Tag: argument

Beauty

Gary Pollard

This week’s question is a new one for me: What is beauty? A follow-up question some of you may ask is, “What does that have to do with Christianity?” More than we might think! Beauty is a powerful evidence of intelligent design, an aspect of reality that inspires both fear and wonder. 

God shows us what he’s like through what he created. As Paul puts it, “There are things about God that people can’t see — his eternal power and all that makes him God. But since the beginning of the world, those things have been easy for people to understand. They are made clear in what God has made, so people have no excuse for the evil they do” (Rom 1.20). 

Inquisitive minds have marveled at the beauty/symmetry of nature for millennia. A pattern is obvious in so many seemingly-unrelated things! The “Golden Ratio” under various names has been important to our study of reality for thousands of years. It can be seen in the number of leaves on a stem, in the pattern of a nautilus shell, and even the proportions of our faces.1 Not all of us are remotely mathematically minded (at least I’m not), but I don’t need to understand the properties of Φ to appreciate its role in nature’s beauty! I have eyeballs and some level of consciousness, so it’s self-evident. 

The question wasn’t, “Why is beauty important to a believer?” Some consider this topic irrelevant or unimportant or even repulsive, but beauty plays such a powerful role in showcasing God’s unlimited power and love!

So what is beauty? In nature, it is symmetry and something that inspires awe. Snowcapped mountains and roaring seas each have their own beauty (see I Cor 15.40-41 for other examples). Awe is fear with beauty, the goosebumps we might get when we see something truly incredible or terrifying.2 God made nature and people beautiful as an expression of himself! From almost the very beginning, humanity’s enemies hijacked beauty to interact with it in ways God never intended. There’s nothing new under the sun — beauty is just one of a few things God created for good that have potential for abuse. 

In the abstract, beauty is (at least in part) whatever we might call “good” or “beneficial”. When someone helps another person we call that “beautiful”. When a person’s actions and disposition align with what is good, we call that “beautiful”. It is difficult to describe, but God has written a moral code in each person’s heart. Some listen to it, many do not. But we don’t have to delineate this code to know when something is beautiful! Anything done by that ethic is beautiful. 

So God created humans in his own image. He created them to be like himself. He created them male and female. God blessed them and said, “Have many children. Fill the earth and take control of it. … God looked at everything he had made. And he saw that everything was very good” (Gen 1.27-28, 31). 

 1 Examples of the golden ratio you can find in nature. (n.d.) Sacramento State University. https://www.csus.edu/indiv/m/mirzaagham/math1/SQ5.pdf
2 See also Mcphetres, J. & Zickfield, J. (09.2022). The physiological study of emotional piloerection: A systematic review and guide for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 179 (pp. 6-20). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.06.010

Reasoned Debates Vs. Heated Arguments

Brent Pollard

In the weeks leading up to the first presidential debate of 2024, there was much discussion about strategies to ensure that the moderators maintained control. One effective strategy to address the contentious arguments that have marred recent election cycles is to mute the microphone of the individual who is not supposed to speak at that moment. We have made significant progress since Lincoln and Douglas engaged in formal debates, meticulously presenting their prepared arguments and skillfully countering each other’s points.

Given the frequent disruptions and disorder in debates, stricter regulations and penalties for non-compliance have become imperative. By following these guidelines, candidates can focus on presenting their ideas and engaging in constructive discussions rather than being entangled in trivial disputes. This promotes more engaged and participative political discussions and reassures us of the positive outcomes that adherence to guidelines can bring.

Some argue that formal debate is disliked for its heavy reliance on logic and reasoning, while others prefer expressing emotions and reacting to words’ impact. However, it is crucial to recognize the significance of logical reasoning in debates, as it facilitates a more objective exchange of ideas. This emphasis on logical reasoning should convince us of its necessity in debates. While emotions have a place in debates, they should not overshadow well-reasoned arguments and critical thinking. Following the structure and guidelines of formal discussion can lead to more meaningful communication. Although some doubt debates can change minds, such talks will always be needed.

Let us consider six Bible debate examples: three negative and three positive.

Although not a debate in the traditional sense, the story of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4.3–8 illustrates how a lack of communication and overwhelming jealousy can lead to a devastating escalation of conflict. This story vividly portrays the detrimental consequences of unresolved conflict and heated arguments.

In Numbers 16, there is a conflict between Korah and his followers on one side and Moses and Aaron on the other regarding their leadership. This disagreement ultimately results in a harsh divine judgment. This discussion lacks productive conversation and leads to a detrimental result.

In John 8.48–59, the Pharisees engage in a heated debate with Jesus, accusing him of demon possession and blasphemy. The conversation takes a negative turn as they try to harm Jesus, resulting in personal attacks and hostility instead of constructive dialogue.

In Mark 12.28–34, a scribe asks Jesus about the most important commandment. Jesus responds by revealing the two most significant commandments: to love God deeply and show others love and kindness. The scribe agrees with Jesus and further explains his response, praising Jesus for his understanding. This conversation demonstrates a thoughtful and sincere discussion in which both individuals seek knowledge and insight.

In Acts 17:16–34, Paul has a thought-provoking discussion with the philosophers in Athens. He engages their intellect as he delves into the profound topics of God’s nature and the resurrection of Jesus. While some may ridicule him, some are captivated and eager to delve deeper. This example demonstrates Paul’s ability to engage with various worldviews respectfully and logically.

In Acts 15, the early church leaders gathered to discuss whether Gentile converts should follow Jewish law. After much deliberation, Peter, Paul, Barnabas, and James engaged in meaningful dialogue and ultimately reached a unanimous agreement. This event demonstrates how thoughtful discussion can lead to a resolution that fosters harmony.

By exploring these biblical examples of dialogue and debate, we discover enduring insights into the significance of effective communication. The examples of Cain and Abel or Korah’s rebellion stand as powerful reminders of the destructive power that can arise from uncontrolled emotions and excessive pride. On the other hand, the instances that showcase a positive outcome, such as Jesus’ conversation with the scribe or the council of early church leaders, beautifully illustrate the profound impact of engaging in respectful and open-minded dialogue. These scriptural lessons remind us of the importance of approaching dialogue with humility, a sincere desire to understand, and a dedication to truth and love. We should consider these timeless biblical principles as we journey through our conversations and differences. By engaging in thoughtful and considerate discussions, we can cultivate comprehension, address disagreements, and ultimately strengthen our connections with one another and the divine vision for human relationships.

“Come now, and let us reason together,” says the Lord (Isaiah 1.18, NASB95).

TO THOSE WHO DIVIDE BRETHREN

Neal Pollard

—“A perverse man spreads strife, and a slanderer separates intimate friends” (Prov. 16:28).
—“A worthless person, a wicked man is one who…spreads strife” (Prov. 6:12,14).
—“There are six things which the LORD hates, yes, seven which are an abomination to Him: …one who spreads strife among brothers” (Prov. 6:16,19).
—“Hatred stirs up strife, but love covers all transgressions” (Prov. 10:12).
—“Though his hatred covers itself with guile, his wickedness will be revealed before the assembly” (Prov. 26:26).
—“Keeping away from strife is an honor for a man, but any fool will quarrel” (Prov. 20:3).
—“Through insolence comes nothing but strife, but wisdom is with those who receive counsel” (Prov. 13:10).
—“The beginning of strife is like letting out water, So abandon the quarrel before it breaks out” (Prov. 17:14).
—“He who loves transgression loves strife…” (Prov. 17:19a).
—“Like charcoal to hot embers and wood to fire, So is a contentious man to kindle strife” (Prov. 26:21).
—“An arrogant man stirs up strife, But he who trusts in the Lord will prosper” (Prov. 28:25).

Suffice it to say, the Lord has not been silent on the matter. Our age is marked by the manufacturing and fanning the flames of controversy, endless argument, and divisive issues. Men seem to take pride in starting strife and stirring the pot. When we share the gospel, in gentleness (2 Tim. 2:24) and love (Eph. 4:15), it can still be met with devastating disagreement and vehement vituperation. But, thanks to mediums like social media, some among us have seized the platform to spread division where they could as easily work to promote love and unity among brethren.  I cannot presume heart or motives, but the fruit has been to start brotherhood brawls and to stratify schisms. It is worrisome that while we manufacture outrage on politics, race, law enforcement, “guilt by association,” nitpicking the church, or constantly bringing up the latest “what’s wrong with the church” scenario, 151,600 people die around the world every day (via http://www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/)! Most of that number will have traveled the broad way that leads to destruction. Surely we can redirect our passion and conviction away from divisive diversions and do our part to stem the tide of such an eternal tragedy!

Meanwhile, we can resolve to see people, not skin color, God’s sovereignty, not party affiliation or uniform, the local church’s autonomy, not an opportunity to be a busybody, and with every other, similar scenario, not major in the minors. Jesus condemned the Pharisees for neglecting the weightier provisions of the law, justice, mercy and faithfulness while scrupulously focusing on matters comparatively minor (Mat. 23:23).  We have a brief time to use our talents and influence on this earth. Will our cause be social justice, brotherhood policing, or political activism, or will it be building up the kingdom through evangelism, edification, and benevolence? May God grant us all the wisdom to “not work for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life…” (John 6:27). Be a builder, not a basher!

arguing-1296392_960_720