Tag: Genesis

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XLI)

Joseph’s Purity And Integrity (39:1-23)

Neal Pollard

Moses resumes the saga of the rejected brother, Joseph, who through slave traders made his way into the home of a prominent Egyptian soldier named Potiphar (1). In this chapter, we learn much more about the character of a young man who had gone from favored son to subjugated stranger in a foreign land. He appears friendless, but not alone (2)! 

Joseph was blessed (2-6). Most of all, he was blessed because “the Lord was with him” (2-3). He was also blessed with competency and capability (3,6). He was blessed with people skills (4). He was even blessed with a good physique and handsome features (6). Despite the traumatic events that led him to Egypt, Joseph did not sulk or surrender in defeat. He made the most of what God gave him. We do well to do as the song says: “Count your blessings, name them one by one; Count your blessings, see what God has done” (Eph. 1:3; Rom. 2:4). 

Joseph was besieged (7-12). Joseph drew more than the admiration of his master’s wife. He was the object of her unwholesome desire (7). She illustrates the progressive nature of sin. First, she lusted (7). Then, she propositioned him (7). She totally ignored his well-reasoned refusal (8-9). She persisted in her efforts to seduce him, “day after day” (10). Finally, she waited for an opportune moment when they were alone to step up her immoral pursuit (11-12). 

How hard was this for Joseph? We are not told whether or not Potiphar’s wife was pretty, but we know she was powerful. Joseph was a young man with presumably normal, God-given sexual desires. Joseph was far from home, might have felt forgotten by God, and had tried repeatedly to resist this woman’s advances. He could have said, “Oh, well. I tried.” But he did not give in and would not give in to her seduction.

Joseph was betrayed (13-20). We are not told if it was embarrassment at being rebuffed or fear that her aggression might be discovered, but she lies about what happened. Joseph, in his effort to escape her literal clutches, left the garment that she had grabbed in her hand as he fled (13). She shows the men of the household the garment, claiming he had tried to force himself on her (14-16). She repeated the lie to Potiphar later that day and even insinuates Potiphar was partially to blame (17-19). Potiphar’s anger burns and he has Joseph thrown in prison (19-20). 

Be reminded that sometimes you will suffer through no fault of your own. You can be the victim of others’ lies, slander, and scorn. Peter’s words are spiritual salve: “Make sure that none of you suffers as a murderer, or thief, or evildoer, or a troublesome meddler; but if anyone suffers as a Christian, he is not to be ashamed, but is to glorify God in this name” (1 Pet. 4:15-16).

Joseph was buoyant (21-23). There is no indication that Joseph grew bitter against God. Did he wonder what he had done wrong to suffer at the hands of his brother then his master’s wife? If so, Scripture is silent about it. Later, he indicates that he saw God’s hand with him through all of this (50:20). No, Joseph landed on his feet in the prison. Why? God continued to uphold him. God was with Joseph, extended kindness to him, and gave him favor in the sight of the chief jailor (21). He is given responsibility once more (22). The Lord made him to prosper (23).

Joseph is a great example of a New Testament principle applicable to every child of God. “If God is for us, who can be against us?” (Rom. 8:31b). Also, there is no temptation too great that we must give in; God will provide a way of escape and help us endure whatever we face (1 Cor. 10:13). He did that for Joseph and He will do that for you and me. 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XL)

Judah And Tamar (38:1-30)

Neal Pollard

Moses makes an important aside from the Joseph narrative to share an incident which is crucial to later Israelite history. More than that, it establishes a vital link in the Messianic genealogies. It further highlights the dysfunction in the family of God’s chosen people, reminding us that “For He says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.’ So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy” (Rom. 9:16-17). 

Judah’s choice of mate was suspect (1-13).  While the text does not go into great detail about the character of Shua, it is a Canaanite family. Later, as the conquest of Canaan came closer to fruition, there would be repeated warnings not to marry with them (Ex. 34:12-16). Already, Judah’s grandfather, Isaac, had seen the foolishness of such (28:1ff). 

The Bible does not explicitly condemn Judah’s choice, but there are signs that it brought trouble. He departed from his brothers and lived with a Canaanite man (1), putting him in contact with Shua whose daughter he married (2). We are not told what kind of mother Judah’s wife was, but the sons were no spiritual prize. It can be presumed that his eldest son, Er, got his wife, Tamar, from among the Canaanites (6,11). Er was so wicked that “the Lord took his life” (7). His brother, Onan, expected to raise up seed to his brother, rebelled against this purpose and was likewise struck down by God (9-10). Tamar would prove to be no bastion of morality, either (13ff). 

Judah’s moral bearings were skewed (14-26). Perhaps related to the first observation, Judah’s grasp of right and wrong is warped. First, he breaks his promise to Tamar to give his third son, Shelah, to Tamar once the young man is grown. It is when she sees that he has reneged that she engages in her dubious behavior (14-18). After Judah’s wife dies (12), he allows himself the sinful indulgence to take what he thought to be a temple prostitute (15-16). He did not know that this was his daughter-in-law since she covered her face with a veil. As the result of their union, Tamar becomes pregnant. When Judah hears of this, he is ready to put her to death. But she had garnered an insurance policy, taking personal effects of Judah’s as pledge for promised payment. When she heard he was ready to take such drastic action, she presents the effects letting him know he was the father. Shamed by this matter, a cooler head prevails. She gives birth to twins, and ultimately from this lineage the Messiah will be born (Mat. 1:3).

Judah provides a stark contrast in character to his brother, Joseph, as we will see in chapter 39. Sterling even in the face of pressure and probable temptation, Joseph chooses purity and integrity. That certainly does not describe Judah’s actions in this chapter.

Judah’s flaws did not frustrate God’s ultimate plans. From the time Noah and his family come off the ark after God cleansed the earth of wickedness, He observes, “…the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth” (8:21). God shows His power, His foreknowledge, His wisdom, and His purpose by accomplishing His will through flawed individuals like Judah. Incredibly, His Son would be born of this tribe! God teaches us a powerful lesson that He is able to do above all we ask or think according to His power at work within us (Eph. 3:20)! Aren’t you thankful that God still pursues His purpose of redemption through weak and sinful people like you and me (1 Cor. 1:21)? 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXIX)

They Hated Him Even More (37:1-36)

Neal Pollard

Moses lays down one more peg in the progression of this inspired account, with the repeated marker “these are the records of the generations…” (2). He focuses on Jacob’s sons and most especially “the son of his old age,” Joseph (3). Jacob’s father and mother had played favorites, to disastrous results. Despite himself, Jacob (Israel) “loved Joseph more than all his sons” (3). This created destructive dysfunction. 

He indicates this elevated favor with a tunic. While the Septuagint (Greek O.T.) and Vulgate call it a coat of “many colors,” it was likely an expensive, ornamented, and long robe. A great discussion of this is found in Reyburn and Fry’s “A Handbook On Genesis”: “Speiser finds support in cuneiform inventories that suggest it was ‘an ornamented tunic,’ that is, a tunic or robe that was decorated by sewing ornaments to the cloth. Von Rad describes it as ‘a luxury which only those who did not have to work could think of having.’ In summary the garment may refer to a robe, coat, or long shirt-like piece of clothing. It was clearly a very special garment that gave Joseph a status not shared by his brothers” (848). 

With this tension in the background, we find the pivotal actions of this chapter resonating throughout the rest of the book of Genesis (with the exception of Moses’ inclusion of Judah’s indiscretion with Tamar in chapter 38; that is an aside which helps provide an emphasis on this final “toledoth” on Judah and Joseph whose descendants would be most prominent among the tribes).  Let us notice some important features of this chapter, wherein Joseph’s favor led to his fall.

The favoritism (1-4). Jacob’s foolish decision to make a special coat for his favorite son is only one way we see the favoritism highlighted. Moses casts a contrast by mentioning the maids of Rachel and Leah, underlings of less favored status than Joseph. The mention of Bilhah and Zilpah make us think of Rachel when we read about Joseph. Moses then notes that Joseph is the son of his old age. 

The fuel for their fury (3-11). While their later behavior is wholly unjustified, we can sympathize to some degree with the brothers’ dislike of Joseph. Not only do they resent the special status signified by the tunic (4), but there is the bad report Joseph gave his father about them (2) topped off by the two dreams that must have seemed the height of audacity (5-10). In both dreams, his family would bow down to him. The brothers are jealous (11), and even his father rebukes him for sharing the dream (10). We are left to wonder if Joseph struggles with either immaturity or self-righteousness, but the greater fault lies with the brothers and how their resentment grew into something far more sinister. 

The fateful fall (12-30,36). Things dramatically change one particular day when his brothers are tending the sheep in Shechem. Jacob sends Joseph to check on his brothers (12). Many have observed the steady stream of providence flowing through this entire account. For Joseph, this begins with the events already highlighted that led his brothers to hate him. But it can be seen in the minute details of the account. Joseph is lost and happens to run into a man who knew where his brothers were (15-17). They move their flocks from Shechem to Dothan, which puts them where a caravan route was (17,28). Reuben will happen to be present to ensure Joseph isn’t killed by his jealous brothers, but is absent when Judah recommends they sell him to the Midianite traders (28). The traders take him to Egypt and sell him to Potiphar, Pharaoh’s officer, captain of his bodyguard (36). Judah will sell them on the idea of making profit on their hated brother rather than bringing blood-guiltiness on themselves by killing him (27).

Matthews notes, “This garment introduces the important literary idea of clothing in the Joseph narrative. The bestowal and removal of Joseph’s attire signified change in his social standing. The stripping of his garment by his brothers (v. 23) and the seizure of his cloak by Potiphar’s wife (39:12–13) represented his descending status—from favored son to slave, from slave overseer to prisoner. The snatched garments were used in both cases to bolster false claims against Joseph” (NAC, 689). 

The forlorn father (31-35). The brothers sell the lie to their brother by dipping Joseph’s tunic in goat’s blood and through insinuation and deception convincing their father that Joseph was dead. This causes Jacob protracted (34) and inconsolable grief (35). As he had lost Joseph’s mother, his favored wife, prematurely, now he had lost his favored son. Unbeknownst to him, Joseph was alive if not well in Potiphar’s house.

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXVIII)

THE LEAST FAMILIAR CHAPTER OF GENESIS (36:1-43)?

Neal Pollard

Of all books of the Bible, we should probably be most familiar with Genesis. After all, it is the first “chapter” and the place we begin again and again. With disclosures about Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Noah, Abraham, on down to Joseph and his brothers, it is the fodder of children’s Bible classes and many a sermon. But what about the genealogies of Esau? That material does not come readily to the mind nor do the details roll steadily off the tongue. Yet, the Holy Spirit through Moses saw fit to devote what we recognize as 43 verses of sacred text to it! 

Frankly, it is almost entirely a record of begetting, of those who became prominent among this genealogical line, of places named for them or inhabited by them, and details that help give background to some later Bible events. The summary statement reminds us that Esau is “the father of the Edomites” (43). More about that in a moment. What is accomplished by the inclusion of all these verses devoted to the family tree of Isaac’s oldest son?

We learn why Esau settled east of Jacob (1-8). The initial statement about the generations of Esau (Edom) concerns the children born to him in the land of Canaan by the “daughters of Canaan” (2,5). However, the prosperity of both brothers made living in the same place untenable. Like with Abraham and Lot, they each needed ample pasturelands. So, Esau went up to the hill country of Seir (8). 

We learn who was born to him in his new homeland (9-43). Moses traces the lineage of Esau through his wives, Adah, Basemath, and Oholibamah (10-18). Then, we read the lineage of Seir. These are inhabitants already in the land who play a prominent role in the development of the Edomite people. As Hamilton says of Genesis 36, it “is moving backward from the conquerors (vv. 9–19) to the conquered (vv. 20–30)” (NICOT, 397). Groups like the Horites, whom some identify with the Hivites, are driven out by Esau’s descendants (21,29-30). In accordance with Isaac’s “blessing”, Esau became an indomitable warrior (27:39-40). 

We learn how Esau’s descendants appointed kings before Jacob’s did (31-39). Smith observes, “At the time Moses wrote Genesis the descendants of Esau already had achieved this state of national development, while Israel had not. The comparatively slow political development of Israel was a challenge to their national faith through the centuries” (The Pentateuch, p. 206). Centuries of time pass after the Edomites appoint kings before Saul comes to the throne in Israel. No doubt, Edom was one of the nations Samuel’s contemporaries looked at when complaining that other nations had kings (1 Sam. 8:5-6). 

We learn through an object lesson a truth the Bible repeats. In God’s sovereignty, He chose Jacob as the descendant through whom Israel and ultimately Christ would come. That means He did not choose (or rejected) Esau. As Kurt Strassner stated so well, “Their names do not roll off my tongue like the names of Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher” (Opening Up Genesis, p. 134). Their inclusion in this chapter implicitly reminds us how comparatively anonymous Esau’s descendants are. This is stated explicitly by Malachi (1:2-5) and Paul (Rom. 9:10-16). 

Perhaps you will find Edward Bridge’s background explanation helpful: “Archaeological evidence indicates Edomite influence in southern Judah from the late eighth century bc onwards. Evidence also indicates that Edom was a threat to Judah in the years before the exile (Arad 24, a letter-ostracon). After the exile, Edomites who survived Nabataean invasions migrated to southern Judah and became the Idumeans—the people from which Herod the Great came” (Barry, Lexham B.D., np). The inspired recorders of Israelite history (2 Ki. 8:20) as well as the prophets (Jer. 49:7-22; Ezek. 26:12-24; Obadiah; Mal. 1:2-5) reveal the intense rivalry that continued between the descendants of Jacob and Esau sparked not only by the events of the brothers’ lives but also the inhospitality of the Edomites when Moses led the Exodus. Because the Edomites will span the entirety of Old Testament history and regularly intersect the lives of Israel, it is helpful to see their genealogical record. 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXVII)

WORSHIP, A NEW NAME, AND THREE FUNERALS (35:1-29)

Neal Pollard

In the unfolding narrative centering on the ancestors of the Jewish nation, Moses continues to follow the sojourn of Jacob. Here, God calls Jacob to leave Shechem for Bethel, where he had seen God in a dream (28:10). He does so with the commands “arise,” “go,” “live,” and “make.” There is unfinished business in Bethel (3), a vow to fulfill (28:20-22). There is unfinished business in Shechem, too–the disposal of all idols (the wearing of these earrings must have symbolized idolatry for them) and ritual purification (2-4). Was it symbolic to bury their foreign gods in Shechem before Jacob built the altar and “the house of God” in Bethel, demonstrating a complete change of allegiance (6-7; cf. 28:22)? 

They were able to journey in safety, as there was a great terror on the surrounding cities (5). Apparently, this is providential in the wake of the brutality of his sons against the men of Shechem (ch. 34). God is keeping His promise to be with Jacob wherever he goes. 

The first of three deaths noted in the chapter is that of Rebekah’s nurse, Deborah (8). It is odd that the death of Rebekah’s maid is mentioned, but the death of Rebekah is not (until Jacob is dying)(49:31). We deduce that Deborah came to live with Jacob’s family some time after Rebekah died. Interestingly, another Deborah would later sit under the tree in Bethel and judge the descendants of Jacob (Jud. 4:5). 

After this burial, God appears to Jacob again and reconfirms the covenant with him (9-13). The giving of his new name, Israel, and the promise of descendants, nations, and land prompt Jacob to set up a memorial stone and offer up worship to God (14-15). This takes our minds back to Genesis 22:18ff, and here we have the only record of a drink offering in the book of Genesis though it will become part of later worship in the Old Testament. 

The next funeral is devastating for Jacob, but it constitutes both a birth and a death. Rachel has become pregnant again, and she gives birth to Benjamin. She names him “son of my sorrow,” but Jacob renames him “son of my right hand” (16-19). Jacob recalls that she dies to his great sorrow (48:7), and she is buried on the way to Bethlehem. 

They continue their journey, ostensibly on their way to see Isaac. Jacob is called Israel for the first time in verse 21. They camp “beyond the tower of Eder” (21; its location is unknown), and this stop is noted because of what Jacob’s eldest, Reuben, does to him there. While Jacob’s reaction is not stated here, we know from narratives like Absalom how detestable this action was. Reuben sleeps with Bilhah, Rachel’s maid. He was the son of Leah. It is very difficult to believe this was not done in spite, Reuben knowing Jacob’s preference for Rachel over his own mother. Jacob will curse him at the end of his life, saying of him, “Uncontrolled as water, you shall not have preeminence, Because you went up to your father’s bed; Then you defiled it—he went up to my couch” (Gen. 49:4). The chronicler adds this historical note: “Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel (for he was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph the son of Israel; so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright” (1 Chron. 5:1). 

Moses summarizes the children of Israel in verses 22-26 by their mothers. The chapter ends with Jacob attending the third funeral during this undoubtably dark period of his life. His father, Isaac, dies at Hebron, being 180 (28-29). We find Jacob and Esau together again, burying their father in the cave of Macpelah (49:31). 

Jacob has been refined by sorrow, but also by worship. God had foreknown what he could be and worked patiently with him as he was being transformed into that. He had been a giver of heartache, but he had reaped plenty of the same. As we read about Jacob, let us not forget that God sees us for what we can be. He is at work at us through various means to accomplish that. It is our choice, whether or not we will allow him to be at work in us (Col. 1:28; Jas. 1:4). 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXVI)

Two Wrongs (34:1-31)

Neal Pollard

Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had all practiced deceit. The first two did so in a misguided attempt to protect themselves from harm. Jacob’s deceit was more aggressive, an act calculated to steal his brother’s blessing away. Isn’t it interesting how the influence of our sin grows. Jacob has two sons, Simeon and Levi, whose deceit will be calculated to take the lives of a great many Hivite men. Not only will they be deceitful, but they will be murderous (25-26), avaricious (27-29), and proud (31). It has been observed that Jacob had changed, but “Jacob could not change his boys. God would have to bring them to a crisis of their own, as we will see later” (Strassner, 133-134).

Genesis 34 “possesses no prayers, no divine revelations, no mention of promissory blessings, and no explicit mention of God” (Matthews, NAC, 578). Virtually every action is driven by the flesh. We do not know if there was any questionable motive on Dinah’s part for consorting with the local women, but she did not deserve what happens to her. Shechem, though respected more than all in his father’s household (19), did the deplorable. He raped Dinah (2). While he “was deeply attracted to Dinah,” “loved the girl and spoke tenderly to her” (3), and wanted to marry her (4), the potential union was predicated upon sin and violence. Jacob heard about the rape and secretly told his sons (5). Jacob takes no decisive action and gives no recorded reply to Shechem’s father’s request for Dinah to marry Shechem (6-12).

Dinah’s brothers, Simeon and Levi, disgusted by the very marriage proposal but bent on revenge, answer Hamor and Shechem “with deceit, because he had defiled Dinah their sister” (13). We can talk ourselves into some horrible, sinful actions when we feel we are in the right or avenging some wrong! No wonder Scripture repeatedly says, “Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God” (Rom. 12:19; Deut. 32:35-36; Ps. 94:1; Heb. 10:30). 

The ploy is simple, ingenious, and successful. Dinah’s brothers’ request is rooted in truth, but is twisted for their vengeful plot. God had given Abraham’s descendants the covenant of circumcision, but Simeon and Levi had no intention for there to be any marriage or giving in marriage. For their part, the Hivites were eager to comply out of greed in sharing in Jacob’s wealth. The men of the city said, “Will not their livestock and their property and all their animals be ours? Only let us consent to them, and they will live with us” (23). So, they consent in unison to be circumcised. On the third day, when they are in pain from their operations and weakened, Simeon and Levi kill every male with the edge of the sword (25-26). All of Jacob’s sons appear guilty of looting (27-29). 

Now that the rage is assuaged and their bloodthirstiness is sated, there is the aftermath. This is a diplomatic disaster. Jacob rebukes Simeon and Levi, and explain the ramifications of their deeds. They will have to move, as they would become “odious” to the people of the land (30). The boys were so blind by their wrath that they still justified themselves for their actions, saying, “Should he treat our sister as a harlot?” (31). I am reminded of Solomon’s wise words, “All the ways of a man are clean in his own sight, But the Lord weighs the motives” (Prov. 16:2) and “Every man’s way is right in his own eyes, But the Lord weighs the hearts” (Prov. 21:2). On his deathbed, Jacob will call these boys into account and it will cost them their inheritance (49:5-7). 

Shechem fired the first shot. It was an awful act of violence. But that did not justify the reaction of Simeon and Levi. God would have handled the situation. He does not need our help to take matters into our own hands. It was a costly lesson and a great many paid the price! 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXV)

Reunited (33:1-20)

Neal Pollard

Have you ever dreaded something so entirely that you couldn’t eat, sleep, or concentrate? Some looming and fearful prospect, a dreaded conversation, some bill or taxes, an anticipated diagnosis, is all-consuming and prevents you from functioning like normal? That surely describes the emotion of Jacob in anticipation of seeing a brother from whose presence he had fled decades earlier. He sees Esau and his 400 men coming (1), so he braces for the confrontation by dividing his wives, maids, and their children presumably in favored order with Rachel and Joseph at the very rear (2). He goes to the head of the line and humbles himself by bowing seven times to the ground before he reaches his brother (3). Can you imagine? Perhaps he feels that these are his last moments on earth. 

Esau comes running toward him, but imagine Jacob’s surprise when he’s met with a hearty hug and kiss instead of a sword or fist (4). Both of them weep (4). Esau looks at the caravan of children along with their mothers and he inquires about them. Jacob introduces the eleven sons and his daughter, with Zilpah, Bilhah, Leah, and Rachel (5-7). After meeting them, Esau’s next concern is why Jacob had met him with such an extravagant gift (8-11; cf. 32:13-16). Jacob explains that God has blessed him tremendously and he wishes to share that with his cheated brother (10-11). After some persuasion, Esau reluctantly accepts it (11).

Then, Esau extends hospitality to his brother (12-16). Jacob politely declines both overtures, explaining that his company could not keep pace (13-14) and that Esau leaving men in their company is too much and not necessary (15). Jacob is relieved to experience Esau’s mercy and is content to move on with his life assured in the knowledge of their reconciliation. We assume that they parted on good terms, but the text is silent.

Both brothers are transformed. Jacob has both gotten a generous taste of his own medicine with Laban and received revelation and blessings from God. It has changed him, a thoroughly penitent, sacrificial, courageous man who faces his brother. Esau is no longer bitter or resentful, but even generous and certainly magnanimous. What a beautiful picture of two men who were once at odds but who could see the bigger picture. The fact that they were brothers was more important than what once divided them. What a lesson for God’s people today!

The chapter ends by charting Jacob’s resumption of his journey toward Canaan. He had fled 700 miles from Beersheba northeast to Haran, but had now traversed most of that distance back toward the southwest. Leaving his brother in modern-day Jordan, he crosses into the land of Canaan going from Succoth to Paddan-aram to Shechem (16-19). He bought a piece of land there and, just like his father and grandfather, he prioritizes worship by building an altar and called it “God, God of Israel” (20). From deceiver to devotee, schemer to supplicant, and conniver to committed, Jacob is no longer the man who conspired with his mother to steal from his brother and lie to his father. He is “Israel,” the one who not only strove with God but was permanently changed by his encounter with Him. 

Think back to your “old man.” If you reflect honestly, those times were not as enjoyable and fulfilling as you might have told yourself at the time. There is no happiness minus commitment to God. But look at how God shaped and transformed you through His Word, His providence, His blessings, and His goodness. As you’ve grown in trust and commitment, think of how much better life is as you’ve striven to become the “new man.” It’s truly fulfilling (Rom. 12:2; Eph. 4:23; Titus 3:5-6). Jacob appears to have experienced such a process and was blessed for it! 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXIV)

Israel (32:1-32)

Neal Pollard

“A new name is almost always the symbol of a new beginning” (Strassner, p. 129). As Jacob comes to the place he names “Mahanaim,” dubbed “Two Camps” because he saw the angels of God there (1-2), he knows he must pass through the territory of his brother, Esau. He has extricated himself from an old situation (dealing with Laban) and faces an even older score to settle (reuniting with the brother he cheated), but he does so with a newly-delivered assignment from heaven to return to Canaan (31:3). 

Jacob decides to “appease” his brother by sending ahead messengers detailing all the wealth in livestock and servants that he had accumulated while with Laban with the indication that he will share them with him (5). The messengers report back that they made contact with Esau, and he is coming with 400 men with him (6). Jacob is petrified and is left to ponder his frightening dilemma (7-8). What do we observe in this chapter?

Jacob’s Prayer (9-12)

This is a new way for Jacob to approach the God who had been profusely blessing him. This prayer is marked by intense petition, pleading with God based on His divine instructions to Jacob to return home. The prayer is reverent (9), humble (10), grateful (10), specific (11), transparent (11), yet bold (12). He calls for God to keep His word, to help him as he attempts to obey Him! Has it dawned on him that his cunning and deception will not help him now?

Jacob’s Peace Offering (13-21)

After the prayer, Jacob prepares a “present” (18,20-21) for his brother. It is lavish: 200 female goats, 20 male goats, 200 ewes, 20 rams, 30 milking camels and their colts, 40 cows, 10 bulls, 20 female donkeys, and 10 male donkeys (14-15). This would provide the seed for a massive herd, with sufficient studs to enlarge the flocks of all the animals. His servants making up two companies were to be harbingers for him, informing Esau as they met him that Jacob was to follow (16-20). Jacob hopes that this will prove a peace offering to a brother who years before had vowed to kill him (20; cf. 27:41).

Jacob’s Confrontation (22-32)

Jacob camps with his immediate family across the stream of the Jabbok (22-23). The Jabbok is “a river flowing west into the river Jordan, some 32 kilometers north of the Dead Sea. It rises near Amman…in Jordan and in all is over 96 kilometers long. It is today called the Wadi Zerqa” (D.F. Payne, New Bible Dict., p. 535).  On this occasion, it was the site of Jacob’s wrestling with an enigmatic figure that Jacob ultimately believes to be a “theophany” (visible manifestation of God). Many believe this to be the Angel of Jehovah, the preincarnate Christ who appeared to Hagar in Genesis 16:14. 

This confrontation demonstrates the moral transformation of Jacob. He has depended on his wits and schemes, but in the grip of this being with whom he wrestles and in the grip of the fear of seeing Esau again he is utterly dependent on outside help. Not only does he need the mercy of Esau, more importantly he needs the grace of God. Yet, Jacob’s faith is so great that he wrestles with the man until dawn and, even when the man dislocates his hip, he refuses to let go. It is in the throes of this struggle that he is renamed Israel and told, “…for you have striven with God and with men and have prevailed” (28). As Ross observes, “Now crippled in his natural strength he became bold in faith” (“Jacob at the Jabbok, Israel at Peniel: Part 2 of Studies in the Life of Jacob.” Bibliotheca Sacra 142.255 (1985): 338–354). For Hebrew readers, there is a compelling likeness between “Jabbok” and “Jacob” (a word play?). 

Jacob believes he has wrestled with God. He names the place “Peniel” (“the face of God”) and concludes “I have seen God face to face, yet my life has been preserved” (30). James Smith suggests that Jacob has a new name, a new blessing, and a new testimony (The Pentateuch, 200). Based on the similar language of the Angel of the Lord speaking to Manoah in Judges 13, it is a plausible deduction that this is the preincarnate Christ. It is certainly, at the least, a theophany. The point seems to be that Jacob is transformed by this encounter! 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXXIII)

The Separation Of Jacob And Laban (31:1-55)

Neal Pollard

Things began to heat up for Jacob. His brothers-in-law were bandying about some pretty indicting accusations (1) and his father-in-law’s attitude “was not friendly toward him as formerly” (2). Therefore, God calls for Jacob to leave and return to his homeland under His banner of protection (3). Jacob calls his wives, the sisters Rachel and Leah, to meet him in the field to discuss this situation explaining how God was with him and guiding him in the acquisition of the herds they now possessed (4-16). They not only recognize God’s hand in the situation, but they are eager to depart and feel entitled to all that they collectively owned (16). So it was all decided. 

The exodus (17-21).

Jacob gathers his children and wives and puts them on camels (just another indication of how wealthy Jacob had become), driving his livestock and property to go to Canaan’s land (17-18). The New Living Translation says, “Jacob outwitted Laban the Aramean, for they set out secretly and never told Laban they were leaving. So Jacob took all his possessions with him and crossed the Euphrates River, heading for the hill country of Gilead” (20-21). Remember the nature of these men’s relationship with each other, how secrecy, deception, lying, and outwitting are the words best describing it. Jacob is now on the run! 

The expropriation (19,30,32-35)

Following the example of her husband, Rachel steals her father’s household idol while he is away shearing his sheep (you will notice that the word “deceived” for Jacob in v. 20 is the same word for “stole” in v. 19). This was a labor intensive, yet festive, time, and it would have had Jacob’s in-laws quite preoccupied. Laban will find this theft particularly galling, though he never finds out she was the thief. Jacob did not know either, or he would not have suggested the death penalty for the offender (32).  Cyrus Gordon suggests that taking these teraphim or household gods legally guaranteed an inheritance (“Biblical Customs and the Nuzu Tablets.” The Biblical Archaeologist Reader. Ed. David N. Freedman and Edward F. Campbell. II. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964. 25). Other explanations include that it was used for divination, an activity Laban certainly practiced (30:27) or they were made of precious metal and of great value. More than one of these could be simultaneously true, but whatever their value to Laban he is angry and insistent it be returned. 

The examination (22-35)

Jacob has a three day head start on Laban (22), but the man is determined to catch his son-in-law. It takes him seven days, but he overtakes “in the hill country of Gilead” (23). This is the area where three of Jacob’s sons will desire to make their land inheritance and the place later Old Testament writers allude to as a place of balm, fertility, and green pastures (Song 4:1; Jer. 8:22; Mic. 7:14). 

Here, it is the place of confrontation. Laban is incensed and scolds Jacob for his surreptitious escape (26-28). His stated objection was that he did not get to say goodbye to his daughters and grandchildren. Yet, since God appeared to him and warned him not to take action against Jacob, Laban simply centers his complaint on the stolen teraphim. He searches Jacob’s things and because of Rachel’s crafty ploy does not find it. Jacob admonishes him for his accusation and the tone and tenor of the conversation changes. Jacob has become incensed. 

The exchange (36-54)

It is Jacob’s turn to scold Laban. The essence of his grievance is found in verse 41: “These twenty years I have been in your house; I served you fourteen years for your two daughters and six years for your flock, and you changed my wages ten times.” Yet, Jacob credits God for preventing him from leaving Laban empty-handed and impoverished (42). Jacob’s summary is that “God has seen my affliction and the toil of my hands, so He rendered judgment last night” (42b). 

Laban, now more contrite, urges that the men make a covenant with one another (43-44). Jacob consents (45-46), and the men forge the agreement calling on God to be their witness. Jacob offers a sacrifice and they all spend one last night together on the mountain called Galeed and Mizpah. The next day Laban and company depart from Jacob and his household. Another significant step is taken toward the fulfillment of the land and seed promise first made to Abraham. God has given him victory over one adversary, but looming over the horizon is another. This one will frighten him tremendously! 

GENESIS: THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (XXXII)

OF FLOCKS AND DEALS (30:25-43)

Neal Pollard

Two horse traders lock horns! It is hard to say who was more duplicitous in his dealings with the other, as a case could be made both ways. Now that Jacob has a tent full of children and a virtual harem, not to mention that he had devoted at least a decade and a half of service on Laban’s spread, he is ready to provide for his own household also (30). That will require “income,” and the source of that is the “cattle” (29), “sheep,” and “goats” (32-33). Jacob appeals to his years of service (26), which both men acknowledge had greatly enriched Laban (27,29-30).

Jacob proposes a deal that seems strange to us today and that had to have had the hand of God in it to succeed. Laban wants to know what Jacob wants (31), and Jacob says, “let me pass through your entire flock today, removing from there every speckled and spotted sheep and every black one among the lambs and the spotted and speckled among the goats; and such shall be my wages” (32). Some suggest that these were the rarer colors and types of the sheep, lambs, and goats of the time and place. Whether or not it was, it provided clear delineation between the two men’s flocks. Jacob would tend these livestock and take only the offspring as he describes them and the two men agree upon (33-35). Mathews remarks, “In the future any animals that were found among Jacob’s personal herd that were not of the uncommon varieties must be considered stolen (v. 33). Jacob presumed that Laban would periodically inspect his flocks. By this openness, Jacob wanted to avert any unjust charges of fraud leveled against him. He anticipated trouble with Laban’s family, and he was not far from the mark” (NAC, Vol. 1B, p. 499). 

Throughout this process, each man will try to outmaneuver and outsmart the other. Each is trying to have the advantage over the other, and each appears to think he has gotten the upper hand over the other. Laban hurries his animals away from Jacob, a three days’ journey away (36). Jacob engages in selective crossbreeding to result in larger, healthier herds for himself and smaller, feebler livestock for Laban (37-43). Whether or not Jacob’s odd practice with the peeled tree rods and the water troughs was scientifically sound, God allowed it to succeed. The summary statement of the chapter is, “So the man became exceedingly prosperous, and had large flocks and female and male servants and camels and donkeys” (43).

Jacob had been a supplanter and schemer his entire life. Time and again, he would get a taste of his own medicine. He had been tricked and conned by Laban multiple times. His own sons would sell him a lie when Joseph is older, one he would believe for many years. The Lord’s name is mentioned only in passing (27,30), but the crux of this situation seems to be two men trying to outfox each other. God is working through time and events to bring about the fulfillment of His promise to Abraham. When his in-laws are thoroughly jealous and outraged with Jacob over his scheme, God will lead Jacob and his household away from there and back to their future promised land (31:1ff).

How should we view Jacob’s behavior in this situation? Some see Jacob as trying to produce his own blessings by his cunning and conniving. It is hard to overlook the fact that the Lord, who witnessed all of this, was on Jacob’s side (31:12). Jacob may have been more focused on himself, but God was focused on His eternal plan and His perfect promises. Jacob would continue to reap what he had sown in deceit, but he, like all of us, was a work in progress who needed his faith further refined. That would happen in multiple ways. Jacob would eat the fruit of his schemes.

Of all the lessons we might learn from this, isn’t it much better to trust God’s guidance than to take matters into our own hands? Do we trust Him to take care of our every need and be with us in all our relationships? That does not mean we should not be wise in our dealings with our fellow man, but we should not try and do God’s part for Him.

GENESIS: THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (XXXI)

The Birth Of The Nation Of Israel (29:31-30:24)

Neal Pollard

God promises a nation to Abraham, an elderly man whose wife was barren. Sarah takes matters into her own hands and complicates things with Hagar and Ishmael. Finally, a lone son, Isaac, is born. He grows up, marries Rebekah, and she has twins. The strife between those sons goes literally to their beginning. Jacob wrests the birthright and blessing through cunning and deceit. Now, Jacob settles in Haran amidst the household of a man more cunning and deceitful than himself and marries two of his daughters.  As James Smith puts it, “God would have all self-righteous Israelites to realize the context of jealousy and superstition out of which the twelve tribes emerged” (The Pentateuch, 191). His remarks center specifically on the birth of Jacob’s twelve sons.

Children were conceived out of an unwanted marriage (29:31-35; 30:17-21). Isn’t it interesting that the most prolific child bearer of the four women who slept with Jacob is Leah, the one with the weak (or sparkle-less) eyes whom Jacob never asked for? Repeatedly, these verses speak of how the Lord saw and heard these women who appeal to Him. Leah bears Jacob Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, and Dinah. 

Have you considered that two of the most important features of the Israelite system, the priesthood (Levi) and the monarchy (Judah), came from this unwanted union? The handmaids were proxies of these sisters. From a fleshly point of view, one would conclude that Jacob neither suffered nor complained about these arrangements. But how it sullied the resulting nation! Contrast the establishment of Israel with the establishment of the church. The founder of the church was born of a virgin and was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Resulting from this union was a “chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for His own possession” (1 Pet. 2:9). 

Children were born of proxies (30:1-7; 30:8-13). As already mentioned, each sister gave their handmaid to Jacob to raise up children in their name. This seems an odd arrangement to the modern, western mind, but such children were recognized as belonging to the woman who loans her out to her husband. Think of the many complications that arose from deviating from God’s plan for marriage. Polygamy, concubines, and handmaids were not part of God’s original pattern (Mat. 19:8). Rachel’s maid, Bilhah, gives Jacob Dan (“vindication”) and Naphtali (“wrestlings of God”). Leah’s maid, Zilpah, bears Jacob Gad (“fortune”) and Asher (“happy”). Incidentally, notice the brighter outlook of Leah contrasted with Rachel–who apparently despite her beauty might have had a more difficult-to-deal-with side (see 30:1-3). Rather than waiting on the Lord, these women imitated their ancestor, Sarah, in getting ahead of God! 

Children were attempted through superstition, but granted through supplication (30:14-16,22-24). An interesting event is recorded in the midst of the childbearing wars that may be confusing without closer investigation. In the late spring or early summer, Leah’s eldest, Reuben, found mandrakes in the field and brought them to his mom (14; see Song 7:13). When Rachel hears about this, she arranges a deal with Leah in which she gets conjugal rights to Jacob in exchange for this fruit/herb. 

This might be baffling, but a little research explains why Rachel would want this so badly. Easton explains, “The weight of authority is in favour of its being regarded as the Mandragora officinalis of botanists, ‘a near relative of the night-shades, the ‘apple of Sodom’ and the potato plant.’ It possesses stimulating and narcotic properties….The fruit of this plant resembles the potato-apple in size, and is of a pale orange colour. It has been called the ‘love-apple.’ The Arabs call it ‘Satan’s apple.’ It still grows near Jerusalem, and in other parts of Palestine” (Easton Dictionary, 442-443).

Notice, however, that Leah appeals to God and He blesses her with three more children. She credits Him in the naming of Issachar and Zebulun (18-20) and apparently also in the naming of Dinah (“acquitted”; “vindicated”), Jacob’s only daughter mentioned in the account. The text tells us that God remembered Rachel and finally opened her womb as she apparently cried out to Him for help (22). If the mandrakes played a part, Scripture does not say so. In fact, we have every reason to believe that it was only by Rachel’s trust and God’s power that the heretofore impossible was finally done. 

Eleven sons and a daughter now make up Jacob’s dysfunctional domicile. As we will see next, Jacob’s family has grown to the extent that he is ready to leave his father’s household and establish his own in what he considers “my own country” (25-26). The family and faith failures enmeshed in these births, the resulting dysfunction, will show itself again in several future events among them. Violence, envy, and even murder lay ahead. 

One cannot help but think of passages of Scripture like Job 4:8, Proverbs 22:8, Hosea 8:7, and Galatians 6:7-8. Each adult in this account resorted to their own wisdom and power, and there were decided consequences as the result! How important for us to trust God, His time, His way, and His plan. Scripture repeatedly shows the problems we cause when we go our own way! I think about my own life, where I have gotten in trouble for the same thing. Rather than trusting God’s will, we exert our own and inevitably pay the price! May we engrave this on our heart: “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and do not lean on your own understanding” (Prov. 3:5).

GENESIS: THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (XXX)

Jacob Gets A Taste Of His Own Medicine (29:1-35)

Neal Pollard

Rebekah urged her son to flee to Haran (27:43), and he arrived in “the land of the sons of the east” (1). Jacob is looking for his mom’s brother, Laban, and he encounters his shepherds tending his thirsty flocks (2-8). Laban’s daughter Rachel, a shepherdess herself, is also with them (9). Jacob assists them by rolling the stone from the well (10). He introduces himself to Rachel, kissing her and telling her their connection as cousins (11-12). Rachel runs back and informs Laban of Jacob’s arrival, news which his uncle welcomes (13-14). Laban extends hospitality to Jacob for the next month while Jacob presumably already begins to work for Laban (14-15). 

We have already received glimpses of character traits in Laban that are on fully display in Genesis 29. As mentioned previously, Laban was not a stranger to materialism (24:29-31,53).  He is always presented by implication as a man striving to get the upper hand or advantage. He is wily enough to win out over a conniving character (Jacob), but he would meet his match with God at a later point (ch. 30). 

When Jacob saw Rachel, he was very attracted to her. We do not know how impressed he was with her personality or spirituality, “but Rachel had a beautiful figure and a lovely face” (17b, NLT). Leah was comparatively plain (17a). There is no doubt to anyone, certainly Laban, that Rachel was the one he desired. Moses highlights this by speaking of Jacob’s “love” for Rachel three times over the next several verses (18-30). 

But, Laban lies to Jacob. He exacts seven years of work from Jacob for the promise of Rachel, then promptly sends Leah into his tent on their wedding night. Jacob unwittingly sleeps with her in the dark. The next morning, he is enraged at being tricked and expresses as much to Laban (25). Laban’s excuse is that their local custom was to marry the eldest daughter before marrying a younger daughter. He gives Rachel to him that week, but requires him to work seven more years for her (28-30). You wonder how many times Jacob considered the irony of being treated the way he treated his brother Esau.

It is interesting to see God’s tender feelings for the spurned Leah. Verse 31 says, “When the LORD saw that Leah was unloved, he enabled her to have children, but Rachel could not conceive” (NLT). Leah gives him four sons, Reuben, Simeon, Levi, and Judah. Each name symbolized her triumph is the spousal war with her sister. Reuben means “see, a son,” Simeon means “unloved” or “hated,” Levi means “attached,” and Judah means “praise the Lord.” Interestingly, the Savior of the world would come through the lesser loved Leah than the physically more beautiful Rachel. 

So many departures from God’s will marked this entire interaction. The polygamy, the deception, the selfish desire, and more. Yet, God’s overarching providence was at work accomplish His will. Jacob is being refined and tested, and we will see the growth and progress. But, we leave him in this chapter working through a domestic boondoggle! 

GENESIS: THESE ARE THE GENERATIONS (XXIX)

Jacob Leaves Home (28:1-22)

Neal Pollard

The sibling rivalry was too heated for Jacob to stay, and everyone knew it. That includes his father, Isaac, who summons him and sends him to the house of his maternal grandfather to get a wife from his Uncle Laban (2). Isaac sends him off with the blessing befitting the one who has the birthright and the blessing, desiring God to multiply and bless him in the way his father and he had received from Him (3-4). So Jacob arises and goes to Paddan-aram (5). Let us consider more carefully the content of the rest of this chapter. 

A Decision (5-9). Esau seems intent on trying to get into his father’s good graces once more. He discerns from his father’s instructions to Jacob that taking a wife from the Canaanites would bode poorly for him (6-8). Thus, the move to take a third wife–this time a daughter of his half-great uncle, Ishmael–undoubtedly is done to please Isaac (9). Esau was the source of his own misfortune, and in at least this part of his life he appears to be scratching and clawing to keep up with his little brother. There is little indication that he is driven by righteous motives. As one put it, “Esau was still Esau”–not a compliment (Spence-Jones, 349)!

A Destination (10-11). Meanwhile, Jacob goes from Beersheba toward Haran to a significant “place” (the word will appear six times in this paragraph). That place is identified in verse 19 as Bethel. The place is important because of the events that occur on this night. I love the observation that “because of the presence of God, this public space becomes the holy, ‘the house of God.’ By morning the ordinary stone will mark a hallowed place. Such is the deity that Jacob worships; the Lord takes the mundane and transforms it into the sacred by his inimitable presence” (Mathews, NAC, Vol. 1B, p. 449). 

A Dream (12-17). Bethel will take on its significance to Jacob because of what happens when he spent the night there. The dream is accompanied with dramatic imagery, a ladder set on earth with its top reaching heaven and angels ascending and descending it (12). With this sight, Jacob hears God say, “I am the Lord, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie, I will give it to you and to your descendants. Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed. Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you (13-15). 

Jacob is given the land and seed promises along with the assurance of divine help through it all. Within the pages of unfolding history, God is executing His eternal plan. With this, He is giving blessed assurance to those weak and struggling human beings that He is with them and blessing them. 

A Dedication (18-22).  The significance of the place and the night is not lost on Jacob. The stone which was his pillow now becomes a pillar set apart to memorialize the event. Jacob pours oil on the stone and makes a vow that if God blesses him and fulfills His promise to him, then the Lord will be his God, the stone will be God’s house (Bethel), and the tithe would be his sacrifice (22). When we see God as He really is for who He really is, worship and service are the only right and logical responses. Praise followed by performance, accentuated by promise! That was Jacob’s resolve. As we come into the presence of the same God today, shouldn’t we be transformed in the same way?

A Tower Reaching Heaven (And Comparative Mythology)

Dale Pollard
Babylon’s Babel 

Sumerian culture talks about a ziggurat dubbed “Etemenanki” and it was hailed as the “House of the Foundation of Heaven and Earth.” It was dedicated to Marduk, a serpentine/dragon deity, and the patron deity of Babylon. It was said to have measured three-hundred feet tall and featuring seven stacked levels.

Famed Assyriologist, George Smith (1840-1876), provided a translation of some Sumerian clay tablets and here’s his brief summary of the inscription: 

“…we have the anger of the gods at the sin of the world, the place mentioned being Babylon. The building or work is called tazimat or tazimtu, a word meaning strong, and there is a curious relation, lines 9 to 11, that what they built in the day the god destroyed in the night.”
(The Chaldean Account of Genesis, 1876, p. 162).

Egypt’s Babel 

A portion of the Qur’an makes a few claims that resemble the legendary biblical tower— save a few key differences. In the Islamic story, the event takes place in Egypt and the Pharaoh orders a minister named Haman to build a tower that reaches the heavens.

Mexico’s Babel 

Pedro de los Rios, writing sometime before 1565:

“Before the great inundation which took place 4,800 years after the erection of the world, the country of Anahuac was inhabited by giants, all of whom either perished in the inundation or were transformed into fishes, save seven who fled into caverns. When the waters subsided, one of the giants, called Xelhua, surnamed the ‘Architect,’ went to Cholula, where, as a memorial of the Tlaloc which had served for an asylum to himself and his six brethren, he built an artificial hill in the form of a pyramid. He ordered bricks to be made in the province of Tlalmanalco, at the foot of the Sierra of Cecotl, and in order to convey them to Cholula he placed a file of men who passed them from hand to hand. The gods beheld, with wrath, an edifice the top of which was to reach the clouds. Irritated at the daring attempt of Xelhua, they hurled fire on the pyramid. Numbers of the workmen perished. The work was discontinued, and the monument was afterwards dedicated to Quetzalcoatl.”
(Mexico as it is and was, 1844, Brantz Mayer, p. 28)

Non-Canonical Coincidences 

In the Greek Apocalypse of Baruch (written between the 1st-3rd Cen.) we find a description of the condition of Jerusalem after the sack by Nebuchadnezzar.

The Greek Apocalypse details a vision of Baruch ben Neriah and in it he sees the punishment of the builders of the “tower of strife against God,” which sounds remarkably similar  to the Tower of Babel.

Abydenus (a Greek historian of the mid-fourth century B.C.), as quoted by Eusebius, spoke of a great tower at Babylon which was destroyed. The record notes:

“[U]ntil this time all men had used the same speech, but now there was sent upon them a confusion of many and divers tongues”

Josephus, the Jewish historian, quoting from an ancient source, records these words:

“When all men were of one language, some of them built a tower, as if they would thereby ascend up to heaven, but the gods sent storms of wind and overthrew the tower, and gave every one his peculiar language; and for this reason it was that the city was called Babylon”

(Antiquities of the Jews, 1.4.3).

THE TRUTH BEHIND THE TOWER 

While we don’t need the extra biblical evidence and anecdotes to prove what God already told us, it’s certainly interesting and faith-building to discover. We shouldn’t forget the main message of His account. When humans are united we’re either powerfully wicked or powerfully righteous. The top of our metaphorical towers will either touch heaven or hell and the end result depends on what we’ve decided to unite under. If Christ is on the banner we fly then we’ll find success. If pride, greed, or any other selfish ambition brings us together— that tower will inevitably fall.  

The Birth of Behemoth-Buildings 

First to Scrape The Sky: 

The first skyscraper was built in Chicago by William LeBaron Jenney in 1885. While that nine story structure no longer stands, many skyscrapers from that time period remain.

King of the Towers: 

The Burj Khalia in Dubai is the tallest building in the world— standing at 2,717 feet tall. 

Jenney’s “Home Insurance Building” (demolished in 1932 to make room for a larger building)

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXVIII)

Sibling Rivalry (27:1-46)

Neal Pollard

In the narrative of Jacob and Esau, the events of Genesis 27 are the ones best-known by Bible students. It reveals a character study in this order: Isaac, Rebekah, Jacob, and Esau. It paints a picture of dysfunction, a remarkable truth given how God works through this family to accomplish His eternal purpose. 

Isaac: Limited Vision (1-4)

Isaac is described as old and in the dark concerning the day of his death. He wants to give a blessing to Esau, so he urges him to go kill some game and prepare it for him so his soul would be stirred. Kenneth Mathews could be right when he opines, “Isaac’s blindness functions at the metaphorical level for the man’s spiritual condition when he preferred Esau for his tasty cuisine” (NAC, Vol. 1B, 427). But his literal visual impairment plays a key role in the events of this chapter. 

Rebekah: Biased Intrusion (5-17)

Rebekah overhears Isaac’s request and plots against her eldest son with her youngest son. She constructs the plan and prompts Jacob to follow it. Jacob expresses his qualms and hesitation about being found out, but Rebekah says, “Your curse be on me, my son; only obey my voice, and go, get them for me” (13). Notice she asks Jacob to steal the blessing for her! How many times have parents used their children as pawns for their selfish desires? She deceives as much as Jacob, devising his disguise and cooking the food. It was not her place to “butt in,” but she did.

Jacob: Premeditated Deception (18-30)

Jacob goes in wearing hairy garments and carrying the food to his father. He lies and tells his father he is Esau. Despite how quickly he had returned and how his voice was not disguised, because he felt like Esau and brought the game Isaac asked for he gave the blessing to Jacob. Isaac asked him a second time if he was Esau (24), and again Jacob lies. After feeling and smelling Jacob, convinced that he is Esau, he says, “Now may God give you of the dew of heaven, And of the fatness of the earth, And an abundance of grain and new wine; May peoples serve you, And nations bow down to you; Be master of your brothers, And may your mother’s sons bow down to you. Cursed be those who curse you, And blessed be those who bless you” (28-29). Jacob beats a hasty retreat.

Esau: Unrighteous Indignation (31-46)

On the heels of Jacob’s departure, Esau returns. Both figure out quickly that Jacob had stolen Esau’s blessing. Isaac trembled violently (33) and Esau cries “with an exceedingly great and bitter cry” (34). He finds out that he cannot receive the “firstborn” blessing. Despair begins to turn to derision and displeasure as Esau says, “Is he not rightly named Jacob, for he has supplanted me these two times? He took away my birthright, and behold, now he has taken away my blessing” (36). Isaac cannot extend the blessing, but can only say, “By your sword you shall live, And your brother you shall serve; But it shall come about when you become restless, That you will break his yoke from your neck” (40). Esau bore a grudge against Jacob (41) and planned to kill him (42). He was full of fury and anger (44-45).

Of course, God was at work through this situation. In His sovereignty, God chose to bring about the seed promise through Jacob rather than Esau. As Paul later observes, “And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, it was said to her, ‘The older will serve the younger.’ Just as it is written, ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.’ What shall we say then? There is no injustice with God, is there? May it never be. For He says to Moses, ‘I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.’ So then it does not depend on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy” (Rom. 9:10-16).

We may struggle to reconcile such choice with the consummate fairness and perfection of God’s character, but the explanation is there in Paul’s discussion. Jacob did not earn this favor. God put the emphasis on His call and His will. He is the One (the only one) who has the right to exert His purpose and plan to achieve His desired outcome. He did not interfere with the free will of either boy, but knowing their inclinations and foreknowing their choices worked through them to achieve His objective. Ultimately, that would mean the salvation of the world by bringing His Son into it through the nation that would spring from Jacob. 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXVII)

Isaac Travels Familiar Ground (26:1-34)

Neal Pollard

This chapter records three major incidents in the life of Isaac, and it most clearly reveals the character, the ups and downs on this man than any other in Scripture. The content of Genesis 26 can be divided geographically, with his sojourn in Gerar (1-16), his settlement in the valley of Gerar (17-22), and finally his move to Beersheba (23-35). Something significant happens in each location.

GERAR

According to Genesis 24:62 and 25:11, Isaac lived in Beer-lahai-roi from before his marriage to Rebekah all the way up to the time of the famine recorded in Genesis 26:1. This forced Isaac and his family to move in search of food. They came to Gerar (1), where they would have a familiar encounter.  Given the passage of time, we have to assume that “Abimelech” was a title rather than a personal name. Almost a century of time has passed from Abraham’s contact with Abimelech (20:1ff) and this incident. I think Kenneth Mathews explanation is best, that “the name “Abimelech,” meaning ‘my father is king,’ may be a throne name among the rulers at Gerar, as in Egypt’s practice of ‘pharaoh'” (NAC, Vol. 1B, 403). 

He arrives in the same place, encounters a ruler with the same name, is forced to go for the same reason (famine), and makes the same foolish decision as the father. While the events of chapter 20 occurred before his birth, Isaac responds to his crisis of faith strikingly similar to Abraham. Isn’t it interesting that his deception of Abimelech followed the Lord’s appearance and promise to Isaac (2-5). Isaac arrives in Gerar having heard the direction to avoid Egypt and the assurance that He would multiply his descendants, give him this land, and bless all nations through his seed.

“Beautiful” Rebekah (7; 24:16) caught the eye of the locals. Fearful, Isaac traded the same lie his father did concerning his wife by saying she was his sister. This ruse went on for “a long time” (8) until Abimelech witnessed an interaction between Isaac and Rebekah that revealed unmistakably that they were not brother and sister (8). As Abimelech had done with Abraham, Isaac is reprimanded for his deception (10) but also protected from harm (11). Isaac prospers “a hundredfold” that year, blessed by God abundantly (12-14). This did not sit well with the envious Philistines, who in spite filled all his father’s wells with earth (15). 

Abimelech recognizes how God is blessing Isaac, and the Philistine king suggests this powerful man leave their city (16). So, in Gerar we see the grace and generosity of God even with a man struggling with his faith and character. We see the integrity of God, keeping the promise He made to Abraham and reiterating it with Isaac. We see the purpose of God, equipping Isaac for what is to come through the man’s prosperity and power. 

THE VALLEY

Isaac hoped to avoid turmoil and conflict by descending into the valley below Gerar. He re-digs the wells his father had dug and the Philistines had later stopped up (18). Twice, Isaac’s servants dig wells only to have them contested by the locals who claimed the water should be theirs (19-21). Isaac named those wells “contention” and “enmity.” Finally, they dig a well in a completely different area of the valley. This one was not contested, and Isaac named it “Rehoboth” (“broad places”), declaring, “At last the Lord has made room for us, and we will be fruitful in the land” (22). 

This incident in Isaac’s life reveals a strength of character all too rare in the world. He pursued peace, even in the face of aggression. The Philistines goaded him by stopping up his wells, so he leaves them. The inhabitants of the valley contest not one but two of the wells his servants went to the effort to dig, but Isaac peacefully withdraws and eventually digs a well which is uncontested. The late Wendell Winkler once remarked, “He practiced the Sermon On The Mount many hundreds of years before it was given (Matt. 5:38-48). 

BEERSHEBA

Here, Isaac imitates his father’s faith. God appears to Isaac at the place where his father made a covenant with Abimelech and instituted public worship (21:31-33). Now, Isaac is going to enter into covenant with Abimelech after instituting public worship in the same village (25). Abimelech experiences a change of heard regarding Isaac, no doubt swayed by the way God was blessing this patriarch (26-29). They feast together, make oaths to one another, and as icing on the cake his servants find water there. They call the well “Shibah” (“seven” or “full”). 

Do you see an interesting parallel in how this chapter ends with how our own lives can go? Life is definitely going Isaac’s way, spiritually, socially, and materially. He has gained a hard-fought peace with his powerful neighbors. He is worshipping the right God in the right way and is growing and maturing his faith. His financial portfolio is exploding! However, he is battling domestic issues with a son who brings them grief (35). As long as we are in this fallen world, we will be on some sort of roller coaster. Joy will often and regularly be dampened by heartache and disappointment. What Adam and Eve lost in Eden will not be restored on this earth or in this life! We can be faithful overcomers, but we cannot avoid the proverbial wisdom of Job that “man, who is born of woman, is short-lived and full of turmoil” (14:1). 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXVI)

The Generations Of Ishmael And Isaac (25:1-34)

Neal Pollard

Genesis: These Are The Generations

The Generations Of Ishmael And Isaac (25:1-34)

Neal Pollard

Here at what we might consider the halfway point of the book of Genesis we read about the death of Abraham. Before his death, he remarried. Her name was Keturah, and she bore him six sons (2). Everybody remembers Ishmael and Isaac, but what about Zimran and Jokshan and Medan and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah (2)? Moses gives a short genealogical record of his descendants through Keturah. It is clear that Abraham became the father of many nations.

It also appears that Keturah is considered a “concubine” alongside Hagar in the inspired record, given the statement in verse six. Whether he had other concubines we do not know. But an impressive table of nations emanates from Abraham’s lineage, which James Smith reveals in one of his trusty charts:

We will see many of these peoples and nations later in Scripture.

Abraham dies an old man (175) and satisfied with life, and he is buried by Ishmael and Isaac alongside his wife in the cave of Machpelah (7-10). The focus now turns to Isaac (11), but only after Moses gives a genealogical account of Ishmael’s descendants (25:12-18). Note at the end of this record, when speaking of their settling to the east and south, that the text says, “he settled in defiance of all his relative” (18b). That entire verse shows the beginning of the fulfillment of Genesis 16:12. Watching current events, we would concur that this Scripture continues to be fulfilled today by Ishmael’s descendants!

Pursuing his examination of the seed promise given to Abraham, Moses is moved to rivet his attention on Isaac. We’re told Isaac’s age (40) at the time of his marriage to Rebekah (v. 20). They would be married 20 years before they have children (26). We’re told that Rebekah is an Aramean (20). Aram (or, Paddanaram) is approximately in the area of modern-day Damascus, Syria. We will see the Arameans intersect with the Jews throughout Old Testament history from Balak (Num. 23:7) to David’s subjugation of them (2 Sam. 8:6) to Ahab’s war with them (1 Ki. 22:1ff). 

History will repeat itself with Isaac and Rebekah experiencing some of what his parents went through. While her struggle is condensed into only one verse, Rebekah was barren (21). Isaac intercedes for her, and she becomes pregnant with twins (21-22). She has a difficult pregnancy! The Lord appears to her, explaining, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the older shall serve the younger” (23). Perhaps this revelation to her influences the favoritism she shows the “younger” (28). 

Foreshadowing of troubles to come emerge literally from before their births. Esau is born first, but Jacob (“supplanter”) is grasping his heel (26). The boys are a study in contrast. Esau is a hunter and the favorite of his father. Jacob is a homebody and the favorite of his mother. Esau is also revealed to be an impetuous young man, selling his birthright for bread and red lentil stew. Esau is nicknamed “Edom” (red), and his descendants will be the bane of Israel’s existence on numerous occasions. 

The writer of Hebrews offers Esau as a cautionary tale for those who would rashly abandon Christ. He urges, “See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled; that there be no immoral or godless person like Esau, who sold his own birthright for a single meal. For you know that even afterwards, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no place for repentance, though he sought for it with tears” (Heb. 12:15-17). Do not let the pull of this temporary world cause you to give us what is infinitely greater and better! 

Through the genealogies, Moses is marching us through the important establishment of the covenant with the very people through whom the Messiah would one day come! So many questions we might have in the New Testament are explained by a careful reading of the first book of the Bible. And they are written for our learning (Rom. 15:4). 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXV)

Finding The Right Wife (24:1-67)

Neal Pollard

The spiritual growth of Abraham was so incredible that, though God had blessed him so much in a material sense, he is burdened about finding Isaac a wife God would approve of (1-9). Abraham makes his servant swear by the God of heaven that he would assist him in finding his son a wife in keeping with the promises and protections he had received from the Lord. Abraham expected divine guidance and providence in the process (7-8).

Abraham’s servant sets out on this mission endowed with material goods and livestock for use in luring a potential bride and her family (10-11). Perhaps Gideon later would have had privy to the plan of this servant, or perhaps the practice of seeking a non-miraculous sign of God’s providence was common among the ancients. But, he prays for Isaac’s wife to be the woman who voluntarily draws water not just him but also for the camels (12-14). God answers his prayer while he’s still praying it, and her name was Rebekah. Rebekah is described as beautiful (16), sexually pure (16), and servant-hearted (17-21). Despite God clearly sending what he asked for, the servant still ponders whether or not it was God’s hand (21). What a reminder of the importance to ask God in faith with nothing wavering (Js. 1:6). 

The servants wants to know about her family, and what she tells him causes him to know that not only is she from Abraham’s homeland, but that she is related (22-24). Any doubt he had about God’s intervention is resolved, and “the man bowed low and worshipped the Lord” (26). He exclaimed, “Blessed be the Lord, the God of my master Abraham, who has not forsaken His lovingkindness and His truth toward my master; as for me, the Lord has guided me in the way to the house of my master’s brothers” (27). We are impressed that either Abraham cherished this servant because of his faith, or his faith flourished because he was exposed to the example of Abraham–or maybe it was both. 

Rebekah reports this exchange to her mother’s household. Her brother, Laban, becomes her representative and spokesman. What we come to learn of his character, ultimately, makes us wonder if his angle is financial more than spiritual. The text mentions that he saw the lavish gifts on her wrist before he heard her report (30). Laban welcomes Abraham’s servant, whose motives seem much nobler. Before he will eat or relax after his long journey, the servant recounts the details of his mission and the events that had just transpired (31-49).

Rebekah’s father, Bethuel, and brother are quick to confirm this as providential (50), and they are ready to offer Rebekah in exchange for the gold, silver, and garments for her benefit, and also “precious things to her brother and to her mother” (53). Abraham’s servant worships God again (52). The servant and the men with him enjoy their hospitality, but they are ready to return to Abraham the next day (54). Despite Rebekah’s family’s request that she remain for up to ten days, the servant is anxious to return. The family let Rebekah decide, and she is ready to immediately go (55-59). Her family blesses her and sends her off (60-61).

Isaac and Rebekah’s meeting might even be classified as romantic. Isaac is meditating in the field as she comes in the procession at the close of day. Curious, he walks toward the caravan. She veils herself as they meet, “then Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and he took Rebekah, and she became his wife, and he loved her; thus Isaac was comforted after his mother’s death” (67). 

Isn’t this one of the purest, most inspiring love stories not only in Scripture but in recorded history? A father who placed his son’s spiritual well-being above his portfolio or prestige. A man who trusts his father’s efforts to bless his life. A woman who prepared herself for vast blessings through a lifetime of humble service. A servant who depended on God every step of the way to play his part to get them together. And a God who at work the whole time. Isaac was devastated by his mother’s death, yet comforted by the wife God gave him. 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXIV)

Sarah Dies (23:1-20)

Neal Pollard

In our modern world where women typically outlive their husbands, we may find it surprising that Abraham will outlive Sarah by nearly a half century. “The years of the life of Sarah” were 127 (1). She dies in Hebron, in the land their descendants would one day own, and Abraham mourned her loss (2). Afterward, he had practical matters to settle (3). He approaches “the sons of Heth,” descended from Canaan (10:15) and the ancestors of the Hittites. In Scripture, they are typically allies of Israel rather than enemies (2 Sa. 11:3; 2 Ki. 7:6; 2 Chr. 1:17). 

Perhaps it is an overlooked evidence of faith that Abraham wants to buy a burial place in the land promised to but not yet possessed by him (4). Throughout Genesis, we will see more and more of Abraham’s family buried there–Abraham (25:9), Isaac and Rebekah (49:30-31), and Jacob (50:13). After the conquest, Hebron would belong to the inheritance of the nation descended from Abraham.

These proto-Hittites first propose one of their own tombs, but Abraham wants a place of his own that he does not have to share with these generous people (4-6). Not only that, but Abraham names the place, the cave of Machpelah, which he wants to buy from their presumed leader, Ephron (7-9). Ephron wishes to give the cave as a gift to Abraham, but the patriarch wants ownership to be clear for subsequent generations (10-13). Is there a bit of horse-trading humor when, after saying he would give it to Abraham, Ephron says when pressed, “My lord, listen to me; a piece of land worth four hundred shekels of silver, what is that between me and you? So bury your dead” (15). Abraham was listening (16), and paid the full price and was given the deed to the field and the cave along with all the trees in the field (17-20).

By burying his wife there and buying the land, Abraham was making a small downpayment on a place that would someday belong to the nation descending from him. This wife, Sarah, is remembered as really an ideal model for all wives in 1 Peter 3:1-6. She was submissive and obedient to her husband, she did what was right, and she was courageous. The writer of Hebrews likewise exalts her faith to believe that at 90 years old she could become a first-time mother (Heb. 11:11). Her loss was a source of grief and mourning to Abraham. Despite their inevitable foibles and faults, they were a “power couple”! They were driven together by a partnership that embraced the promises of God and “being fully assured that what God had promised, He was also able to perform” (Rom. 4:21). 

Genesis: These Are The Generations (XXIII)

Sacrificing Blessings (22:1-24)

Neal Pollard

Not only is this chapter probably the best-known concerning Abraham’s life, but it is an event repeatedly reflected upon by New Testament writers. Abraham is mentioned 76 times in the New Testament, and this event is explicitly mentioned in Hebrews 11 and James 2. It is definitely a turning point in Abraham’s relationship with God. God has been abundantly supplying Abraham with blessings, the chief of which is this son of promise. Now, God asks Abraham to make a sacrifice for Him. It is called a “test” (1), and any of us can imagine how great a trial it was!

We see the specifics of the test (1-2). God tells Abraham to take his promised son, Isaac, go to the land of Moriah, and offer him as a burnt offering at the spot designated by God. None of these variables could be bypassed or substituted. God gives the place, the item, and the nature of the sacrifice. Of course, we will see Moriah again–first as the site of the temple (2 Chron. 3:1) and later as the site of the cross since Jesus was crucified outside the gates of Jerusalem. Moriah is established early on as the place of important sacrifice and it is always a place where faith is put to the test. 

We see Abraham’s submission to the test. Abraham’s response is almost unfathomable! There is no argument, rationalizing, or protest recorded; instead, Abraham rises early and sets out to obey the rigorous commands of this test (3-5). There is a steadfast determination to obey God from the moment Abraham hears up to the moment he attempts to finish the task (10). 

We see his struggle to complete the test. First, we see it intuitively. Abraham is asked by his God to make Isaac a burnt offering. What he knows and has learned of God seems at odds with the requirement.  Then, there is the physical struggle of the three days’ journey and the climb up Mt. Moriah. All three days are spent walking with Isaac along with his servants. Further, there is the innocent question Isaac has about the specific nature of the sacrifice–Scripture is silent about Abraham’s reply. 

We see his strength in passing the test. Abraham gets to the place God told him about, builds the altar, binds his son, and attempts to slay him (9-10). What fueled the strength is faith (Heb. 11:17-19), and what proved the strength was his faith working (Js. 2:21-22). Forever, the Jews would honor Abraham for such faith and afterward Christians would call for an imitation of such strong faith. 

We see God’s supply in “grading” the test. Reading subsequent statements from God about child sacrifice (Deut. 18:10; 2 Ki. 17:17; Jer. 32:35) and understanding the nature and character of God throughout Scripture, we can look in retrospect and anticipate that God would not allow Abraham to go through with this. Instead, God provides a substitute sacrifice for Abraham (12-13). In fact, Abraham will name the place “Jehovah Jireh” (The Lord will provide)(14). See his faith, promising Isaac on the way up Moriah, saying, “God will provide for Himself the lamb for the burnt offering, my son” (8). At that time, Abraham could not foresee how but he trusted God. May we always remember that through our tests!

The divine supply continues after the ram is offered. The angel of the Lord (the preincarnate Christ who knows that on this spot much later His Father would not stop His being a sacrifice), who stopped the slaying (12) and commended his faith (12), speaks a second time from heaven and reiterates the future blessings Abraham would receive in the land promise (16-17) and the seed promise (18). 

NOTE:

I found a breakdown of this chapter in my Logos Bible software, from a chapel delivered several years ago by Mike Vestal at the Bear Valley Bible Institute. It is a great analysis of the text, with wonderful application. He points out that we have:

  • A call (1)–“Abraham”
  • A response (1)–“Here I am”
  • A command (2)–“Take…go…offer”
  • A response (3)–Six action verbs (beginning with “So Abraham rose…”)
  • Worship (5)–“We will worship…”
  • Preparation for sacrifice (6-10)–Six more action verbs
  • A call (11)–“Abraham! Abraham!”
  • A response (11)–“Her I am”
  • A command (12)–“Do not stretch…do nothing to the lad”
  • Worship (13)–“Abraham went and took the ram and offered him”

His provocative application is, “When God asks you to sacrifice blessings, are you willing to sacrifice?” Our faith will be tested, and when it is we must trust in God’s character and promises. When God reveals His will, we should obey without delay or complaint. When God has spoken, we must not only act but also worship. When we hold back, God blesses more than we ever thought possible. I especially love the observation that Abraham so loved his God that he gave his only son. 

So, Abraham returns to Beersheba with his heart and life revolutionized by this incredible test. His obedience is lauded (18b). His faith is vindicated (5 + 19). Moses rounds off the chapter by giving us the family line from which Rebekah, Isaac’s wife-to-be, will appear.