An Excruciating Assignment (1:1-11)
Neal Pollard
Perhaps no book in the Bible begins more startlingly than Hosea. Truly, this headliner of the section known as the Minor Prophets is difficult both in its message and its method. Linguists who approach this book rank it with Job as the most difficult to translate due to writing style and the number of unique and rare words making up Hosea. Yet, it is a fascinating book that draws heavily on people, places, and events from the Pentateuch (Gen.-Deut.). Those books are cited as evidence against the sins of the people in Hosea’s day. The prophet takes a jolting turn from the historical situation, his marriage to a prostitute and fathering three children with her, to the spiritual application for Israel. Yet, as Duane Garrett says, “It is as startling in its presentation of sin as it is surprising in its stubborn certainty of grace. It is as blunt as it is enigmatic. It is a book to be experienced, and the experience is with God” (NAC, 21).
Dating the book is fairly straightforward from the very first verse, during the days of four kings in the southern kingdom and one king, Jeroboam II, in the northern kingdom. There is a strong clue in this that what Hosea wrote to warn Israel (northern kingdom) about happened. Unfaithful Israel faced a dire future if she did not repent. Since Hezekiah, the last king of Judah mentioned, saw the fall of Samaria (Isa. 36-39), we can date the book of Hosea to cover the last half of the 8th Century B.C. (760-710 B.C.). We do not know why Hosea is unconcerned with the reigns of the six kings of Israel who succeeded Jeroboam II, but the mention of the southern kings imply that he ignores them.
Hosea’s task is extremely difficult. God tells the prophet, “Go, take to yourself a wife of harlotry and have children of harlotry; for the land commits flagrant harlotry, forsaking the Lord” (2). This heartsick-making imperative symbolizes the covenant situation with Israel from God’s perspective. God was a faithful husband, loving and caring for the nation. Israel jilted God to pursue heathen nations, heathen gods, and horrific, sinful practices. As the result of her whoring, she gave birth to no hope and no identity! This is symbolized by the naming of the three children born to Hosea, the prophet, and Gomer, the harlot.
The first child, a son, is named Jezreel. The name means “God sows.” It was not a common name for a person, but he seems to be named for the town and valley of Jezreel north of Samaria in the region of Galilee. The significance of that area is implied with Hosea’s talk of the “bloodshed” of Jezreel. It was the home of Naboth, who Jezebel had brutally murdered so Ahab could gain his vineyard (1 Ki. 21:1ff). Consequently, it was the place where Jezebel would die violently with bloodshed (1 Ki. 21:23). King Joram was violently killed by Jehu there (2 Ki. 9:15ff). Jehu killed all the remnant of Ahab’s house there (2 Ki. 10:12). On and on the bloody history of Jezreel was written. God used Jehu to judge Ahab’s house for sin, but now Jehu’s house would be judged for their own idolatry and wickedness (4-5). With the end of that dynasty, Israel would limp and totter until ultimately God crushes them with the Assyrians.
The name of the second child, Lo-ruhamah, meant “no compassion” and “no forgiveness” (6). This symbolism was very straightforward. There would be no compassion or forgiveness for stubborn and impenitent Israel (6), but there would be for Judah (7a). Yet, the deliverance for Judah would be by God’s power rather than man’s strength (7b).
Thirdly, Gomer conceives and bears a third child, a son, whom Hosea is to name Lo-ammi. The name means “not my people.” God explains that, more fully, the name represents the idea that Israel is not His people and He is not their God (9). What a startling turnaround for a people who claimed Abraham as their father and basked in centuries of favored status as his descendants. Hosea alludes to this promise with an equally surprising follow-up statement in verses 10-11. As severe and costly as their coming punishment would be, God’s relentless love would cause Him to revive and survive led by one leader (11). Opinions differ, but it seems to me that the most logical fulfillment of this promise is Christ. It does not seem to refer to a return from physical captivity. It would also fit with the idea of the Messiah being a root and a tender plant, as Hosea ends the chapter referring again to Jezreel (God sows). God would plant the solution that would fulfill His undying love for His people, giving them hope and restoration.
It truly is a startling, amazing book, a love story of a husband who would not give up on a perpetually unfaithful wife. It is a love we must relentlessly embrace, not recklessly reject!
