Malachi: The Divine Dispute (II)

COVENANTS CORRUPTED (2:1-17)

Neal Pollard

Egon Pfeiffer, a German scholar from the last century, is credited with introducing the idea that the book of Malachi divides into six “disputation” speeches (formal arguments or debates), “rhetorical exchanges formed by a statement or affirmation, a denial or counter statement, and arguments to support the original statement” (Evangelische Theologie 19 (1959): 546–68). Others have followed his outline: (1) 1:2-5; (2) 1:6-2:9; (3) 2:10-16); (4) 2:17-3:5; (5) 3:6-12; (6) 3:13-4:3. 

We have already seen what the first two arguments involve. The first dealt with Judah questioning God’s love, and the second had to do with the priests’ unfaithfulness to do their work. The argument surrounding the priests is the longest of the book, extending halfway through chapter two. That is followed by an argument about divorce (2:10-16). Near the end of chapter two, an argument is made about God’s justice. 

But there is a central theme in this second chapter, when viewed as a whole (as it is divided in our Bibles). Notice the word “covenant,” found six times and cutting across the two major disputations of the chapter.  This word, covenant,is “a technical term referring to the imposition of an obligation upon another” (Hughes, Lexham Theo Wdbk, np). The bottom line was that Judah contemptuously viewed God’s covenants that He laid down for them.

The priestly covenant (1-9). God calls out the disobedience of the priests and what spiritual cost they had to pay if they continued their rebellion (1-4). He reminds them of the blessings and prosperity that followed their obedience to His covenant in the past (5-7). Then, He reminds them that it is the role of the priest to teach, live, and preserve what is right (7). But they had failed in this basic, crucial role (8). Consequently, God was going to let them fail and fall (9). 

The national covenant (10-12). As goes the leadership, so goes the followers. Malachi widens his focus to the entire nation. No longer addressing the priests, the prophet asks, “Do we not all have one father?” (10). The first person plural (we, us) is under consideration as he speaks of how everyone dealt treacherously with his brother (10). Not surprisingly, they dealt the same way with God (11-12), profaning His sanctuary and turning to idols. They had no regard for their promises and commitments to God. 

The marriage covenant (13-17). The people of Judah had turned their backs on integrity. Their word was meaningless, from their worship to their treatment of their neighbors and brethren. Not surprisingly, this dishonesty crept into their homes and marriages. Men dealt treacherously with their companions, the wives of their youth by covenant (14). They discarded them like they were worthless, and God said He hates that (16). Doesn’t it get your attention to hear God talk about something He hates?!

Though God is changing the subject with another disputation in verse 17, we get a glimpse into His mindset as He speaks of being wearied by the people’s words. They were worthless. Another key word in chapter two is the word “treacherously,” found five times throughout. It means to deal deceitfully and unfaithfully. Integrity was forgotten. Honor and keeping their word was discarded. God had kept His end of the agreement, and He commands His people to restore their honor and keep the worship, community, and marriage covenants they had made. As Malachi 3:6 reminds us, God does not change. How does He feel today about us cheapening our commitments? All we need to do is reread Malachi 2!