A Non-Religious View Of Alcohol

Dale Pollard

Not all kids will be killed or harmed in an alcohol related incident, but many are. Not all marriages will be destroyed by alcohol-fueled abuse, but many have been. Not every crime that’s committed will somehow involve alcohol, but many do. As a preacher, I don’t need the Bible to help me formulate my opinion on alcohol. Nobody does. While the Bible has a lot to say about a lot of things, one doesn’t need to crack open The Good Book to find out whether or not alcohol will improve lives— or make lives worse. Consider the following statistics pulled from non-religious and globally respected sources.

This is the reality. 

Youth And Alcohol Don’t Mix 

People ages 12 to 20 drink 3.4% of all alcohol consumed in the United States. Although youth drink less often than adults, when they do drink, they drink more. More than 90% of all alcohol drinks consumed by youth are consumed through binge drinking

In 2021, 5.9 million youth ages 12 to 20 reported drinking alcohol beyond “just a few sips” in the past month.

In 2021, approximately 613,000 youth ages 12 to 20 reported binge drinking on 5 or more days over the past month. 

What could possibly go wrong? 

The possibilities are endless, and none of them are good. Problems related to underage drinking include trouble in school, unsafe sexual behavior, drinking and driving, aggressive or violent behavior, and trouble with the law. 

It Could Kill Them: Alcohol is a major factor in the deaths of people younger than 21 in the US each year. This includes deaths from car crashes, homicides, alcohol overdoses, falls, burns, drowning, and suicides. 

It Could Harm Them: In 2011 alone, about 188,000 underage drinkers found themselves in the emergency room for alcohol-related injuries. 

It Could Permanently Damage Them: Underage drinking leads to a higher risk of alcohol use disorder (AUD) later in life. Adults 26 and older who started drinking before age 15 are 3.5 times more likely to report having AUD in just the past year. 

Source: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 

Alcohol And Marriage Don’t Mix 

Two-thirds of victims of spousal abuse report that the perpetrator had been drinking at the time of the incident(s). This doesn’t just apply to the United States. Global studies show higher odds of domestic abuse if one or both partners are dependent on alcohol. 

Around 50% of marriages end in divorce. When alcohol abuse is present in a household, the chances of divorce nearly triple

Source: Alcohol Rehab Guide (Apr. 20, 2023) 

Alcohol And Crime Don’t Mix 

Excessive drinking has the ability to lower inhibitions, impair a person’s judgement and increase the risk of aggressive behaviors. Because of this, alcohol-related violence and crime rates are on the rise throughout the country. 

Alcohol is a leading cause of traffic fatalities. Drinking and driving kills 28 people a day in the U.S. — about one person every 52 minutes — according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). That’s more than 10,000 lives lost each year to drunk driving. 

Add. Source: National Institutes of Health (Mar 16,2023) 

These statistics speak for themselves. We should be careful as Christians what we say about alcohol consumption because it’s taken a lot from countless people. It’s taken health, wealth, children, spouses, and ruined otherwise bright futures. Alcohol simply costs far too much to fool with– and that’s not up for debate. 

Seeking Peace Amidst Conflict: Lessons From History and Scripture

Brent Pollard

Reading comments on social media posts is bound to irritate you, like an eyelash that has gotten into your eye. People frequently share the most repulsive thoughts hidden in their hearts on the internet because of the relative anonymity it provides. I have seen the same confirmed regarding the recent Hamas-led assault against Israel. People are trying to gloss over the actions of terrorists by equating them to the alleged occupation of Jews in the region since the creation of the nation-state of Israel in 1948. 

This defense of terrorism is an equivocation. Though the creation of the Israel nation-state indeed allowed many Jews of the diaspora to return, it is naive to believe that no Jews lived in the region before May 1948. Indeed, records show that at least 600,000 Jews lived in Jerusalem before David Ben Gurion became Israel’s first Prime Minister. There were even enough Jews present in 1909 to create the city of Tel Aviv as a suburb of the Arabic city of Jaffa (Joppa). Thus, framing this argument in terms of colonialism or imperialism or accusing Israelis of perpetuating apartheid against Palestinians is a ridiculous attempt by the enemies of Western culture to validate their radical, often violent ideology.

As a Christian and an earthly citizen of the United States, it would be easy for me to sit back and watch things play out on the evening news. I can close my eyes and say that this does not concern me, even though the United States has previously been subject to jihadi attacks. But I am only fooling myself. I saw the pro-Palestinian protesters in New York City and other metropolitan areas brandishing Nazi swastikas and using the “Free Palestine: From the River to the Sea” slogan. This current protest is not about a two-state solution. Instead, these protests openly advocate for eliminating the Jewish presence in Israel. And if that sounds ominous, consider that pro-Palestinian protesters in Australia were on video chanting, “Gas the Jews.” 

But allow me to play the devil’s advocate. What if the Jews have committed atrocities against Palestinians? What then? Would the type of violence we witnessed be acceptable? The Jewish and Arab concepts of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth notwithstanding, we know what one Jew from Nazareth taught. When the rabble Judas led came to arrest Jesus, impetuous Peter pulled his sword and cut off Malchus’ ear (John 18.10). Jesus, the Jew under consideration, told Peter to put his sword away. Note Matthew’s account of these events in Matthew 26.51–53:

And behold, one of those who were with Jesus reached and drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear. Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword will perish by the sword. Or do you think that I cannot appeal to My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve legions of angels? (NASB) 

Jesus sought to contrast His followers with those coming to arrest Him. Those men Judas led had swords and clubs. And Jesus asked them why they treated Him like He was the leader of some revolt (see Matthew 26.55). This mob did not need to threaten His person with physical violence. Jesus was not going to fight them. If He wanted to, Jesus could have called for 72,000 angels to protect Him (Matthew 26.53). However, 72,000 angels would have been overkill. With but one angel, God slew 185,000 Assyrians that had come to attack King Hezekiah (see 2 Kings 19.35).

Jesus acknowledged the legitimacy of the other sword, which was present, and had come to arrest Him in this moment of the “two swords,” even though His arrest was unjust (see Romans 13.4; John 18.3). In other words, Jesus recognized and submitted to the authority of the Romans. As He told Pilate, the spiritual nature of His Kingdom meant that His servants would not fight (see John 18.36). 

Though Jesus did not teach us to be doormats, He reminded us to “turn the other cheek” when the situation requires it (Matthew 5.39). If you observe the text from Matthew 26 again, Jesus did not tell Peter to disarm himself but to put his sword back in its place. Again, this was not a time for violence. Jesus was aware of the bigger picture and the larger purpose of His mission. Jesus knew that resorting to violence at that moment would detract from His more excellent message and mission. One can apply this strategy to any cause; the methods used to advance a cause can significantly impact the perception and success of the cause itself. Jesus knew that His path required that His enemies lift Him up so He could draw the world to Himself (see John 12.31–33).

Hence, even if we were to say that Israelis “earned” the violence dealt to them by Hamas, the methods used to advance the cause—beheading babies, raping women, killing the elderly—impact public perception of their alleged cause. It sours the stomach and jaundices the eye. It’s better to walk the path of nonviolent resistance than give your detractors the rationale they need to justify their violent retribution against you. And in the days ahead, we will no doubt see much more violence in Gaza. 

As we continue to follow the unfolding events between Israel and Hamas, we must learn the lessons that history and the Bible have to teach us about violence and the repercussions of our actions and beliefs. The advice to avoid escalation and seek understanding is universally applicable, regardless of whether we are policymakers, commentators, or observers. Wisdom and compassion pave the way to long-lasting solutions, while violence breeds more violence irrespective of the justification or historical context. We can only hope that the leaders of all parties learn from history and pursue paths that lead to peace, reconciliation, and coexistence. 

“Let’s Go Back To Church”

Neal Pollard

A law enforcement officer interviewed on a Chicago news station was commenting on the most recent, tragic shooting, this one in the Windy City’s northern suburb town of Highland Park. He began talking about root causes of these shootings, comparing these shooters to weeds that pop up various places. In the midst of this, he made an incredible statement: “Let’s go back to church.”

I got to thinking about what, if any, connection these shooters had with organized religion. Is there a trend? In 2018, John Lott, President of Crime Prevention Research Center, wrote, “What is most shocking is how few of these killers appear to be religious, let alone Christian. Just 16 percent have any type of religious affiliation at the time of their attacks, with a slight majority of those being Muslims” (https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/religion-of-mass-public-shooters/). His criteria was a mass public shooting in which at least four people were killed. He counted 69 killers in 66 shootings from 1998-2018. Just four of these identified themselves as Christians and just three were “clearly regular church goers” (ibid.). 

On the other side of the coin, The New York Times shared the results of a study done by the University of Kentucky of 3000 participants in 13 countries. The lead paragraph by writer Benedict Carey states, “Most people around the world, whether religious or not, presume that serial killers are more likely to be atheists than believers in any god, suggests a new study, which counters the common assumption that increasingly secular societies are equally tolerant of nonbelievers. Avowed atheists exhibited the same bias in judging sadistic criminals, the study found” (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/health/atheists-religion-study.html). 

But, truly this is not about finger-pointing. For those with a biblical worldview, we can see a connection between society’s that violate God’s will and a great many consequences (Prov. 14:34). That is perhaps a needed point for a different article. Instead, consider something about the wisdom of God in how He intended the church to function and behave. From the very beginning, the church was established to be a place of community and fellowship (Acts 2:42). It was also designed to be a place of internal accountability (1 Cor. 5; Gal. 6:1-2; Jas. 5:19-20). In Christ, the individual is given a better, more positive view of self (1 Pet. 2:5,9; 1 John 3:1-3), of fellow-believers (John 13:34-35), and even those who are different than them and even persecutors of them (Mat. 5:38-48). 

I would argue that there are so many more reasons why one should consider attending church. There is an eternal gain that makes anything which happens in this life bearable (Rev. 2:10). There are spiritual blessings in such abundance that it’s hard to count them all (Eph. 1:3ff).  There I a joy in serving with others and in the serving of others (Gal. 5:13; John 13:12-17). Yet, there is also an antidote to isolation and the frightening results of the echo chamber that occurs in the absence of others to help balance and challenge us to be better and live better. Isolation and loneliness seem to be occurring in epidemic proportions. This certainly is a scourge on mental health, but it also has social, emotional, spiritual, and even physical consequences. Perhaps that law enforcement expert is right. Maybe the answer is as simple as, “Let’s go back to church.”

“Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb. 10:23-25).

via Flickr (creative commons)

The Age Of Rage

Monday’s Column: Neal At The Cross

Neal Pollard

For the last few years, it has become vogue to refer to the current state of incivility as “the age of rage.” The British newspaper, The Guardian, featured an article in 2019 by Oliver Burkeman, entitled, “The age of rage: are we really living in angrier times?” Janie Watkins wrote the book, “The Age of Rage”: This is a mad, mad world, in 2005. While it’s written in the context of America, it points back to examples like Nebuchadnezzar, Ahab, and other Bible characters, alongside modern dictators and megalomaniacs. At least one source, Science Focus, wisely observes, “The Age Of Rage: Why Social Media Makes Us So Angry…And What You Can Do About It” (3/20). Writers in Australia, Ireland, and other countries are all observing the same disturbing trend of people who disagree being willing to amplify their indignation with intimidation and violence. Outrage has simply become rage.

Any number of current events in the last few years would serve to prove that we’ve gone that far in our society. Civilization depends on civility. More than that, Christianity, as Jesus and His disciples teach it in the New Testament, requires us to “be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves” as He sends us out “as sheep in the midst of wolves” (Mat. 10:16). You see, it doesn’t matter how the world acts. God expects us to assuage the rage.

The Bible identifies what qualifies as rage. The main word translated “rage” in modern translations is thumos, and it is found eighteen times in the New Testament. The NASB renders it “rage” (Luke 4:28; Acts 19:28), “indignation” (Rom. 2:8), “angry tempers” (2 Cor. 12:20), “outbursts of anger” (Gal. 5:20), “wrath” (Eph. 4:31; Col. 3:8; Heb. 11:27; etc.), and “passion” (Rev. 14:8; 18:3). This word means the “intense expression of the inner self; a state of intense displeasure” (BDAG 461). Louw-Nida says, “an intense, passionate desire of an overwhelming and possibly destructive character” (290). Kittel explains that the verb from which this noun comes originally conveyed “violent movement” and “to boil up” and “smoke” and the noun came to mean what is moved–desire, impulse, disposition, thought, and anger (TDNTA 339). Picture a person’s temperament as a potentially seething volcano. Rather than controlling it, the person allows what’s inside to freely boil over. That is rage!

With intensifying rhetoric from those in the world who threaten harm in expressing their rage, what does God call you and me to do? First, at the basic level, we are not to sin in our anger (Eph. 4:26). Second, never take your own revenge (Rom. 12:19). Third, replace quarrelsomeness with kindness, patience (even when wronged), and gentleness (2 Tim. 2:24-25). Fourth, malign no one, but be peaceable, gentle, showing every consideration for all men (Titus 3:2).

Warning: This is not how the world thinks nor what the world will do, in many cases. But in the age of rage, we have a higher law. Simply put, it is, “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Rom. 12:21). It’s not a matter of what that may or may not do for our personal causes, but what will it do to advance the cause of Christ. It’s why He has us in this age, to help the world see His way. Those who follow it will experience eternal joy, the antithesis and antidote to this age of rage!

Disturbed

Neal Pollard

The ISIS beheadings so frequently in the news and readily available on the internet are terrifying to behold and consider.  If terrorism is, as the Mac Dictionary defines it, “the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims,” such would be terrorist activity.  The latest spectacle, involving 21 “Coptic Christians” (Egyptian Orthodox religion), seems to show the Islamic State organization is eager to isolate and persecute those seeking to follow Christ.

Do you ever wonder if there will come a day where New Testament Christians in this country may face the threat of death for standing up for Christ?  It has certainly happened to God’s people in the past, especially when the church was first established.  We read about the persecution that started with Stephen then extended to the saints at Jerusalem in the book of Acts.  We read of individuals like Paul, who suffered for Christ on many occasions (2 Cor. 11).  Then, there are the statements made to encourage Christians who might be rattled or scared at the prospect of such treatment.  Twice, writing the Thessalonians, Paul was concerned they would be disturbed by trouble (1 Th. 3:3; 2 Th. 2:2).  He wrote about how persecution was, at times, inevitable (Ph. 1:29; 1 Th. 3:4; 2 Tim. 2:3; 1 Pt. 3:14).  Of course, Christ showed us His way includes suffering (1 Pt. 2:21ff).

The Bible also gives us great encouragement in the face of the disturbing prospect of suffering for our faith.  Consider a few highlights:

  • We can rejoice if counted worthy of suffering for Christ (Acts 5:41).
  • Those who suffer with Him will be glorified with Him (Rom. 8:17).
  • Suffering can give one a clearer perspective and priority (Phil. 3:8).
  • Suffering is a plain indication of God’s righteous judgment so that we’ll be counted worthy of His Kingdom (2 Th. 1:5).
  • It finds favor with God if we are faithful through our sufferings (1 Pt. 2:19).
  • It is better to suffer for doing right than doing wrong (1 Pt. 4:17).
  • We can entrust our souls to a faithful Creator in doing what is right (1 Pt. 4:19).
  • The God of all grace will comfort those who suffer (1 Pt. 5:10).

I don’t think any of us relish or welcome the thought of suffering under any circumstances.  Yet, God has communicated these truths to us to help us decide in these potential trials.  Perhaps it will help us be less disturbed and more determined to be faithful even to the point of death (Rev. 2:10).