Gary Pollard
Since some people give weight to the claim made by the leaders of the heresy we are discussing (i.e. they established a division between justice and goodness, and have even applied this division to divine things) we have to respond to them as briefly as possible.
They argue that the Father of our master Jesus Christ is a good God but not a just one, while the God of the law and the prophets is just but not good. According to them, goodness consists in granting benefits to everyone indiscriminately, even those who are unworthy and undeserving of kindness. But in my judgment, they misapply this definition because they assume that suffering and hardship aren’t beneficial at all.
Justice, on the other hand, they define as the quality that assigns to each person what he deserves. Yet here too they misunderstand their own definition. They assume that justice means sending evils upon the wicked and benefits upon the righteous. The just God appears to not care about the good of the wicked at all, but to act toward them with something like hostility.
To support this view they collect examples from the Old Testament where divine judgment is described: the punishment of the flood and the destruction of those who perished in it; the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah by fire and brimstone; and the deaths of the people in the wilderness because of their sins, so that none who came out of Egypt entered the promised land except Joshua and Caleb. By contrast, from the New Testament they assemble sayings marked by mercy and compassion, which Jesus used to train his disciples. They appeal especially to the statement that “no one is good except God alone,” and on this basis they dare to call the Father of Jesus Christ the good God, while asserting that the God who made the world is another deity altogether—whom they describe as just, but not good.
The Preacher Pollard Blog 