Category: hermeneutics

That’s Your Interpretation

Neal Pollard

There are multiple Greek words used in the New Testament to talk about the process of explaining and interpreting God’s Word.

  • Mark 4:34 tells us Jesus was “explaining” His parables and other teachings to the disciples. This word means to loose or set free, to clarify and interpret.
  • Luke 24:27 is the first of six occurrences of a word translated “explained,” “translated,” and “interpreted” to speak of Jesus explaining to the disciples on the road to Emmaus how the Old Testament Scripture concerned Himself. The word refers to formal, extensive explanation of what is difficult to understand.
  • A trio of passages in Acts (11:4; 18:26; 28:23) refer to a word meaning to “expose” (a fourth use in Acts is used by Stephen to speak of Moses’ parents setting him outside, 7:21) or explain, manifest, declare, and expound. The latter three are all used in reference to a man taking God’s Word and explaining it to others.
  • 2 Peter 1:20 is the passage telling us that “no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation….” This word (“interpretation”) means to release or unravel, the act or process of explaining even what is difficult or complex.

We live in a world where even the religious decry any attempt to give an absolute meaning or interpretation of a verse or paragraph of the Bible. While great care and careful study should accompany any effort to understand what Scripture is saying, the passages above (and a great many others) prove that God intended for His Word to be interpreted. Yet, it is suggested that there was a right way for them to be understood. Definitive, binding conclusions could be drawn. All people could (and must) conform to the commands, teachings, and principles of those passages.

Truly, everyone who thoughtfully studies it interprets the Bible. Our challenge is to faithfully, honestly, and truly understand each passage in its context and ultimately harmonize it with the whole of Scripture. The Bible repeatedly speaks of Jesus and others taking the Old Testament, making interpretations and sharing them as authoritative truths to be obeyed.

Paul uses another word, unique to him, to tell Timothy to “handle accurately the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15). Other Scriptures speak of this “word of truth” as being intrinsically tied to bringing about our salvation (Eph. 1:13; Jas. 1:18). The word translated “handle accurately” means “to cut in a straight line; ἵνα ὀρθοτομῇ τὰς ὁδούς σου so that he gives you the right direction, so that he teaches you correctly, so that he gives you the right teaching” (Lust, Eynikel, and Hauspie, LEX LXX Lex., np). Leave it to a tentmaker to use such an analogy.

The New Testament is filled with passages teaching us about salvation, church organization, worship, gender roles, sexuality, morality, and much, much more. If these and other Scriptures can be cut straight, can’t they be cut crooked (cf. 2 Pet. 3:16)? If parables had a right interpretation, couldn’t they have wrong ones? If the Old Testament can be used to explain truth about Jesus, couldn’t they also be used to teach error about Him? The work of Peter, Aquila and Priscilla, and Paul in Acts, explaining to others, is implicitly endorsed as sound and proper. Doesn’t that mean that one could fail in such efforts by improper handling of Scripture? If holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit, the intention was for their words to be taken, processed, and utilized in a way that produced God’s pleasure and approval.

In a relativistic age, where knowledge, truth, and morality is said to not be absolute, authoritative, and binding, such passages are ignored or denied. Yet, there they stand, resolutely declaring that Scripture must be properly interpreted. The task for you and me is to humbly, prayerfully, and diligently read, meditate upon, study, then obey from the heart all that God commands in His Word. Is it important? Jesus thought so, asserting, “He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word I spoke is what will judge him at the last day” (John 12:48; cf. John 14:26; 16:13). May “our interpretation” harmonize with the meaning He clearly intends and instructs through His inspired writers! Nothing else will suffice!

Nuremberg Celestial Event

Dale Pollard

Hans Glaser records an event that took place around dawn on April 14th, 1561 AD. He states that, “many men and women saw an aerial battle out of the sun.” This strange celestial phenomena was followed by the appearance of a large black triangular object which resembled the tip of a spear. There were spheres that fell to earth and cylindrical objects that moved erratically in the sky above. The woodcut illustration that these events were engraved on show objects of various shapes and sizes, including crosses and two large crescents. 

What had Hans  and all the others seen that day? It’s still up for debate. Was it a meteor shower? Was it a Sun Dog? It’s not clear. However, it provides us with an interesting mystery that also serves as a spiritual reminder. 

Hans Glaser certainly felt that this was a sign from God and that the community of old Nuremberg needed to turn from their sinful ways— but was it? 

Scripture records some celestial phenomena that we can confidentially say were supernatural in their planning (Josh. 10.11-14, Lk. 23.44) but outside of that we must be careful not to attribute what we don’t understand to an purposeful act of heaven. After all, it could be a rare but natural occurrence. It could be a misidentification or misinterpretation and we shouldn’t forget how human we all are. If God directly tells us through His word, we can trust it. If it’s not inspired, but claims things with great spiritual consequences— careful. 

It’s far too easy for us to wrongly interpret even the scriptures we have to try and make sense of the world around us. While there are relevant passages that shed light on the modern age, the faithful should take to heart the command to Timothy (2 Tim. 2.15) and handle God’s book with great respect humility. There’s so much we don’t know, but we can be confident in that we serve a God who knows all. 

The Profound Context of Matthew 16:24

Brent Pollard

The Pitfalls of Proof-texting

Are you occasionally guilty of proof-texting? Proof-texting is the practice of using specific passages from the Bible to justify a larger body of doctrine or belief. For example, teaching that a simple prayer is all required to obtain salvation is incorrect when someone uses a verse like Romans 10:13. However, we may occasionally engage in sloppy proof-texting. It might become a standard practice to pull a verse out of context and use it to teach a specific lesson, especially when delivering a sermon on a timely topic.

Sometimes, I’m like the Ethiopian official of Acts 8, unable to understand independently and needing a Phillip to guide me in applying Scripture. On other occasions, I’ve not been as diligent in my Bible reading and study. As an illustration, consider Matthew 16.24:

“Then Jesus said to His disciples, ‘If anyone wants to come after Me, he must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow Me…’” (NASB)

Unpacking Matthew 16.24

So, what is the deeper meaning behind this verse? At a cursory glance, it advocates living a selfless, Christ-centered life. Can that be the correct point of view but an incomplete answer? Have you ever pondered on Jesus’ motivation for this statement? Considering the verses around it highlights the importance of this particular verse even more.

Foretelling His Death

Before Matthew 16.24, Jesus reveals His impending suffering, death, and resurrection in Jerusalem to His disciples. Matthew elaborates on this detail in verse 21. Following Peter’s rebuke, Jesus retorts, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me; for you are not setting your mind on God’s purposes, but men’s.” (Matthew 16.23 NASB) This rebuke paves the way for His subsequent proclamation.

Cost of Discipleship

When Jesus asked His disciples to “take up their crosses,” He wasn’t merely alluding to inconveniencing themselves. In the Roman context, the cross symbolized a horrific death. Jesus propounds a radical form of discipleship, which might entail severe hardships, even to the extent of death.

Identity of Jesus

The backdrop of Matthew 16.13–20, where Peter acknowledges Jesus as “the Christ, the Son of the living God,” intensifies the narrative. Their recognition of His identity as the Messiah profoundly impacts His call to discipleship and the prophecy of His demise.

Theme of the Kingdom

Throughout Matthew’s Gospel, the theme of the Kingdom is prevalent. Jesus paints a picture of a Kingdom that defies worldly conventions—where the last shall be first, the meek inherit the earth, and true leaders serve. The call to bear one’s cross redefines power, leadership, and sacrifice within this framework.

Post Matthew 16:24’s Context

After 16.24, in verses 25–28, Jesus revisits the essence of radical discipleship. He challenges established ideas about life, pointing towards a deeper spiritual understanding.

Broader Interpretation

Many correctly perceive Jesus’ words in Matthew 16.24 as a directive to lead a Christ-focused life. But its genuine gravitas emerges when contextualized. After foretelling His sufferings and ultimate sacrifice, Jesus presents discipleship not as mere renunciation but potentially a path encompassing suffering, even death. Peter’s affirmation and the recurring Kingdom theme in Matthew magnify this verse’s impact. To fully grasp its true meaning, one must look at the larger narrative and how it fits the Gospel’s overarching theme: the Kingdom’s reversal of societal norms and values. This comprehensive viewpoint adds depth and richness to the essence of Christian faith, emphasizing the importance of perseverance.

Supersize Your Scripture Smarts!

Tuesday’s Column: Dale Mail

Dale Pollard

The Bible is not a mysterious book of codes that can’t be cracked, though some might try and lead you to believe that. 

We know that the water can be metaphorically muddied rather quickly when there are countless faulty interpretations of books like Revelation, Daniel, Ezekiel, Isaiah, and other prophetic or apocalyptic literature. Typology is another misunderstood, and often misapplied, method of Bible study. I’m convinced that if we can spend some time studying the different “types” found in scripture, we can see God’s message for mankind more clearly and have a more profound grasp of His Word. This also happens to be a great way to grow our knowledge of scripture more quickly!

So first, let’s try to clarify exactly what Typology is. 

Summed up in one sentence it’s referring to Old Testament things which are prefigured or symbolized by events and characters of the New Testament.

This may sound a little confusing, but let’s look at a few examples. 

  1. John 3:14 says that just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of man must be lifted up (Num. 21:9). The Christ “type” is the bronze serpent. We know because of a specific New Testament reference. 
  2. 1 Peter 3:20: “…God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built, only a few people, 8 in all were saved through water,” This illustrates how in the same way baptismal water saves those who submit to Christ today. 

Typology is not some mystic Bible code where we are free to translate events and characters in scripture as we please because God tells us exactly what He intended to say. 

1 Cor. 14:33 says that God is NOT the “author of confusion.” He has a message for us all— and it’s a message of hope. 

Are you interested in learning more about typology? The perfect book for you to study would be the book of Hebrews as it makes more Old Testament references than any other New Testament book. By diving into Hebrews you will appreciate and understand both the Old Testament, and the Bible as a whole.