The History of Christmas: How Christendom Came to Celebrate Christ’s Birth

Brent Pollard

Consider for a moment how we came to stand where we are. The manger scene feels ancient—as though Christendom has always paused each December to marvel at the incarnation. Yet history reveals something startling: the first Christians never celebrated Christmas.

This is not a scandal but a testimony. The cherished celebration emerged slowly, like dawn breaking over centuries, as believers reflected deeply on what it means that God became man. What began as an unobserved event in Bethlehem became a worldwide moment of worship—not by apostolic command, but through man’s appreciation of glory made flesh.

The New Testament: A Conspicuous Silence on Annual Celebration

Matthew and Luke give us the nativity accounts with luminous detail: angelic announcements, shepherds startled in the night, magi following a star. These chapters overflow with wonder. Then the narrative rushes forward to Jesus’ ministry, His cross, His resurrection, His return.

What’s missing? Any instruction to celebrate His birth annually.

The apostles gathered on the first day of the week, remembering Christ’s death and resurrection through the Lord’s Supper. They proclaimed His gospel with urgency. But they left no pattern, no command, no practice for memorializing His birth each year. This was not oversight—it was simply not their focus.

Early Christianity: Avoiding Birthday Traditions

The earliest believers lived in a world where birthdays carried pagan associations. Jewish tradition paid little attention to such celebrations, and Roman birthday customs often intertwined with idolatrous practices. As a result, Christians in the first two centuries steered clear of birthday observances entirely—even Jesus’ birthday.

Origen, writing in the third century, expressed the prevailing sentiment: only the birthdays of sinners like Pharaoh and Herod were celebrated in Scripture. The righteous did not.

This wasn’t legalism. It was discernment. God’s people were learning to walk differently in a pagan world, careful not to blur the lines between sacred and profane.

The Growing Curiosity: When Was Christ Born?

By the late second and early third centuries, Christian scholars began asking a natural question:

When, exactly, was Jesus born?

Their calculations varied widely—March, May, November—but the question itself signaled something important. These believers were not merely theologians; they were people falling deeper in love with the incarnation. To wonder about the timing of His birth was to treasure it.

Yet even then, no feast day emerged. The curiosity was intellectual, not liturgical.

December 25: The First Christmas Celebration

The earliest solid evidence for celebrating Christ’s birth on December 25 appears in a Roman calendar from around AD 336. Why this date?

Two theories dominate:

Theological Calculation: Some early Christians believed Jesus was conceived on the same date He died—March 25. Counting forward nine months places His birth on December 25.

Cultural Context: December 25 fell near Roman festivals like Sol Invictus (the ‘Unconquered Sun’) and Saturnalia. Choosing this date may have offered believers a Christian alternative to pagan revelry, declaring boldly that the true Light has come into the world.

Both explanations reflect the church’s dual task: theological precision and cultural engagement. The church was not absorbing paganism—it was confronting it with truth.

East Meets West: Different Dates, Same Savior

While the West settled on December 25, Eastern Christians initially observed Christ’s birth on January 6, called Theophany or Epiphany. By the fifth century, most Eastern congregations also adopted December 25 for the nativity, reserving January 6 for celebrating Christ’s baptism and the revelation of His divine identity.

This convergence is instructive. Though separated by geography and culture, believers across the empire felt the same pull—to set aside a day each year to contemplate the mystery Paul described:

‘Great indeed is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh’ (1 Timothy 3:16).

The Medieval Church: Layering Tradition on Truth

As Christianity shaped Europe’s cultures through the Middle Ages, Christmas absorbed many traditions: nativity plays dramatizing the Bethlehem scene, carols sung in village streets, gift-giving recalling the magi’s offerings, and evergreen decorations symbolizing eternal life.

These additions were not corruptions. They were expressions—imperfect, human, sometimes misguided—of a truth too glorious to contain in words alone. The church has always been a community of storytellers, and Christmas became the story believers told again and again, in every creative form available.

The Reformation: Christmas Under Scrutiny

When the Reformation arrived, Christmas faced fresh examination. Lutherans and Anglicans embraced the celebration as a legitimate way to honor Christ’s incarnation. Puritans, however, rejected it, viewing Christmas as an invention unmoored from Scripture.

Both positions reflected sincere convictions about how to honor God. The Puritans feared idolatry and human tradition; the Lutherans treasured gospel proclamation wherever it appeared.

Modern Christmas: Sacred Truth Meets Cultural Expression

From the 1800s onward, Christmas continued to evolve. Charles Dickens’ writings awakened social conscience, Santa Claus captured children’s imaginations, and commercialization introduced both celebration and distraction.

Today’s Christmas is a complex blend: nativity scenes beside reindeer, worship services near shopping frenzies, profound theological truth intertwined with consumer excess.

Conclusion: Celebrating the Incarnation

Christmas is not commanded in Scripture. The apostles did not practice it. Its date may be symbolic rather than historical. Yet it endures because it points to something utterly real:

God became man.

In Bethlehem, divinity clothed itself in human flesh. The infinite became finite—the eternal entered time. The Creator took the form of a creature. This is the heartbeat of Christianity—not merely that God loves us, but that He came to us.

John wrote it plainly:

‘The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth’ (John 1:14).

So whether we observe Christmas or not, let us never stop marveling at what happened in Bethlehem. Let us preach it, sing it, tell it to our children and our neighbors. Let us declare with unshakable confidence that God has acted in history, that heaven has invaded earth, and that nothing will ever be the same.

This is the glory of the incarnation—and it deserves to be celebrated every single day.

A Simple Way To Identify The Church Jesus Started 

Tuesday’s Column: Dale Mail

IMG_1381

Dale Pollard

There are just too many voices in the world today muddying the waters when it comes to 21st century Christianity. In fact the term, “Christianity,” doesn’t mean much the average person. In fact, the average person will most likely have several friends who carry this title and they know based on their morals— they’re not really different. Sadly it’s a description that doesn’t describe much, other than an individual that believes in God. That’s really it! This word has been tragically stripped of what we understand to be the most rewarding life you could possibly live. There’s simply no higher calling, there is no greater purpose in life, and you just can’t beat the retirement plan. 

Now let’s do something to help the seeking world out. 

Let’s make it our priority to understand the church in such a way that we can simplify her mission and her origin. 

Here are two terms that will help:

  1. The term “restoration” may sound similar to “reformation”, but the two terms could not be more contrary to each other. Restoration is an attempt to return the church to the pattern we find in the New Testament, while reformation is a changing of what currently exists. It’s a modification or addition which creates something new entirely. The Old Testament is filled with the pleas of the prophets for the people to restore their relationships with God. 

    2.  The definition of the word “denomination” is evidence that restoration is not only possible, but needed. Denomination, in the religious world, describes a branch off of an  original. Any branch coming off of the New Testament church, is simply not it. 

Five Facts About The Lord’s Church 

  1. The New Testament church was established by Jesus, not Luther, Henry the 8th, Calvin, Smith, or Wesley
  2. The New Testament church was established in Jerusalem, not Oxford, London, or Amsterdam
  3. In New Testament times people were told to believe in Jesus, repent of their sins,  be baptized by a total immersion of water, and to live faithfully (Acts 2:38, 16:30-31, 2:16, Mark 16:15-16; Romans 6:1-4; Revelation 2:10) 
  4. Christians in the New Testament met on the first day of the week to partake in the Lord’s Supper (Acts 20:7)
  5. The New Testament church was a united church, while denominationalism is, by its very nature, divided. 

If the church you are a part of can say the same, you can be confident that it is the church that Jesus established. If this is not what the church you are a part of teaches and practices, then perhaps this will be some information that will help you begin a life-changing search to find God’s will for your life. 

 

A Simple Way To Identify The Church Jesus Started 

Tuesday’s Column: Dale Mail

image

Dale Pollard

 

There are just too many voices in the world today muddying the waters when it comes to 21st Century Christianity. In fact, the term “Christianity” doesn’t mean much to the average person. In fact, the average person will most likely have several friends who carry this title and they know based on their morals— they’re not really different. Sadly it’s a description that doesn’t describe much, other than an individual that believes in God. This word has been tragically stripped of what is the most rewarding life you could possibly live. There’s simply no higher calling, there is no greater purpose in life, and you just can’t beat the retirement plan.

Now let’s do something to help the seeking world out.

Let’s make it our priority to understand the church in such a way that we can simplify her mission and her origin.

Here are two terms that will help

  1. The term “restoration” may sound similar to “reformation”, but the two terms could not be more contrary to each other. Restoration is an attempt to restore the church to the pattern we find in the New Testament, while reformation is a reforming of what currently exists. It’s a modification or addition which creates something new entirely. The Old Testament is filled with the pleas of the prophets for the people to restore their relationships with God.

2.  The definition of the word “denomination” is evidence that restoration is not only    possible, but needed. Denomination, in the religious world, describes a branch off of an  original. Any branch coming off of the New Testament church, is simply not it.

Five Facts About The Lord’s Church

  1. The NT church was established by Jesus, not Luther, Henry the 8th, Calvin, Smith, or Wesley
  2. The NT church was established in Jerusalem, not Oxford, London, or Amsterdam
  3. In NT times people were told to believe in Jesus, repent of their sins,  be baptized by a total immersion of water, and to live faithfully (Acts 2:38, 16:30-31, 2:16, Mark 16:15-16)
  4. Christians in the NT met on the first day of the week to partake of the Lord’s Supper, Acts 20:7
  5. The NT church was a united church, while denominationalism is, by it’s very nature, divided.

If the church you are a part of can say the same, you can be confident that it is the church that Jesus established. If this is not what the church you are a part of teaches and practices, then perhaps this will be some information that will help you begin a life changing search to find God’s will for your life.

church

“Redemption Is Tailor-Made For The Wretched”

Neal Pollard

If you did not know the source of this quote already, you might be hard-pressed to guess it.  This was said by Stanley “Tookie” Williams, two weeks before he was executed in California in 2005 for four 1979 murders he committed while the apparent leader of The Crips gang in Los Angeles.  Though he vehemently proclaimed his innocence in these deaths to the very end, he freely admitted that drugs, robbery, gang- violence and other crimes were very much a part of his life before prison.  Redemption, as he understood it, “is not predicated on color or race or social stratum or one’s religious background.  It’s accessible for everybody. That’s the beauty about it” (interview with Amy Goodman, WBAI). Williams, who became a prolific author of anti-gang books while on death row, has left behind enough writing to indicate he did not have a biblical understanding of redemption, which is truly tragic because the ideas quoted are certainly biblical.

The word “wretched” is used “of a person in a very unhappy or unfortunate state” (New Oxford American Dictionary, online).  The New Testament uses the word twice.  Interestingly, the first time it is used by one who was all-too-aware of his wretchedness, but who rejoiced at the possibility of redemption (Rom. 7:24-25).  The second time it is used by a church, Laodicea, who didn’t know they were wretched but were told by Christ they were (Rev. 3:17). A form of the word is also used in another place, where Christians struggling with worldliness are told to be wretched over their sinful lifestyle (Jas. 4:9, see ESV).  The common thread between these verses is that wretchedness is related to redemption.  One must recognize their unfortunate state if they hope to be redeemed.

One of the great ironies of life is that so many are racked with guilt but are also skilled in justifying and defending the very behavior that produces it.  Many others rest in their confident belief that they are, overall, good and moral people who don’t really need redemption.  To deny or rationalize the sin in our life will cause our most imposing problem to remain unresolved.  To humble ourselves and admit our wretchedness apart from Christ can lead us to redemption. It doesn’t matter your race, color, income level, or background.  Redemption is tailor-made for the wretched!

SOLA SCRIPTURA?

Neal Pollard

Pythagoras is said to have been the earliest outside of Scripture (Isa. 40:22) to contend that the earth is round. He did not make the earth round with his assertions, but identified what already was.  Sir Isaac Newton certainly did not create gravity, but he is credited for our modern understanding of it.  Likewise, the term “sola scriptura” is not found in scripture (similar to terms like “trinity” and “omniscience”), but it was coined during the “Reformation Movement” as part of Martin Luther’s protests against perceived corruptions of the Catholic Church.  It was a “Latin phrase (literally ‘by Scripture alone’) describing the Protestant theological principle that Scripture is the final norm in all judgments of faith and practice. Church traditions and customs, pronouncements of church officials, civil law or any other purely human source, including human reason, must yield to clear scriptural pronouncements” (Reid, Daniel G., et al.  Dictionary of Christianity in America, 1990: n.p.).  Did the Protestant Reformers, who, incidentally, got unfortunately got so many things wrong, originate that idea?  Because they were wrong on many doctrinal conclusions, does that automatically make the idea of “sola Scriptura” incorrect? It seems to me that at least three questions are in order regarding this subject.

What does “by Scripture alone” mean?

It means that the Bible does not share authority with anyone or anything else.  One author says it meant “’the freedom of Scripture to rule as God’s word in the church, disentangled from papal and ecclesiastical magisterium and tradition.’ It viewed the Word as supreme over tradition and the sacraments” (McArthur, John. Expository Preaching, 1992. Dallas: Word Pub., 47). A creed book, discipline, or annual church conference may vote and decide about what a religious group’s view on a matter should be.  They may even change their view from a previously held, correct view.  Or, a religious group may claim to have received latter day revelation and may produce a book they claim to be co-authoritative with the Bible.  Or, they may say “the church” and “church tradition” is co-authoritative.  The idea of “by Scripture alone” rejects competing or co-authoritative standards.

It does not eliminate the need to “handle aright” or involve hermeneutics (the science of interpretation).  That is a cognitive necessity.  You cannot read even the simplest of instructions or follow the most basic of tasks without employing logic, reason, and deduction.  That is not the same thing as a person, group, or book that claims to rival or co-authorize with Scripture.

What is the alternative?

That question has really already been answered.  The alternative is to suggest that Scripture alone is insufficient or inadequate, that is not the sole authority on matters of truth and right.  Some would even call the idea of following only Scripture as destructive heresy. Yet, the alternative to Scripture alone is Scripture along with something else, whether a man, group, council, church, or governing body.

Why is it so important?

This is the crux of the matter.  Scripture is God-breathed, making one spiritually complete (2 Tim. 3:16-17).  If Scripture is sufficient, what need is there for anything beyond it?  On what basis would we accept anything more or less than or different from the Bible?  How could fallible man be equal to or co-authorize with the perfect law of the Lord?  Let us accept no substitute or rival to the Bible!

The reader is encouraged to consider some excellent thoughts on this subject from here: https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/557-what-is-sola-scriptura