Tag: census

SATAN ENTICED DAVID TO… COUNT?

The first time we read the name “Satan” in the Bible, it’s under very strange circumstances. Ready?

Here’s the passage: 

“Satan rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel.”

Dale Pollard

The first time we read the name “Satan” in the Bible, it’s under very strange circumstances. Ready?

Here’s the passage: 

“Satan rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel.” 

(I Chronicles 21:1, NIV)

Alright, so Satan decides to pick a fight with God’s man. So  how does he do it this time? Well, he incites (or entices) David to take a census of Israel— of course. You might be thoroughly confused at this point but just wait, you’ll want to throw something breakable in a second. 

So Satan takes his shot at David and apparently the most devious plan he could come up with was, “Operation Headcount.” There must be more to it than that. Surely. 

Make it Make Census

A census in the ancient world—especially in Israel—was not just a headcount. It carried spiritual, political, and economic weight. 

It typically involved counting all the men and for at least a few practical reasons. A ruler could use the census to determine the size of his army, or make sure proper tax revenue was collected, or get an idea of how capable his labor force was. Oh, and for Israel, it better be done right. 

Exodus 30:12 warns that a census must be accompanied by a ransom/offering, or else a plague would come upon the people:

“Then each one must give a ransom for his life to the LORD… so that no plague may come on them when you number them.”

So maybe now’s a good time to address an alleged contradiction. 

Our original passage in question (I Chron. 21:1) is already interpreted in a few ways, especially when compared to its parallel account in 2 Samuel 24:1, which says:

“Again the anger of the LORD burned against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, ‘Go and take a census of Israel and Judah.’”

Did you catch that too? Seems like Samuel contradicts the Chronicler by saying that God was really the one who enticed David into counting folks, not Satan. So which is it— and did you throw something yet? 

It Was Satan….. Probably 

No matter how you slice it, Satan is the one doing the enticing and here’s how we can be sure. 

First, let’s start by contrasting the similarities between this case and Job’s situation. God allowed Satan to test Job— but He remained sovereign. God was clearly in control while Satan had to ask His permission before making Jobs life so miserable. God let the devil torment his most faithful servant, but with strict conditions (Job 1.8,12). 

Secondly, it’s possible that “Satan” in 1 Chronicles 21:1 should really be translated “adversary.” Now, this next part isn’t typed with any real certainty, it’s only a personal observation (by the author). 

Remember the account of Balaam and his donkey? It’s worth reading again, even if you’re familiar with it. Just before the conversation between a man and his animal takes place we read: 

“God’s anger was kindled because he [Balaam] went, and the angel of the LORD took his stand in the way as his adversary” (Numbers 22:22). 

The word adversary is the exact same word that’s translated as Satan in 1 Chronicles 21:1. However, it was the angel of the Lord that stood as an adversary. The language is strikingly similar in both passages. Take a peek, but this time side by side…by side: 

1 Chronicles 21:1 

“Then Satan stood against Israel and incited David to number Israel.” 

Numbers 22:22

“God’s anger was kindled because Balaam went, and the angel of the LORD took his stand in the way as his adversary”

2 Samuel 24:1

“…the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he incited David against them, saying, “Go, number Israel and Judah.”

How satisfying is that? Instead of a contradiction you see consistency; inspired perfection on full display. 

So What Happened To David? 

Well, he messed up. A lesser known misstep on David’s part, too. God sent a plague as a consequence—exactly as Exodus 30 had warned. As tragic as that was, again the consistency is amazing. There was a thousand years or so between Exodus and Chronicles but God still remembered exactly what He had told Moses.

After the census, David felt guilt immediately (2 Sam. 24:10) and repented. As anybody after God’s heart would do. 

Navigating the Complexities of Worship

Biblical Examples of Obedience and Error

Brent Pollard

 Comparing the post-exilic Jews criticized in Malachi, David, and Nadab and Abihu provides a holistic picture of the connection between human deeds and divine expectations in worship and obedience. Each scenario represents distinct facets of human engagement with divine decrees and religious rituals.

The Jews who returned from exile did not exert much effort in following God’s decrees during Malachi’s time. God accused them of robbing Him because they withheld their offerings (Malachi 3.8–12). Even when they did bring offerings, they only brought God their leftovers, which God considered disrespectful since it showed a lack of reverence and sincerity toward Him (Malachi 1.6–14). Consequently, their lack of reverence and sincerity undermined their worship and strained their relationship with Him.

It is essential to refrain from viewing worship as a mere duty and instead approach it sincerely, reflecting deeply on God’s holiness and His expectations.

David’s unauthorized census, influenced by Satan during a time of divine displeasure with Israel, exemplifies a grave judgment error by disregarding Exodus’s instructions for conducting censuses (Exodus 30.11–12). Despite his general Joab’s objections, David proceeded, only to recognize his sin swiftly. God presented three punitive options, with David choosing a three-day pestilence. At Araunah’s threshing floor, divine mercy stopped this pestilence. God instructed David to make a sacrifice there to atone for his sin. Araunah offered his livestock, crops, and farming implements as fuel for the sacrifice. However, David insisted on purchasing the necessary items for the sacrifice from Araunah, emphasizing that true sacrifice must come with a personal cost, reflecting his repentance and adherence to divine instructions (2 Samuel 24.24; 1 Chronicles 21.24).

David’s insistence on offering to God only what costs him personally emphasizes the value of sacrifice and personal investment in worship. Similarly, our worship and offerings to God must be meaningful and require personal sacrifice. David’s actions demonstrate the value of sincerity, individual responsibility, and acknowledging God’s worthiness in worship. We should not assume God expects less of us.

In Leviticus 10.1, we read about Nadab and Abihu, who offered a “strange” fire that God had not authorized. Their lack of sober judgment might have made things worse. The story serves as a warning about the significance of following God’s commands regarding worship. The severe punishment given to Nadab and Abihu shows how seriously God takes obedience and the dangers of presumptuous or innovative worship practices.

What comparative insights can we glean from examining these three examples of worship?

David sincerely adheres to divine commands, while Nadab and Abihu and the post-exilic Jews act presumptuously or complacently.

David demonstrates a profound reverence for God and deeply understands His nature. He acknowledges the importance of making meaningful sacrifices. Nadab and Abihu, on the other hand, failed to show reverence or a complete understanding of the sacred nature of God’s specific instructions. The actions of the post-exilic Jews imply a detachment from the importance and meaning of their worship practices.

The narrative of David underscores the crucial value of genuine and heartfelt worship. Nadab and Abihu’s story warns those who disregard God’s commands. Additionally, the account in Malachi calls for reevaluating our approach to worship. It urges us to move away from complacency and towards a more heartfelt and obedient practice. These stories emphasize the consequences of our actions and highlight the valuable lessons we can learn from them.

The central theme derived from these examples underscores the importance of approaching God with sincerity, reverence, and unwavering obedience. Worship transcends mere human actions for personal satisfaction; it is a divine mandate that demands meticulous adherence to God’s commands and a heart devoted to honoring Him. Each of these narratives offers valuable perspectives on the nature of worship, the significance of obedience, and the consequences of diverse attitudes and actions in response to divine directives.