Category: justice

Seeking Peace Amidst Conflict: Lessons From History and Scripture

Brent Pollard

Reading comments on social media posts is bound to irritate you, like an eyelash that has gotten into your eye. People frequently share the most repulsive thoughts hidden in their hearts on the internet because of the relative anonymity it provides. I have seen the same confirmed regarding the recent Hamas-led assault against Israel. People are trying to gloss over the actions of terrorists by equating them to the alleged occupation of Jews in the region since the creation of the nation-state of Israel in 1948. 

This defense of terrorism is an equivocation. Though the creation of the Israel nation-state indeed allowed many Jews of the diaspora to return, it is naive to believe that no Jews lived in the region before May 1948. Indeed, records show that at least 600,000 Jews lived in Jerusalem before David Ben Gurion became Israel’s first Prime Minister. There were even enough Jews present in 1909 to create the city of Tel Aviv as a suburb of the Arabic city of Jaffa (Joppa). Thus, framing this argument in terms of colonialism or imperialism or accusing Israelis of perpetuating apartheid against Palestinians is a ridiculous attempt by the enemies of Western culture to validate their radical, often violent ideology.

As a Christian and an earthly citizen of the United States, it would be easy for me to sit back and watch things play out on the evening news. I can close my eyes and say that this does not concern me, even though the United States has previously been subject to jihadi attacks. But I am only fooling myself. I saw the pro-Palestinian protesters in New York City and other metropolitan areas brandishing Nazi swastikas and using the “Free Palestine: From the River to the Sea” slogan. This current protest is not about a two-state solution. Instead, these protests openly advocate for eliminating the Jewish presence in Israel. And if that sounds ominous, consider that pro-Palestinian protesters in Australia were on video chanting, “Gas the Jews.” 

But allow me to play the devil’s advocate. What if the Jews have committed atrocities against Palestinians? What then? Would the type of violence we witnessed be acceptable? The Jewish and Arab concepts of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth notwithstanding, we know what one Jew from Nazareth taught. When the rabble Judas led came to arrest Jesus, impetuous Peter pulled his sword and cut off Malchus’ ear (John 18.10). Jesus, the Jew under consideration, told Peter to put his sword away. Note Matthew’s account of these events in Matthew 26.51–53:

And behold, one of those who were with Jesus reached and drew his sword, and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear. Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword will perish by the sword. Or do you think that I cannot appeal to My Father, and He will at once put at My disposal more than twelve legions of angels? (NASB) 

Jesus sought to contrast His followers with those coming to arrest Him. Those men Judas led had swords and clubs. And Jesus asked them why they treated Him like He was the leader of some revolt (see Matthew 26.55). This mob did not need to threaten His person with physical violence. Jesus was not going to fight them. If He wanted to, Jesus could have called for 72,000 angels to protect Him (Matthew 26.53). However, 72,000 angels would have been overkill. With but one angel, God slew 185,000 Assyrians that had come to attack King Hezekiah (see 2 Kings 19.35).

Jesus acknowledged the legitimacy of the other sword, which was present, and had come to arrest Him in this moment of the “two swords,” even though His arrest was unjust (see Romans 13.4; John 18.3). In other words, Jesus recognized and submitted to the authority of the Romans. As He told Pilate, the spiritual nature of His Kingdom meant that His servants would not fight (see John 18.36). 

Though Jesus did not teach us to be doormats, He reminded us to “turn the other cheek” when the situation requires it (Matthew 5.39). If you observe the text from Matthew 26 again, Jesus did not tell Peter to disarm himself but to put his sword back in its place. Again, this was not a time for violence. Jesus was aware of the bigger picture and the larger purpose of His mission. Jesus knew that resorting to violence at that moment would detract from His more excellent message and mission. One can apply this strategy to any cause; the methods used to advance a cause can significantly impact the perception and success of the cause itself. Jesus knew that His path required that His enemies lift Him up so He could draw the world to Himself (see John 12.31–33).

Hence, even if we were to say that Israelis “earned” the violence dealt to them by Hamas, the methods used to advance the cause—beheading babies, raping women, killing the elderly—impact public perception of their alleged cause. It sours the stomach and jaundices the eye. It’s better to walk the path of nonviolent resistance than give your detractors the rationale they need to justify their violent retribution against you. And in the days ahead, we will no doubt see much more violence in Gaza. 

As we continue to follow the unfolding events between Israel and Hamas, we must learn the lessons that history and the Bible have to teach us about violence and the repercussions of our actions and beliefs. The advice to avoid escalation and seek understanding is universally applicable, regardless of whether we are policymakers, commentators, or observers. Wisdom and compassion pave the way to long-lasting solutions, while violence breeds more violence irrespective of the justification or historical context. We can only hope that the leaders of all parties learn from history and pursue paths that lead to peace, reconciliation, and coexistence. 

Oise-Aigne American Cemetery Plot E

Neal Pollard

My brother and fellow preacher, Brent Pollard, finds the most interesting historical facts—an ability which makes his preaching illustrations most interesting.  He sent me an article about the Oise-Aigne Cemetery in northern France.  Though I have actually visited that cemetery, I had no idea about the existence of an auxiliary burial plot known as “Plot E.”  While the 6012 military personnel buried in the four main burial plots lost their lives in World War I, the 94 interred in Plot E are infamous, disgraced soldiers who died for their crimes during or after World War II.  These men either murdered fellow soldiers or raped and/or murdered 71 people in England, France, Belgium, Germany, Italy and Algeria.  “No US flag is permitted to fly over the section, and the numbered graves literally lie with their backs turned to the main cemetery on the other side of the road” (warhistoryonline.com).

These men were supposed to be fighting for the freedoms and rights of American citizens, but instead they were most dramatically undermining the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness of the unfortunate ones who crossed their paths.  For their crimes, they not only paid the ultimate penalty but were buried in disgrace and immortalized with infamy. They are remembered as “the dishonorable dead.”

The book of Revelation refers to the “book of life” (20:12), implying that it is possible for one’s name to be blotted out of it (3:5).  However, those whose names are not found in that book will be “cast into the lake of fire” (20:15). Those who take away from the words of this revelation—and by application any other (cf. Gal. 1:6-9)—“God shall take away his part of out of the book of life” (22:19).  More specifically, John says, “And nothing unclean, and no one who practices abomination and lying, shall ever come into it, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life” (21:27).  For the ungodly and disobedient, John lays out in apocalyptic terms how unthinkably horrible it will be to die unfaithful to Christ.  He says, “He also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night…” (14:10-11a).

Everyone will stand before the judgment seat of Christ (2 Cor. 5:10).  The faithful will receive glory and honor and reward (Mat. 25:34-40).  The unrighteous, however, will go away into everlasting punishment (Mat. 25:46).  No one will deserve heaven, but will go there thanks to God’s amazing grace and his or her conscious effort to walk in the light (1 John 1:7-10). Those who know not and obey not the gospel will endure something eternally worse than a firing squad, a hangman’s noose, or blameworthy burial (2 Th. 1:8-9).  Though the world may believe less and less in the reality of hell, the Bible’s position on the matter has not changed. Knowing the terror of the Lord, may we persuade others and, ourselves, be persuaded (2 Cor. 5:11).