Category: debate

Reasoned Debates Vs. Heated Arguments

Brent Pollard

In the weeks leading up to the first presidential debate of 2024, there was much discussion about strategies to ensure that the moderators maintained control. One effective strategy to address the contentious arguments that have marred recent election cycles is to mute the microphone of the individual who is not supposed to speak at that moment. We have made significant progress since Lincoln and Douglas engaged in formal debates, meticulously presenting their prepared arguments and skillfully countering each other’s points.

Given the frequent disruptions and disorder in debates, stricter regulations and penalties for non-compliance have become imperative. By following these guidelines, candidates can focus on presenting their ideas and engaging in constructive discussions rather than being entangled in trivial disputes. This promotes more engaged and participative political discussions and reassures us of the positive outcomes that adherence to guidelines can bring.

Some argue that formal debate is disliked for its heavy reliance on logic and reasoning, while others prefer expressing emotions and reacting to words’ impact. However, it is crucial to recognize the significance of logical reasoning in debates, as it facilitates a more objective exchange of ideas. This emphasis on logical reasoning should convince us of its necessity in debates. While emotions have a place in debates, they should not overshadow well-reasoned arguments and critical thinking. Following the structure and guidelines of formal discussion can lead to more meaningful communication. Although some doubt debates can change minds, such talks will always be needed.

Let us consider six Bible debate examples: three negative and three positive.

Although not a debate in the traditional sense, the story of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4.3–8 illustrates how a lack of communication and overwhelming jealousy can lead to a devastating escalation of conflict. This story vividly portrays the detrimental consequences of unresolved conflict and heated arguments.

In Numbers 16, there is a conflict between Korah and his followers on one side and Moses and Aaron on the other regarding their leadership. This disagreement ultimately results in a harsh divine judgment. This discussion lacks productive conversation and leads to a detrimental result.

In John 8.48–59, the Pharisees engage in a heated debate with Jesus, accusing him of demon possession and blasphemy. The conversation takes a negative turn as they try to harm Jesus, resulting in personal attacks and hostility instead of constructive dialogue.

In Mark 12.28–34, a scribe asks Jesus about the most important commandment. Jesus responds by revealing the two most significant commandments: to love God deeply and show others love and kindness. The scribe agrees with Jesus and further explains his response, praising Jesus for his understanding. This conversation demonstrates a thoughtful and sincere discussion in which both individuals seek knowledge and insight.

In Acts 17:16–34, Paul has a thought-provoking discussion with the philosophers in Athens. He engages their intellect as he delves into the profound topics of God’s nature and the resurrection of Jesus. While some may ridicule him, some are captivated and eager to delve deeper. This example demonstrates Paul’s ability to engage with various worldviews respectfully and logically.

In Acts 15, the early church leaders gathered to discuss whether Gentile converts should follow Jewish law. After much deliberation, Peter, Paul, Barnabas, and James engaged in meaningful dialogue and ultimately reached a unanimous agreement. This event demonstrates how thoughtful discussion can lead to a resolution that fosters harmony.

By exploring these biblical examples of dialogue and debate, we discover enduring insights into the significance of effective communication. The examples of Cain and Abel or Korah’s rebellion stand as powerful reminders of the destructive power that can arise from uncontrolled emotions and excessive pride. On the other hand, the instances that showcase a positive outcome, such as Jesus’ conversation with the scribe or the council of early church leaders, beautifully illustrate the profound impact of engaging in respectful and open-minded dialogue. These scriptural lessons remind us of the importance of approaching dialogue with humility, a sincere desire to understand, and a dedication to truth and love. We should consider these timeless biblical principles as we journey through our conversations and differences. By engaging in thoughtful and considerate discussions, we can cultivate comprehension, address disagreements, and ultimately strengthen our connections with one another and the divine vision for human relationships.

“Come now, and let us reason together,” says the Lord (Isaiah 1.18, NASB95).

More Light Than Heat

Neal Pollard

In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Polonius counsels his daughter, Ophelia, about Hamlet’s vows of love, saying, “When the blood burns, how prodigal the soul lends the tongue vows. These blazes, daughter, giving more light than heat, extinct in both even in their promise as it is a-making, you must not take for fire” (Act 1, Scene 3). Her point is that passionate desire causes a man to profusely promise anything in order to get what he wants, but it may lack substance and trustworthiness. It appears more promising than it really is. We’ve likely all witnessed and experienced this. What good is a fire if it doesn’t produce heat?

When it comes to discussing religious matters, things can get pretty heated. Unfortunately, as the temperature rises, solid conclusions are elusive because there is much more emotion than illumination. Inasmuch as God’s Word is to be a light and lamp (Ps. 119:105), these are times where all are benefited by more light than heat. Too often, instead of proving or disproving something, we resort to personal attacks on the other person, assert a position appealing to a variety of alleged proofs or rationales without benefit of a singular Scripture, or we’ll abuse, distort, and contort a passage to say what it does not mean. As battle lines are drawn and trenches are dug, the two sides become wider and more intensely apart while the matter under discussion fades into the background. 

Because the New Testament repeatedly commands unity (Eph. 4:1ff; 1 Cor. 1:10-13), we must “pursue the things which make for peace and the building up of one another” (Rom. 14:19). Are there tangible actions we can take to pursue more light than heat in these matters that distress our unity?

  • Genuinely listen. That doesn’t mean merely hear what the other is saying, but listen open-mindedly, seeking to understand what the other person is saying. Don’t presuppose or listen with prejudice. Truly, “He who gives an answer before he hears, It is folly and shame to him” (Prov. 18:13). 
  • Genuinely love. Love for God should be preeminent, but such love is not in opposition to brotherly love. In fact, they are intrinsically bound together (1 Jn. 4:20-21). While love does not mean compromising truth, it will prompt us to do what love requires (cf. 1 Cor. 13:4-8)—be patient, be kind, act becomingly, don’t be provoked, etc. 
  • Genuinely learn. Do we really know their view or merely think we do? This requires great self-examination and disciplined introspection. If we champion a position and have argued the matter before, we may think our fellow disputant believes what he or she does not actually believe. Preconceptions eclipse thoughtful interaction. We should ever be students, making sure we’ve not missed it. 
  • Genuinely long. Peace and unity will sometimes be impossible, but we shouldn’t let that be because we didn’t sincerely seek it. By lovingly seeing the other person as an eternal soul for whom Christ died (as well as any and all who would be influenced by the other person), surely we will strive to gently, civilly, and earnestly discuss the matter (cf. 2 Tim. 2:24-26). 

We live in divisive times. They are carnal times, full of “bitterness and wrath and clamor and slander…with all malice” (Eph. 4:31). We must remember that the “anger of man does not achieve the righteousness of God” (Jas. 1:20). What does? God’s Word (Jas. 1:18-25)! Too often, we’ll be locked in matters of truth and error and must uphold truth. But let’s be so careful to discern when that’s the case and always speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15). Such will produce light rather than heat!

Burn Light Wood Heat Fire Red Burning Flame