including people who hate and hurt us (Mt 5.44). That isn’t a natural reaction to hostility! Human life has value because God gave it value. 
  3. Human life is valuable because the Creator sacrificed himself to give us life. If God “Doesn’t want anyone to be destroyed, but for everyone to change their lives,” our view of people should be the same (cf. II Pt 3.9). 
  4. From a naturalistic point of view, there’s no utility in ensuring the survival of people who can’t contribute to society. Drawing from the reasons we’ve listed James says, “Pure, genuine religion is this: providing for orphans and widows who need help and keeping yourself free from the world’s evil influence” (1.27). 

Think about what we have in Christ: the encouragement he has brought us, the comfort of his love, our sharing in his spirit, and the mercy and kindness he has shown us. If you enjoy these blessings, then do what will make my joy complete: Agree with each other, and show your love for each other. Be united in your goals and in the way you think. In whatever you do, don’t let selfishness or pride be your guide. Be humble, and honor others more than yourselves. Don’t be interested only in your own life, but care about the lives of others too (Phil 2.1-4). 

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (X)

What is your biggest impression about Hosea up to this point?

A Charge, A Complaint, And A Call (10:1-15)

Neal Pollard

The unfaithfulness of the people is further highlighted by a metaphor of a vineyard (1-4), a picture of their idolatrous worship (5-8), a description of their guilt (9-11), and a command to repent (12-15). Much like the previous chapter, Hosea writes about how the people had thoroughly forsaken the God who blessed them for the influences of the world around them. God is heartbroken, but He is also omnisciently aware of how they forsook Him to His face. Notice the content of the chapter.

The Charge (1-8). At the top of the list is ingratitude (1). The more their fruit and the richer their land, the more steeped in pagan practices the became. Why? Their heart is faithless (2). They are also charged with misplaced confidence, ignoring God but saddled with a weak and helpless king (3). They are charged with empty oaths (4). They are devoted to their worthless idols and they pour out their hearts to them (5). Their mourning would turn to shame and sorrow when, only too late, they realize the consequences of their sin as it causes their captivity (6-8). In fact, they would be horrified. Everything they relied on would not only fail them, but they would be destroyed alongside them. They would beg for the hills and mountains to fall on them and cover them (8). 

The Complaint (9-11). God looks back (9) and sees a pattern of apostasy that goes back at least as far as the Period of the Judges. Gibeah, mentioned first in 5:8 and again in 9:9, is associated with some of the “deepest depravity” anyone, much less God’s people, ever committed (see Judges 19-20).  Duane Garrett also associates it with Saul’s military fortress, a king more devoted to the military than to the Lord (NAC, 214). They will be overtaken in this infamous city. He says they bear “double guilt” (10). He says they are a trained heifer that loves to thresh (11), and God will allow them to do so in the yoke of captivity and punishment (11b). They were a fruitful vine, but yielded only poisonous fruit. They were an industrious heifer, but threshed that unfit produce. God’s patience with such hardhearted rebellion was exhausted. 

The Call (12-15). Yet, He does not simply throw up His hands at this point. He renews His plea to this stubborn people. Staying with the farming analogy, He calls for them to sow righteousness, reap kindness, break up their fallow ground (be genuinely penitent, not just on the surface), seek the Lord, and wait for the rain of righteousness (12). Yet, their misplaced trust and malevolent decisions (13-14) had them on course for tumult, destruction, and being cut off. 

God’s anger seems hot and His judgments pointed. If there is any question about whether He is moved only by wrath and not also unrequited love, keep reading. The next chapter will prove His steadfast love, even in the face of all of this. How tragic that Israel refused to see it. As tragic is when the world (1 Tim. 2:4-5) or I (Heb. 2:3) refuse to see such love and respond in faithful obedience! 

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (IX)

When God Lets Go (9:1-17)

Neal Pollard

If we wonder why God chose to use a harlot like Gomer to represent Israel, all we need to do is read the inspired indictment in chapter nine. Again using Ephraim, the largest tribe, to represent the northern kingdom, God lays out the unfaithfulness of His people in the multitudinous ways they were guilty. In verse one, he explicitly accuses Israel, saying, “For you have played the harlot, forsaking your God. You have loved harlots’ earnings…” (1). What spiritual toll would this take on the nation?

They would starve (1b-2). They had given Baal credit for their harvests (2:8-9), but their anticipated harvests would not come. There would be no wheat or wine! God would withhold those material provisions. 

They would go into captivity (3,6). This actually expressed in multiple ways in this chapter. First, explicitly, Hosea says they would not remain in “the Lord’s land” (3). They would return to “Egypt” (a figurative way to describe the bondage of captivity, 3), which Hosea makes parallel to Assyria (3b). He says, “they will go” (6) and again symbolically mentions Egypt and Memphis (a famous cemetery in Egypt, Robert Chisholm, BKC, 1399) to show how they would die in this frightening process (6). It is described as “punishment” and “retribution” (7). Finally, he says God “will cast them away” and “they will be wanderers among the nations” (17). 

Their worship would be rejected (4-5). Hosea mentions drink offerings, sacrifices, bread, appointed festivals, and feast days, central to Old Testament worship. These won’t please Him and He will not allow them to enter His house. God stands at the door of the temple and stops His people from coming in and trying to worship Him. Can you imagine?

Their spiritual leaders would be powerless to help them (7-9). These seem to be true prophets and divinely-inspired men, driven mad by the grossness of their iniquity and the greatness of their hostility (7). They are full of depravity, iniquity, and sins, and faithful messengers, like Isaiah, Joel, Amos, Micah, Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, and others, had been warning them to repent and return to God. But they were so far gone in their wickedness that they rendered themselves incapable of restoration. It can happen (2 Pet. 2:14). 

They would be unfruitful, barren, and bereaved of children (10-14,16). Much of the latter half of this chapter is devoted to how costly the people’s sins would be on their descendants. While they would not bear the guilt of their parents’ sins (Ezek. 18:20), they would bear the consequences of them. The fortunate ones would be those not born (11,14) and not delivered (16). They would be bereaved–childless (12). If righteousness strengthens a home, sin certainly destroys it. 

They would be unloved and rejected by God (15,17). Go back and review these first five consequences of Israel’s unfaithfulness. They are sobering in the extreme! Yet, add this last one to it and it becomes absolutely unfathomable! What is worse than having God declare, “I came to hate them” (15), “I will love them no more” (15), and that He will cast them away (17). A penitent David, heartbroken by his sin, pleaded, “Cast me not away from Your presence, O Lord” (Psa. 51:11). Yet, that is exactly what God is doing to Israel.

Like Hosea, God tried to bring His bride back and give her another chance. In fact, He had given her countless chances over the centuries. But she was devoted to deviance and intent on iniquity. Now, God pledges that He is letting go. He will not fight for her affection anymore. Let us not ignore the fact that God does not want to do this, but if we refuse His overtures we should understand that He will! 

What To Say To God When You’re In Trouble

Neal Pollard

Have you ever found yourself in over your head, when you had to ask for help? We never like to get to that point, financially, emotionally, physically, or spiritually. But, unless we callous our hearts to the truth, we need God constantly–especially spiritually. In Psalm 38, David comes before the Lord pleading with Him to help in a dire situation. While it involves the opposition of earthly enemies (12,19), the main concern is his own opposition to God’s will. The main problem on David’s mind is his sin problem. David gives us an example of how to pray to God in time of trouble, especially the self-induced kind. 

ACKNOWLEDGE HOW YOUR SIN MAKES HIM FEEL (1-3)

David knows that God hates sin and is displeased by its presence in our lives. Meaningful repentance and change is not possible until we can see our sin through His perfect eyes. This honest assessment will keep us from being defensive or from rationalizing.

SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE SERIOUSNESS OF YOUR SIN (4-8)

Look at all the descriptive terms and synonyms David uses regarding his sin. His “iniquities” are heavy burdens, foul and festering wounds, that which causes him to be bent over and bowed down, the cause of constant mourning, a debilitating sickness, and a numbing, crushing, agitating thing. See your sin that way and there is no way to hang onto it, much less embrace and defend it. 

CONFESS YOUR INABILITY TO RESOLVE THIS ALONE (9-14)

Pride is such a destructive thing! David shows no sign of it in this psalm. He feels isolated from friends and tormented by foes. He feels incapable of solving this problem himself. Resolution must be preceded by recognition of how daunting our circumstance is without God. 

TELL GOD OF YOUR HOPE THAT HE WILL HELP YOU (15-22) 

The state of mind David has expressed inevitably leads to divine dependency. He hopes in God. He’s confident that God will answer him. Though he knows he’s close to falling, he pleads with God to intercede. His final plea as he speaks to God? “Make haste to help me, O Lord, my salvation.” 

We must resist the devil and our own fleshly desires. God has equipped us with the ability to be disciplined and to deny self. But, the battle cannot be won without leaning on the Everlasting Arms. Don’t just know that. Express it to God daily, throughout the day. It will help you see your problems more clearly and to see God as the solution. 

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (VIII)

Reaping The Whirlwind (8:1-14)

Neal Pollard

Hosea calls for a trumpet to sound, an action that symbolizes judgment and warning in both the Old and New Testaments (Ex. 20:18; Jud. 6:34; Hos. 5:8; 1 Cor. 15:52; 1 Th. 4:16). An enemy will come against Israel because of transgression and rebellion (1). While the whole chapter will specifically address what that sin was, Hosea describes the whole matter in verse seven. This is one of the best-known passages from the book, where the prophet writes of Israel, “For they sow the wind And they reap the whirlwind.” What was the iniquity they sowed?

Lip service (2-3). It is an act of desperation, in view of impending doom. They cry out, “My God, we of Israel know You!” (2). They not only confess Him, but they appeal to their identity as Israel. However, “Israel” has rejected the good. How well this illustrates the condemnation Christ would later make of their descendants, quoting Isaiah  29:13, “This people honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far away from Me” (Mat. 15:8). Jesus calls this hypocrisy, and so it was for Israel! We sow to the wind when our devotion is no more than skin deep. 

Failure to consult God (4-6). This was true of their earthly rulers, their kings and princes (4). This was true of their idols (4). Verses five and six make a difficult text, and the wording is confusing. It seems that Hosea is referring to the calf set up by Jeroboam (1 Ki. 12:28-29; cf. Hos. 10:5-6). God is outraged at Israel’s guilt and immorality. They pay homage to a calf idol and ignore Him. That calf would be broken in pieces (6), and the people who worship it would be “cut off” (4). We sow to the wind when we fail to keep God in the only place He will accept (Mat. 6:24,33; Ex. 20:3; Js. 4:4). 

Political folly (8-10).  The same issues the prophet Isaiah repeatedly addressed, trusting in earthly alliances rather than submitting to the authority and power of God, are highlighted by Hosea. “They hire allies among the nations” (10), but they would have the respect of no one (8). Like a donkey, stubborn and resistant to rule, they turn to man instead of God. Their foolish choice of lovers and protectors would cause them to diminish and be of no delight. We sow to the wind when we put our trust in man and refuse to submit to the Lordship of the only Master who can save and deliver us (Prov. 3:5; Isa. 36:4). 

Empty rituals (11-13). Like the first offense mentioned in this chapter (lip service), this is a matter of a people more than willing to worship but unwilling to know and practice His Word. They regarded the many precepts of His law as a strange thing, but they kept on coming to worship and going through the motions anyway (12). Yet, as Hosea has already told them, “I delight in loyalty rather than sacrifice, and in the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings” (6:6). Because of this, God will cause them to go into “Egypt” (13; this must be symbolic given the timeframe, standing for exile and captivity. They are going to Assyria (7:11). We sow to the wind when we refuse to repent of the sin of our daily lives, but insist on continuing to offer worship. 

Self-reliance (14). The condemning, closing indictment is succinctly put: “Israel has forgotten his Maker.”  They built their palaces and fortified cities with no thoughts of God. But God vows to set those dwellings on fire. How God had warned them against self-reliance from the time of the giving of the Law! “Beware that you do not forget the Lord your God by not keeping His commandments and His ordinances and His statutes which I am commanding you today; otherwise, when you have eaten and are satisfied, and have built good houses and lived in them, and when your herds and your flocks multiply, and your silver and gold multiply, and all that you have multiplies, then your heart will become proud and you will forget the Lord your God who brought you out from the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery” (Deut. 8:11-14). He warned that the danger would be to say, “My power and the strength of my hand made me this wealth” (Deut. 8:17b). So it was in Hosea’s day. So it usually is in every generation. We sow to the wind when we trust in our income, our wisdom, and our strength, forgetting the God who gives every good and perfect gift (Js. 1:17). God reminds us “that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble” chosen by God (1 Cor. 1:26-27a). When self is too strong and sufficient, we buy into the illusion that we have provided everything for ourselves. The rich farmer shows us how poorly that ends (Luke 12:20)! 

Hosea: Unfaithfulness (VII)

A Physician Desiring To Heal, But A Patient Who Refuses Treatment (7:1-16)

Neal Pollard

While God changes the metaphor to describe His relationship with the northern kingdom, from husband and wife to doctor and patient, the unfaithfulness of Israel is a continued theme. Hosea’s words are addressed to Ephraim, again chosen to represent the whole nation due to its place as largest tribe. The diagnosis is extremely critical, and the outlook is grim. Yet, in the midst of the warnings, one still sees a hurt God who reels with the feelings of rejection. Hosea bemoans her refusal to return to God (10). God cries, “They have strayed from Me!” (13). He says, “I would redeem them, but they speak lies against Me” (13). “They do not cry to Me from their heart when they wail on their beds” (14). “They turn away from Me” (14). For all He did for them, they plotted evil against Him (15). Yes, He is angry, but He also is filled with profound hurt at being rejected by His people. 

When you get a physical and blood is drawn and tests are administered, you get a report that indicates your overall health picture, including blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, etc. Those statistics help measure your health (or lack thereof). Notice the spiritual health report from this divinely-administered checkup.

  • They were deceivers (1).
  • They were deluding themselves (2,11). 
  • They were delighted in sin (3). 
  • They were disloyal to their spouses (4) and their God (10).
  • They were drunkards (5).
  • They were deranged by sinful anger (6-7).
  • They were devoured by strangers, but didn’t know it (9).
  • They were devising evil against God (12-16).

God’s diagnosis is blunt and sobering. He calls her “a cake not turned” (8), “a silly dove, without sense” (11), and “a deceitful bow” (16). They turn, but not toward God (16). He could heal them and make all things whole for them, but they refuse to turn to them even as their self-inflicted suffering is at its worst. God sees them as beyond hope, though He continues to love them and long for their return.

I wonder how often this expresses God’s feelings for congregations and individual Christians, His covenant people with whom He is in a special relationship with. How often does He see one, racked by sin and self-inflicted hurts, looking anywhere and everywhere but up to the only source of healing and hope? Does He see a relentless pursuit of the world and worldly answers despite His desire to be the remedy for all that ails us? More pointedly, I ask that about me. Am I spiritually sick, but so self-centered that I refuse to turn to Him? Hosea’s message should be taken very personally! When it is, it helps me see how much God loves me and hates my sin and what it does to me.